Study ObjectiveTo compare the anesthetic effects of two different concentrations and doses of ropivacaine (0.2 % and 0.25 % ) with those of a conventional dose of lidocaine 0.5 % .Design
Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, clinical investigation.
Setting
Large metropolitan university hospital.
Patients
66 adult ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing forearm and hand surgery.
Interventions
Patients were randomly allocated to three groups to receive intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA). Study groups were: ropivacaine 0.2 % (Group I, n = 22), ropivacaine 0.25 % (Group II, n = 22), and lidocaine 0.5 % (Group III, n = 22).
Measurements
Tourniquet tolerance times and regression of sensory analgesia were noted. Verbal numerical pain scores (VNS), cumulative analgesic consumption, and side effects were recorded during surgery and postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Time to first pain medication intake and number of patients receiving analgesics in the PACU were recorded.
Main Results
Additional tolerance times for the distal tourniquet were significantly higher in the ropivacaine 0.25 % group than the other two groups. Regression of sensory anesthesia was fastest in the lidocaine group. During the PACU stay, VNSs were significantly lower in the first 20 minutes in the ropivacaine groups than the lidocaine group. Time to first intake of pain medication in the PACU was soonest in the lidocaine group. The number of patients given analgesics in the PACU was highest in the lidocaine group. The number of patients taking > two tablets of tramadol was significantly lowest in the ropivacaine 0.25 % group. No serious side effects were observed in any study group.
Conclusion
Longer tolerance times for the distal tourniquet, prolonged analgesia after tourniquet release, and lower analgesic requirements postoperatively make ropivacaine 0.2 % and 0.25 % an alternative to lidocaine for IVRA.
