儿科护理风险因素及护理措施干预效果分析
|
摘要
目的分析儿科护理风险因素,探讨护理措施。方法将我院儿科2016年6月—2017年5月收治的150例患儿作为对照组,将2017年6月—2018年6月收治的150例患儿作为观察组。对照组实施常规护理,观察组针对儿科护理风险分析,实施针对性护理措施,对比两组不良事件发生情况和家长满意度。结果观察组患儿治疗过程不良事件发生率低于对照组;观察组家长对护理工作的满意度高于对照组,组间对比差异有统计学意义,P <0.05。结论重视儿科护理风险,探讨护理措施进行积极干预,能够提高护理质量和儿科治疗安全性,促进家长对儿科医护工作更加满意。
Objective To analyze the risk factors of pediatric nursing and explore nursing measures. Methods 150 children in pediatrics department from June 2016 to May 2017 were taken as control group and 150 children admitted from June 2017 to June 2018 as observation group. The control group was given routine nursing, the observation group was based on the risk analysis of paediatric nursing, the targeted nursing measures were carried out, and the incidence of adverse events and parents' satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of adverse events in the treatment process in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the satisfaction of parents in the observation group was higher than that in the control group. There was statistical significance, P < 0.05. Conclusion Paying attention to the risk of paediatric nursing and probing into the positive intervention of nursing measures can improve the nursing quality and the safety of paediatric treatment and promote parents' satisfaction with the work of pediatric nursing care.
Objective To analyze the risk factors of pediatric nursing and explore nursing measures. Methods 150 children in pediatrics department from June 2016 to May 2017 were taken as control group and 150 children admitted from June 2017 to June 2018 as observation group. The control group was given routine nursing, the observation group was based on the risk analysis of paediatric nursing, the targeted nursing measures were carried out, and the incidence of adverse events and parents' satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of adverse events in the treatment process in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the satisfaction of parents in the observation group was higher than that in the control group. There was statistical significance, P < 0.05. Conclusion Paying attention to the risk of paediatric nursing and probing into the positive intervention of nursing measures can improve the nursing quality and the safety of paediatric treatment and promote parents' satisfaction with the work of pediatric nursing care.
引文
[1]徐启文.儿科护理风险管理问题及防范[J].中国卫生产业,2018,15(13):12-13.
[2]余启梅.儿科护理风险原因分析及防范[J].基层医学论坛,2016,20(11):1591-1592.
[3]段桂仙.儿科临床用药安全护理风险管理[J].儿科药学杂志,2015,21(6):47-49.
[4]胡颖,胡楠,尚楠.浅析细节管理在儿科护理管理中的应用[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(20):237-238.
[5]王姣.儿科护理风险因素分析及防范对策[J].护理实践与研究,2016,13(2):116-117.
[6]高建莉,霍红炜,齐金华.儿科门诊输液的细节护理及效果观察[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(14):233-234.
[7]高蕾.儿科护理中的人性化护理分析[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(12):193-194.
[8]李莲花.细节护理在消化内科护理中的应用[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(18):252-253.
[9]李晓果.儿科护理细节中引起护理纠纷的原因与防范对策[J].首都食品与医药,2018,25(23):159.
[10]毛贤荣.风险防范式护理在儿科护理中的应用[J].中国民康医学,2018,30(19):127-128.
[11]刘芳芳.风险防范式护理应用对儿科护理管理质量的影响[J].中国社区医师,2018,34(27):147-148.
[12]陆群峰,邵珍珍,陈文健,等.儿科护理风险预警敏感指标体系的构建[J].上海护理,2018,18(9):72-75.
[2]余启梅.儿科护理风险原因分析及防范[J].基层医学论坛,2016,20(11):1591-1592.
[3]段桂仙.儿科临床用药安全护理风险管理[J].儿科药学杂志,2015,21(6):47-49.
[4]胡颖,胡楠,尚楠.浅析细节管理在儿科护理管理中的应用[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(20):237-238.
[5]王姣.儿科护理风险因素分析及防范对策[J].护理实践与研究,2016,13(2):116-117.
[6]高建莉,霍红炜,齐金华.儿科门诊输液的细节护理及效果观察[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(14):233-234.
[7]高蕾.儿科护理中的人性化护理分析[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(12):193-194.
[8]李莲花.细节护理在消化内科护理中的应用[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(18):252-253.
[9]李晓果.儿科护理细节中引起护理纠纷的原因与防范对策[J].首都食品与医药,2018,25(23):159.
[10]毛贤荣.风险防范式护理在儿科护理中的应用[J].中国民康医学,2018,30(19):127-128.
[11]刘芳芳.风险防范式护理应用对儿科护理管理质量的影响[J].中国社区医师,2018,34(27):147-148.
[12]陆群峰,邵珍珍,陈文健,等.儿科护理风险预警敏感指标体系的构建[J].上海护理,2018,18(9):72-75.