文化批判与理论熔铸——荀子在齐鲁文化合流中的作用
|
摘要
齐鲁文化合流分为三个阶段。在合流的后两个阶段,荀子主要发挥了文化批判与理论熔铸的巨大作用。他从解构与重构的道统、传经与弘道的学统、建构与影响"礼义之统"政统三个维度对儒家"三统"的形成、传承做出了重要贡献,也对齐鲁文化合流作出了卓越贡献。具体言之,荀子将齐鲁文化中的儒家、墨家、齐法家等理论进行了解构与重构。齐学与鲁学构成了经学的传授主体。而荀子在儒家经典的传授谱系中占据相当重要的地位,发挥了不可替代的重要作用。他还将齐国与鲁国的治国理念进行了批判与熔铸,形成了"礼义之统"的政治制度建构,构成了从先秦到两汉政治体制历史性转换中的重要一环。
The confluence of Qi and Lu culture can be divided into three stages. In the last two stages,Hsun-Tzu plays a great role in cultural criticism and theoretical integration. He makes a remarkable contribution to the formation and inheritance of the Confucian "Three Systems"from three dimensions,including the deconstruction and reconstruction of the Confucian Doctrine System,the dissemination and promotion of the Confucian Academic System,and the construction of"the controlling of propriety and righteousness"of the Confucian political tradition.He also contributes a lot to Qi and Lu culture. Specifically,Hsun-Tzu deconstructs and reconstructs the theories of Confucianism,Mohism and Qi Legalists in Qi and Lu Culture that forms the subject of the teaching of Confucian classics. Hsun-Tzu occupies a very important position in the classical transmission spectrum,and plays an irreplaceable role in the inheritance of intellectual traditions. He also criticizes and integrates Qi 's and Lu 's governance idea,forming a construction of "the controlling of propriety and righteousness"system. Thus,we can say he constitutes an important part of the historic transformation from the Pre-Qin to the Han political system.
The confluence of Qi and Lu culture can be divided into three stages. In the last two stages,Hsun-Tzu plays a great role in cultural criticism and theoretical integration. He makes a remarkable contribution to the formation and inheritance of the Confucian "Three Systems"from three dimensions,including the deconstruction and reconstruction of the Confucian Doctrine System,the dissemination and promotion of the Confucian Academic System,and the construction of"the controlling of propriety and righteousness"of the Confucian political tradition.He also contributes a lot to Qi and Lu culture. Specifically,Hsun-Tzu deconstructs and reconstructs the theories of Confucianism,Mohism and Qi Legalists in Qi and Lu Culture that forms the subject of the teaching of Confucian classics. Hsun-Tzu occupies a very important position in the classical transmission spectrum,and plays an irreplaceable role in the inheritance of intellectual traditions. He also criticizes and integrates Qi 's and Lu 's governance idea,forming a construction of "the controlling of propriety and righteousness"system. Thus,we can say he constitutes an important part of the historic transformation from the Pre-Qin to the Han political system.
引文
[1]郭沫若.十批判书[M].北京:东方出版社,1996.
[2]侯外庐.中国古代思想学说史[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1998.
[3]童书业.先秦七子思想研究[M].济南:齐鲁书社,1982.
[4]王志民.齐鲁文化与中华文明:王志民学术讲演录[M].北京:人民出版社,2015.
[5]陈来.古代宗教与伦理:儒家思想的根源(增订本)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2017.
[6]刘蔚华、苗润田.稷下学史[M].北京:中国广播电视出版社,1992.
[7]郭墨兰、吕世忠.齐文化研究[M].济南:齐鲁书社,2006.
[8]司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,2009.
[9]葛兆光.中国思想史:第一卷[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2015.
[10]王先谦.沈啸寰、王星贤点校.荀子集解[M].北京:中华书局,2012.
[11]王天海.荀子校释[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2005.
[12]杨伯峻.孟子译注[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
[13]徐复观.中国人性论史[M].上海:上海三联书店,2001.
[14][汉]班固撰.颜师古注.汉书:第十一册[M].北京:中华书局,1962.
[15]汪中.述学.内外篇.补遗.别录(二册)[M].北京:中华书局,1991.
[16]周予同原著.朱维铮编校.中国经学史讲义(外二种)[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2012.
[17]王纪东、杨朝明.《孔子家语》对荀学研究的意义[J].中国哲学史,2014(1):36-39.
[18]牟宗三.中国哲学十九讲[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1997.
[19]胡新生.先秦政治思想史的道义与功利之争[J].文史哲,2017(3):41-57.
[20]张祥龙.拒秦兴汉和应对佛教的儒家哲学——从董仲舒到陆象山[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2012.
[21][魏]王弼撰.楼宇烈校释.周易注校释[M].北京:中华书局,2012.
[22]牟宗三.历史哲学[M].长春:吉林出版集团,2010.
[23]劳思光.新编中国哲学史(二)[M].北京:三联书店,2015.
[24]徐复观.两汉思想史(二)[M].北京:九州出版社,2014.
[25]梁涛.中国政治哲学史(第一卷)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2017.
[26]李泽厚.中国古代思想史论[M].北京:人民出版社,1986.
[2]侯外庐.中国古代思想学说史[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1998.
[3]童书业.先秦七子思想研究[M].济南:齐鲁书社,1982.
[4]王志民.齐鲁文化与中华文明:王志民学术讲演录[M].北京:人民出版社,2015.
[5]陈来.古代宗教与伦理:儒家思想的根源(增订本)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2017.
[6]刘蔚华、苗润田.稷下学史[M].北京:中国广播电视出版社,1992.
[7]郭墨兰、吕世忠.齐文化研究[M].济南:齐鲁书社,2006.
[8]司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,2009.
[9]葛兆光.中国思想史:第一卷[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2015.
[10]王先谦.沈啸寰、王星贤点校.荀子集解[M].北京:中华书局,2012.
[11]王天海.荀子校释[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2005.
[12]杨伯峻.孟子译注[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
[13]徐复观.中国人性论史[M].上海:上海三联书店,2001.
[14][汉]班固撰.颜师古注.汉书:第十一册[M].北京:中华书局,1962.
[15]汪中.述学.内外篇.补遗.别录(二册)[M].北京:中华书局,1991.
[16]周予同原著.朱维铮编校.中国经学史讲义(外二种)[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2012.
[17]王纪东、杨朝明.《孔子家语》对荀学研究的意义[J].中国哲学史,2014(1):36-39.
[18]牟宗三.中国哲学十九讲[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1997.
[19]胡新生.先秦政治思想史的道义与功利之争[J].文史哲,2017(3):41-57.
[20]张祥龙.拒秦兴汉和应对佛教的儒家哲学——从董仲舒到陆象山[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2012.
[21][魏]王弼撰.楼宇烈校释.周易注校释[M].北京:中华书局,2012.
[22]牟宗三.历史哲学[M].长春:吉林出版集团,2010.
[23]劳思光.新编中国哲学史(二)[M].北京:三联书店,2015.
[24]徐复观.两汉思想史(二)[M].北京:九州出版社,2014.
[25]梁涛.中国政治哲学史(第一卷)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2017.
[26]李泽厚.中国古代思想史论[M].北京:人民出版社,1986.