两种留置针穿刺方法在放化疗病人MRI增强扫描中的应用比较
|
摘要
目的通过对两种留置针穿刺方法可操作性、病人疼痛感、高压注射时的成功率等因素的比较分析,找出一种最适合放化疗后血管差的病人的穿刺方法,在减轻病人痛苦的同时提高检查成功率。方法选取放化疗数个疗程后行增强磁共振扫描患者80例,随机分为两组,对照组使用传统留置针穿刺法;观察组使用改良后的穿刺方法;分别从操作便捷性,病人疼痛分析,高压推注成功率3个角度予以比较。结果观察组需要两位操作人员协同才能完成该操作,观察组与对照组病人的平均疼痛程度差异均具有统计学意义(t=1.66,P<0.05),MRI增强扫描高压注射成功率差异具有统计学意义(t=13,t0.05/13=2.160,P<0.05)。结论使用改良后的留置针穿刺方法,在保证操作便捷性的同时,大幅减轻病人的疼痛感,提高了放化疗后病人留置针穿刺成功率,使磁共振增强扫描能够顺利完成。
Objective To find out the better puncture method for patients after several radiation and chemotherapy with a poor vascular condition,and to reduce patient 's pain and improve the successful rate.Methods Selected 80 patients who have already experienced several radiation and chemotherapy before.They were randomly divided into two groups: control group using traditional needle puncture; Observation group using improved puncture. Operating convenience,patient pain extent,successful rate of high pressure push were examined. Results Observation group needed two operators together to complete the operation. The difference in average pain degree between observation group and control group was statistically significant( t = 1. 66,P < 0. 05).MRI enhancement scanning high- pressure injection rate also had statistically significant differences( t =13,t0. 05 /13= 2. 160,P < 0. 05). Conclusion Modified method not only provides operation convenience,but also significantly reduces the pain of patients and improve the success rate of puncture to guarantee MRI enhancement scanning completely.
Objective To find out the better puncture method for patients after several radiation and chemotherapy with a poor vascular condition,and to reduce patient 's pain and improve the successful rate.Methods Selected 80 patients who have already experienced several radiation and chemotherapy before.They were randomly divided into two groups: control group using traditional needle puncture; Observation group using improved puncture. Operating convenience,patient pain extent,successful rate of high pressure push were examined. Results Observation group needed two operators together to complete the operation. The difference in average pain degree between observation group and control group was statistically significant( t = 1. 66,P < 0. 05).MRI enhancement scanning high- pressure injection rate also had statistically significant differences( t =13,t0. 05 /13= 2. 160,P < 0. 05). Conclusion Modified method not only provides operation convenience,but also significantly reduces the pain of patients and improve the success rate of puncture to guarantee MRI enhancement scanning completely.
引文
[1]景霜,张印斗.静脉留置针在MRI检查中的应用护理体会.[J].基层医学论坛,2013(09):139-141.
[2]洪美绥.改进静脉留置针置入在高压静脉注射中的应用.[J].福建医药杂志,2015(01):171-172.
[3]柴静.化疗性静脉损伤的预防与护理.[J].职业与健康.2002(02):162-163.
[4]匡大林.静脉留置针置管改进技术对穿刺成功率的影响[J].安徽医学,2014(01):125-127.
[5]王靖,邱亚平,张方兰.对老年患者两种静脉留置针穿刺置管方法的比较[J].黑龙江医药,2013(05):176-177.
[6]视觉模拟评分法[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2013(23):57.
[7]张宇.视觉模拟评分法对腹股沟疝无张力修补术中患者疼痛的评估[J].湖南中医药大学学报,2012(08):39-40.
[8]韦燕,陈彦凡,等.癌症疼痛评价教育对癌症疼痛患者治疗的影响[J].海南医学,2011(23):122-124.
[9]袁燕,杜松林,郑念华.高压注射器在磁共振增强时的应用[J].护士进修杂志,2007(05):81.
[10]朱秀玲,张今朝.优质护理对高压注射电子计算机断层扫描减少造影剂外漏的效果研究[J].检验医学与临床,2014(24):116-118.
[2]洪美绥.改进静脉留置针置入在高压静脉注射中的应用.[J].福建医药杂志,2015(01):171-172.
[3]柴静.化疗性静脉损伤的预防与护理.[J].职业与健康.2002(02):162-163.
[4]匡大林.静脉留置针置管改进技术对穿刺成功率的影响[J].安徽医学,2014(01):125-127.
[5]王靖,邱亚平,张方兰.对老年患者两种静脉留置针穿刺置管方法的比较[J].黑龙江医药,2013(05):176-177.
[6]视觉模拟评分法[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2013(23):57.
[7]张宇.视觉模拟评分法对腹股沟疝无张力修补术中患者疼痛的评估[J].湖南中医药大学学报,2012(08):39-40.
[8]韦燕,陈彦凡,等.癌症疼痛评价教育对癌症疼痛患者治疗的影响[J].海南医学,2011(23):122-124.
[9]袁燕,杜松林,郑念华.高压注射器在磁共振增强时的应用[J].护士进修杂志,2007(05):81.
[10]朱秀玲,张今朝.优质护理对高压注射电子计算机断层扫描减少造影剂外漏的效果研究[J].检验医学与临床,2014(24):116-118.