A comparison of the performance of the Braden Q and the Glamorgan paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in general and intensive care paediatric and neonatal units

设为首页

收藏本站

网站地图 | English | 公务邮箱

About the library

Background
History
Leadership
Organization

Readers' Guide

Opening Hours
Collections
Help Via Email

Publications

Electronic Information Resources

A comparison of the performance of the Braden Q and the Glamorgan paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in general and intensive care paediatric and neonatal units

详细信息查看全文

作者：Jane Willock^a ; ^{willock@tesco.net" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Laila Habiballah^b ; ^{lailahabeeb2007@yahoo.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Deborah Long^c ; ^{Debbie.Long2@health.qld.gov.au" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Kelli Palmer^d ; ^{Kelli.Palmer@health.qld.gov.au" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Denis Anthony^e ; ^f ; ^{d.anthony@leeds.ac.uk" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}
关键词：Children ; Risk assessment ; Pressure ulcers
刊名：Journal of Tissue Viability
出版年：2016
出版时间：May 2016
年：2016
卷：25
期：2
页码：119-126
全文大小：298 K

文摘

•: There are several risk paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scales.
•: The Glamorgan and Braden Q scales appear to work well with neonatal, paediatric intensive care and general children's wards.
•: There is some evidence Braden Q may be better in general paediatrics.