经阴道子宫输卵管四维超声造影在不孕症诊断中的应用价值
|
摘要
目的观察经阴道子宫输卵管四维超声造影(TVS 4D-HyCoSy)在不孕症诊断中的应用价值。方法选择2017年7月至2018年2月于我院进行不孕症诊断的45例患者进行临床研究,所有患者均给予子宫输卵管X线碘油造影(HSG)和TVS4D-HyCoSy检查。比较两种方法的诊断结果及不良反应发生情况。结果输卵管X线碘油造影与四维超声造影的诊断结果无统计学差异(P>0.05)。四维超声造影的不良反应发生率为4.44%,显著低于输卵管X线碘油造影的17.78%(P <0.05)。结论经阴道子宫输卵管四维超声造影在不孕症的诊断中具有重要的临床价值,诊断准确性高,不良反应少,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To observe the value of transvaginal four-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography(TVS 4 D-HyCoSy in the diagnosis of infertility. Methods 45 patients with infertility diagnosis in our hospital from July 2017 to February 2018 were selected for clinical study. All patients were given hysterosalpingography(HSG) and TVS 4 D-HyCoSy examination. The diagnosis results and incidence of adverse reactions of two methods were compared. Results The diagnosis results of HSG and TVS 4 D-HyCoSy showed no significant difference(P >0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions of TVS 4 D-HyCoSy was 4.44%, significantly lower than 17.78% of HSG(P <0.05). Conclusions TVS 4 D-Hy CoSy has important clinical value in the diagnosis of infertility, with high diagnostic accuracy and few adverse reactions, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
Objective To observe the value of transvaginal four-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography(TVS 4 D-HyCoSy in the diagnosis of infertility. Methods 45 patients with infertility diagnosis in our hospital from July 2017 to February 2018 were selected for clinical study. All patients were given hysterosalpingography(HSG) and TVS 4 D-HyCoSy examination. The diagnosis results and incidence of adverse reactions of two methods were compared. Results The diagnosis results of HSG and TVS 4 D-HyCoSy showed no significant difference(P >0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions of TVS 4 D-HyCoSy was 4.44%, significantly lower than 17.78% of HSG(P <0.05). Conclusions TVS 4 D-Hy CoSy has important clinical value in the diagnosis of infertility, with high diagnostic accuracy and few adverse reactions, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
引文
[1]周青,熊雯,陈琴,等. TVS 4D-HyCoSy评估不孕症患者输卵管通畅度的临床应用分析[J].实用医院临床杂志, 2017, 14(6):55-57.
[2]李梁瑜,林艳,杨柳,等.经阴道四维子宫输卵管超声造影对输卵管通畅性评估价值分析[J].中医临床研究, 2018, 10(21):144-146.
[3]张蕊.经阴道三维、四维子宫输卵管超声造影诊断输卵管通畅性的价值[J].保健文汇, 2018,(8):252.
[4]陈粉红,陈伟,魏芳,等.联合应用经阴道四维和二维超声造影术诊断输卵管性不孕的价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志, 2015, 24(10):869-873.
[5]刘佳,俞磊.经阴道子宫输卵管四维超声造影评价输卵管通畅性的价值[J].海南医学, 2017, 28(24):4043-4046.
[6]李媛媛.经阴道子宫输卵管四维超声造影评价输卵管通畅性中的价值分析[J].临床研究, 2015, 23(12):186-187.
[7]乐杰.妇产科学[M].第6版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2004:381.
[8]花晓琳,张健,程利南.输卵管通畅性评价方法的研究进展[J].中华妇产科杂志, 2007, 42(8):571-573.
[9]肖艳,袁丽,丁波,等.四维子宫输卵管超声造影诊断不孕的价值研究[J].中国性科学, 2018, 27(2):118-120.
[10]李岗,闫娟,常芬琴.经阴道子宫输卵管四维超声造影评价输卵管通畅性的临床价值[J].临床医学研究与实践, 2017, 2(13):105-106, 108.
[11]罗海波,韩巧芳,谢玉环,等.经阴道子宫输卵管四维超声造影在不孕症诊断中应用价值[J].临床医学工程, 2015, 22(7):838-839, 842.
[2]李梁瑜,林艳,杨柳,等.经阴道四维子宫输卵管超声造影对输卵管通畅性评估价值分析[J].中医临床研究, 2018, 10(21):144-146.
[3]张蕊.经阴道三维、四维子宫输卵管超声造影诊断输卵管通畅性的价值[J].保健文汇, 2018,(8):252.
[4]陈粉红,陈伟,魏芳,等.联合应用经阴道四维和二维超声造影术诊断输卵管性不孕的价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志, 2015, 24(10):869-873.
[5]刘佳,俞磊.经阴道子宫输卵管四维超声造影评价输卵管通畅性的价值[J].海南医学, 2017, 28(24):4043-4046.
[6]李媛媛.经阴道子宫输卵管四维超声造影评价输卵管通畅性中的价值分析[J].临床研究, 2015, 23(12):186-187.
[7]乐杰.妇产科学[M].第6版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2004:381.
[8]花晓琳,张健,程利南.输卵管通畅性评价方法的研究进展[J].中华妇产科杂志, 2007, 42(8):571-573.
[9]肖艳,袁丽,丁波,等.四维子宫输卵管超声造影诊断不孕的价值研究[J].中国性科学, 2018, 27(2):118-120.
[10]李岗,闫娟,常芬琴.经阴道子宫输卵管四维超声造影评价输卵管通畅性的临床价值[J].临床医学研究与实践, 2017, 2(13):105-106, 108.
[11]罗海波,韩巧芳,谢玉环,等.经阴道子宫输卵管四维超声造影在不孕症诊断中应用价值[J].临床医学工程, 2015, 22(7):838-839, 842.