The resistance of
Helicobacter pylori to
antibiotics has increased the need for new empirical, first-line treatments. However, the efficacy of sequential therapy (ST) and concomitant therapy (CT) compared with
triple therapy (TT) has not been adequately evaluated.
Aim
In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of these empirical three regimens.
Methods
The 517 patients enrolled in the study were prospectively randomized to receive 10 days of TT (n = 171), ST (n = 170), and CT (n = 176) at 5 university-affiliated hospitals from May 2013 to March 2015. The post-treatment H. pylori status was determined using the 13C-urea breath test.
Results
The baseline characteristics were similar among the three groups. The intention-to-treat eradication rates were 62.6%, 70.6%, and 77.8% in the TT, ST, and CT groups, respectively (p < 0.01). The corresponding per-protocol eradication rates were 82.8%, 89.5%, and 94.4%, respectively (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the compliance, side effects, and follow-up loss rates.
Conclusion
A higher eradication rate was achieved with empirical 10-day ST, and CT than with the TT regimen, with similar rates of compliance and treatment side effects.
