摘要
以732名中国大学生为对象修订个人环境匹配创造力量表(Person Environment Fit Scale for Creativity, PEFSC)。结果表明:中文版PEFSC包括个人和环境2个维度,每个维度7个项目,共14个项目。验证性因素分析结果显示,2因素模型拟合良好(χ2/df=3.094,GFI=0.919,CFI=0.918,NFI=0.884,TLI=0.902,RMSEA=0.076),量表聚敛效度和区分效度良好。量表总分及其两个维度与威廉斯创造力倾向量表总分的相关系数在0.789~0.920之间。总量表及各维度的内部一致性信度系数分别为0.859、0.799、0.822,重测信度系数分别为0.911、0.840、0.831。总之,中文版PEFSC具有良好的信效度,可以作为测量中国大学生创造力的有效工具。
732 university students were asked to complete the Person Environment Fit Scale for Creativity(PEFSC)to examine the reliability and validity of it. The results showed that: The Chinese version of PEFSC consisted of 14 items, and exploratory factor analyses yielded two factors(person and environment);Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the two-factor model of PEFSC provided good fit with the data(χ~2/df=3.094,GFI=0.919,CFI=0.918,NFI=0.884,TLI=0.902,RMSEA=0.076). The Cronbach's α of all factors ranged from 0.799 to 0.859. The test-retest reliabilities ranged from 0.831 to 0.911. The PEFSC was of good criterion validity as well. The Chinese version of PEFSC is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the creativity of Chinese university students.
引文
贡喆,刘昌,沈汪兵.(2016).有关创造力测量的一些思考.心理科学进展,24(1),31-45.
韩丕国,武云鹏,高峰强.(2014).学前儿童羞怯量表教师卷的编制.心理研究,7(3),58-62.
江怀.(2011).大学生创造力量表的初步编制与现状调查研究.福州大学硕士学位论文.
邱皓政.(2009).量化研究与统计分析-SPSS中文视窗版数据分析范例解析.重庆:重庆大学出版社.
舒曾,贺琼,李晓敏等.(2016).母亲养育压力对幼儿创造性人格的影响:教养方式的中介作用.心理发展与教育,32(3),276-284.
王立高.(2016).民族地区应用型高校大学生创新精神现状调查与分析.中国成人教育,22,52-56.
温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特.(2004).结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则.心理学报,36(2),186-194.
吴明隆.(2010).问卷统计分析实务---操作与应用.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010.
吴明隆.(2013).结构方程模型---Amos实务进阶.重庆:重庆大学出版社.
肖影影,毕重增,狄轩康.(2013).一般自我效能感量表的性别与跨文化项目功能差异分析.心理研究,6(5),38-41.
Bacon D R.,Sauer,P.L.,&Young,M.(1995).Composite reliability in structural equations modeling.Educational and Psychological measurement,55(3),394-406.
Bagozzi,R.P.,Yi Y,&Phillips L W.(1991).Assessing construct validity in organizational research.Adaministrative Science Quaterly,36(3),421-458.
Cropley A.J.(2000).Defining and measuring creativity:Are creativity tests worth using?Roeper Review,23(2),72-79.
Csikszentmihalyi M.(1999).Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity.In R.J.Sternberg(Ed.),Handbook of creativity(pp.313-335).Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press.
Fornell C.,&Larcker D F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
Hair J F.,Tatham R L.,Anderson R E.,et al.(2014).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River,N J:Pearson Prentice Hall.
Pinheiro I.R.,&Cruz R.M.(2014).Mapping creativity:Creativity measurements network analysis.Creativity Research Journal,26(3),263-275.
Rego,A.,Marques,C.,Leal,S.,Sousa,F.,&Cunha,M.P.(2011).Psychological capital and performance of Portuguese civil servants:Exploring neutralizers in the context of an appraisal system.The International Journal of Human Resource Management,21(9),1531-1552.
Runco M.A.(2007).A hierarchical framework for the study of creativity.New Horizons in Education,55,1-9.
Sen S.,Acar S.,&Cetinkaya C.(2014).Development of the Person-Environment Fit Scale(PEFSC):A new measure of creativity.Psychology of Aesthetics,Creativity,and the Arts,18(4),433-445.
Sternberg R.J.,&Lubart T.I.(1996).Investing in creativity.American Psychologist,51(7),677-688.
Torkzadeh H G.,Koufteros X.,&Pflughoeft K.(2003).Confirmatory analysis of computer self-efficacy.Structural Equations Modeling,10(2),263-275.