文摘
Post-operative follow-up after internal fixation of fractures is a common practice. The goal of this study was to evaluate the necessity of a routine follow-up visit after internal fixation of a proximal femoral fracture. Our hypothesis is that these follow-up visits do not result in a change in the treatment plan, but add an extra cost to the health care system and lead to the purposeless utilisation of limited resources.Patients and methodsA retrospective study of 428 consecutive patients (431 fractures) with a scheduled outpatient clinic visit after internal fixation of proximal femoral fractures in a single hospital during years 2012–2013. We noted any changes in the patients’ treatment plans based on the first follow-up visits, including scheduled visits up to ten weeks after internal fixation.ResultsNone of the patients showed signs of infection, implant failure or loss of reduction requiring re-operation at the scheduled follow-up visit. In only one (0.23%) visit a change in treatment plan was made as a result of the scheduled follow-up visit (decision to remove the distal screws from the long intramedullary nail to obtain dynamic compression). Scheduled visits did not occur for the following reasons, death (11.8%), visit to emergency department prior scheduled visit (3.2%), and not known (3.9%).ConclusionsThe first scheduled visit within ten weeks after internal fixation of a proximal femoral fracture leads to no changes in treatment. We recommend considering the need of these follow-up visits.
