腹腔镜筋膜内全子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术及阴式全宫切除术的比较
|
摘要
目的探讨腹腔镜筋膜内全子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术及阴式全宫切除术的临床治疗效果。方法以2012年1月~2014年1月本院收治的150例需接受子宫切除术进行治疗的患者为研究对象,将其随机分为A组、B组和C组。分别给予其腹腔镜筋膜内全子宫切除术、经腹全子宫切除术、阴式全宫切除术进行治疗,对比分析三组患者的临床治疗效果。结果 A组手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间、住院时间均少于B组、C组,P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义;并发症发生率低于B组、C组,P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论腹腔镜筋膜内全子宫切除术有较好的临床治疗效果,能缩短住院时间,有效促使患者康复。
Objective To explore Classical Intrafascial Supracervical Hysterectomy(CISH),Transabdominal Hysterectomy(TAH) and Transvaginal Hysterectomy(TVH) for clinical therapeutic effect. Methods In our hospital from January 2012 to January 2014 were 150 cases need to be treated with A hysterectomy for patients as the research object, its were randomly divided into group A and group B and group C. Give them respectively Classical Intrafascial Supracervical Hysterectomy,Transabdominal Hysterectomy and Transvaginal Hysterectomy for treatment.comparison and analysis of three groups of patients with clinical therapeutic effect. Results A set of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, anal exhaust time, length of hospital stay were significantly less than group B, group C,P < 0.05, the difference is statistically significant;The incidence of complications was lower than that in group B, group C, P < 0.05, the difference is statistically significant. Conclusion Classical Intrafascial Supracervical Hysterectomy has good clinical effect, can shorten the length of hospital stay, and can effectively promote the rehabilitation of patients.
Objective To explore Classical Intrafascial Supracervical Hysterectomy(CISH),Transabdominal Hysterectomy(TAH) and Transvaginal Hysterectomy(TVH) for clinical therapeutic effect. Methods In our hospital from January 2012 to January 2014 were 150 cases need to be treated with A hysterectomy for patients as the research object, its were randomly divided into group A and group B and group C. Give them respectively Classical Intrafascial Supracervical Hysterectomy,Transabdominal Hysterectomy and Transvaginal Hysterectomy for treatment.comparison and analysis of three groups of patients with clinical therapeutic effect. Results A set of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, anal exhaust time, length of hospital stay were significantly less than group B, group C,P < 0.05, the difference is statistically significant;The incidence of complications was lower than that in group B, group C, P < 0.05, the difference is statistically significant. Conclusion Classical Intrafascial Supracervical Hysterectomy has good clinical effect, can shorten the length of hospital stay, and can effectively promote the rehabilitation of patients.
引文
[1]钟颖芙.不同术式对子宫肌瘤患者术后生活质量影响研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2010,25(22):3220-3221.
[2]姬超,买苗,宋芳霞.腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术、腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术及经腹全子宫切除三种手术方式的比较及临床意义[J].吉林医学,2014,35(24):5401-5402.
[3]张韶珍,高玲.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除264例分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2011,26(2):183-184.
[4]傅柳陶.腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术的比较[J].安徽医药,2010,14(11):1313-1315.
[5]王玉琴,王建华.腹腔镜与经腹筋膜内子宫切除术的比较[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2010,19(12):1467-1467.
[6]谢朋木,冯良平,张永涛,等.改良腹腔镜下子宫次全切除术治疗子宫良性病变40例效果观察[J].山东医药,2012,52(7):86-88.
[2]姬超,买苗,宋芳霞.腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术、腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术及经腹全子宫切除三种手术方式的比较及临床意义[J].吉林医学,2014,35(24):5401-5402.
[3]张韶珍,高玲.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除264例分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2011,26(2):183-184.
[4]傅柳陶.腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术的比较[J].安徽医药,2010,14(11):1313-1315.
[5]王玉琴,王建华.腹腔镜与经腹筋膜内子宫切除术的比较[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2010,19(12):1467-1467.
[6]谢朋木,冯良平,张永涛,等.改良腹腔镜下子宫次全切除术治疗子宫良性病变40例效果观察[J].山东医药,2012,52(7):86-88.