| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences
Objectives
This study sought to evaluate whether supra-aortic angiography during preparatory balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) improves valve sizing.
Background
Current recommendations for valve size selection are based on annular measurements by transesophageal echocardiography and computed tomography, but paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) is a frequent problem.
Methods
Data of 270 consecutive patients with either conventional sizing (group 1, n?= 167) or balloon aortic valvuloplasty-based sizing (group 2, n?= 103) were compared. PAR was graded angiographically and quantitatively using several hemodynamic indices.
Results
PAR was observed in 113 patients of group 1 and 41 patients of group 2 (67.7 % vs. 39.8 % , p?<?0.001). More than mild PAR was found in 24 (14.4 % ) patients of group 1 and 8 (7.8 % ) patients of group 2. According to pre-interventional imaging, 40 (39 % ) patients had a borderline annulus size, raising uncertainty regarding valve size selection. Balloon sizing resulted in selection of the bigger prosthesis in 30 (29 % ) and the smaller prosthesis in the remaining patients, and only 1 of these 40 patients had more than mild PAR. As predicted by the hemodynamic indices of PAR, mortality at 30 days and 1 year was less in group 2 than in group 1 (5.8 % vs. 9 % , p?= 0.2 and 10.6 % vs. 20 % , p?= 0.01).
Conclusions
Preparatory balloon aortic valvuloplasty during transcatheter aortic valve implantation improves valve size selection, reduces the associated PAR, and increases survival in borderline cases.
