整体干预模式在宫颈癌伴梅毒护理中的应用效果
|
摘要
目的研究整体干预模式在宫颈癌伴梅毒护理中的应用效果。方法选取2015年1月至2018年3月医院收治的86例宫颈癌伴梅毒患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法将其分为对照组(43例)和研究组(43例)。对照组实施常规护理,研究组在常规护理的基础上实施整体干预模式。比较两组护理前、后生活质量、情绪状态、护理满意度及并发症发生情况。结果护理前,两组SF-36、HAMD、HAMA评分比较,差异均不显著(P>0.05);护理后,两组的SF-36评分均显著升高,且研究组均明显高于对照组(P<0.05);两组的HAMD、HAMA评分均显著降低,且研究组均明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组护理满意度明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组并发症总发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论整体干预模式在宫颈癌伴梅毒护理中的应用效果显著,其可明显改善患者生活质量,缓解负性情绪,提高护理满意度,降低并发症的发生率,值得临床推广与应用。
Objective To study the application effect of holistic intervention model in the nursing of cervical cancer with syphilis. Methods Eighty-six patients with cervical cancer with syphilis admitted in the hospital from January 2015 to March 2018 were selected as the study objects and divided into control group(43 cases) and research group(43 cases)according to the random number table method. The control group was given routine nursing, while the research group was given holistic intervention on the basis of routine nursing. The quality of life scores and negative emotional status before and after nursing, nursing satisfaction and inadence of complications were compared between the two groups. Results Before nursing, there were no significant differences in the scores of SF-36, HAMD and HAMA between the two groups(P>0.05); after nursing, the SF-36 scores of the two groups increased significantly, and those in the research group were significantly higher than the control group(P <0.05); the scores of HAMD and HAMA in both groups decreased significantly, and those in the research group were significantly lower than the control group(P <0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the research group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in the research group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P <0.05). Conclusion The application of holistic intervention model in the nursing of cervical cancer with syphilis has a significant effect. It can significantly improve the quality of life, eliminate negative emotions, increase nursing satisfaction, reduce the incidence of complications of patients, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
Objective To study the application effect of holistic intervention model in the nursing of cervical cancer with syphilis. Methods Eighty-six patients with cervical cancer with syphilis admitted in the hospital from January 2015 to March 2018 were selected as the study objects and divided into control group(43 cases) and research group(43 cases)according to the random number table method. The control group was given routine nursing, while the research group was given holistic intervention on the basis of routine nursing. The quality of life scores and negative emotional status before and after nursing, nursing satisfaction and inadence of complications were compared between the two groups. Results Before nursing, there were no significant differences in the scores of SF-36, HAMD and HAMA between the two groups(P>0.05); after nursing, the SF-36 scores of the two groups increased significantly, and those in the research group were significantly higher than the control group(P <0.05); the scores of HAMD and HAMA in both groups decreased significantly, and those in the research group were significantly lower than the control group(P <0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the research group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in the research group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P <0.05). Conclusion The application of holistic intervention model in the nursing of cervical cancer with syphilis has a significant effect. It can significantly improve the quality of life, eliminate negative emotions, increase nursing satisfaction, reduce the incidence of complications of patients, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
引文
[1]张环环.宫颈癌合并梅毒感染患者的护理效果观察[J].皮肤病与性病,2018,40(1):54-55.
[2]林芳,董世庆,刘春燕,等.综合护理干预在宫颈癌合并梅毒螺旋体阳性患者中的效果观察[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2018,25(5):612-615.
[3]张环环.宫颈癌合并梅毒感染者围手术期的护理效果分析[J].皮肤病与性病,2018,40(2):227-228.
[4]刘佳云,曾令瑜,陈雪蕾,等.宫颈癌合并梅毒螺旋体抗体阳性患者的临床分析与护理[J].护士进修杂志,2015,30(10):947-948.
[5]郭彩琴,吴慧莉.宫颈癌合并梅毒患者的心理特征及健康需求分析[J].中国肿瘤,2003,12(4):210-211.
[6]王春桃,夏立平,马书梅,等.宫颈癌及癌前病变患者梅毒抗体及白细胞分类检测分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2016,17(1):7-9.
[7]刘学勤,尹伶俐.综合性护理干预在宫颈癌患者三维适形放疗中的应用效果[J].首都食品与医药,2018,25(12):125.
[8]邹明如.整体护理干预对宫颈癌前病变及宫颈癌患者生活质量的影响[J].基层医学论坛,2018,22(18):2566,2575.
[9]郭静楠,谢卫琴.个体化家庭护理对于早期宫颈癌患者术后生活质量临床心得[J].浙江创伤外科,2018,23(3):623-624.
[10]程荣花.探讨心理行为干预对宫颈癌患者心理健康和生活质量的影响[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2018,26(8):1152-1156.
[11]佟亚娟,杨继红,王影.针对性护理干预对宫颈癌患者术后尿潴留的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2018,25(6):752-755.
[12]王霁,裴忠玲,邢华英,等.集束护理对宫颈癌放疗患者膀胱功能恢复效果研究[J].实用临床医药杂志,2018,22(12):106-108,116.
[2]林芳,董世庆,刘春燕,等.综合护理干预在宫颈癌合并梅毒螺旋体阳性患者中的效果观察[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2018,25(5):612-615.
[3]张环环.宫颈癌合并梅毒感染者围手术期的护理效果分析[J].皮肤病与性病,2018,40(2):227-228.
[4]刘佳云,曾令瑜,陈雪蕾,等.宫颈癌合并梅毒螺旋体抗体阳性患者的临床分析与护理[J].护士进修杂志,2015,30(10):947-948.
[5]郭彩琴,吴慧莉.宫颈癌合并梅毒患者的心理特征及健康需求分析[J].中国肿瘤,2003,12(4):210-211.
[6]王春桃,夏立平,马书梅,等.宫颈癌及癌前病变患者梅毒抗体及白细胞分类检测分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2016,17(1):7-9.
[7]刘学勤,尹伶俐.综合性护理干预在宫颈癌患者三维适形放疗中的应用效果[J].首都食品与医药,2018,25(12):125.
[8]邹明如.整体护理干预对宫颈癌前病变及宫颈癌患者生活质量的影响[J].基层医学论坛,2018,22(18):2566,2575.
[9]郭静楠,谢卫琴.个体化家庭护理对于早期宫颈癌患者术后生活质量临床心得[J].浙江创伤外科,2018,23(3):623-624.
[10]程荣花.探讨心理行为干预对宫颈癌患者心理健康和生活质量的影响[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2018,26(8):1152-1156.
[11]佟亚娟,杨继红,王影.针对性护理干预对宫颈癌患者术后尿潴留的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2018,25(6):752-755.
[12]王霁,裴忠玲,邢华英,等.集束护理对宫颈癌放疗患者膀胱功能恢复效果研究[J].实用临床医药杂志,2018,22(12):106-108,116.