Impact of practice patterns in shunt use during carotid endarterectomy with contralateral carotid occlusion

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Philip P. Goodney ; MD ; MS^a ; ^b ; ^{philip.goodney@hitchcock.org} ; Jessica B. Wallaert ; MD^a ; Salvatore T. Scali ; MD^c ; David H. Stone ; MD^a ; Virendra Patel ; MD^d ; Palma Shaw ; MD^e ; Brian W. Nolan ; MD ; MS^a ; ^b ; Jack L. Cronenwett ; MD^a ; ^b ; Vascular Study Group of New England
• 刊名：Journal of Vascular Surgery
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：January 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：55
• 期：1
• 页码：61-71.e1
• 全文大小：1002 K

文摘

| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Purpose

This study investigated the association between surgeon practice pattern in shunt placement and 30-day stroke/death in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO).

Methods

Among 6379 CEAs performed in the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) between 2002 and 2009, we identified 353 patients who underwent CEA with CCO and compared the 30-day stroke/death rate with 5279 patients who underwent primary, isolated CEA with a patent contralateral carotid artery. Within patients with CCO, we examined the 30-day stroke/death rate across the reason for shunt placement and two distinct surgeon practice patterns in shunt placement: surgeons who selectively used a shunt (?5 % of CEAs) or routinely used a shunt (>95 % of CEAs). We used observed/expected (O/E) ratios to provide risk-adjusted comparisons across groups.

Results

Of 353 patients with CCO, 118 (33 % ) underwent CEA without a shunt, 173 (49 % ) underwent CEA using a shunt placed routinely, and 62 (18 % ) had a shunt placed for a neurologic indication. Rates of 30-day stroke/death across categories of reason for shunt use were no shunt, 3.4 % ; routine shunt, 4.0 % ; and shunt for indication, 4.8 % (P = .891). The risk of 30-day stroke/death was higher for surgeons who selectively placed shunts (5.6 % ) in all their CEAs and lower for surgeons who routinely placed shunts (1.5 % , P = .05). The risk of 30-day stroke/death was >1 in patients undergoing selective shunting (O/E ratio, 1.4; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.7) and <1 for surgeons who placed shunts routinely (O/E ratio, 0.4; 95 % CI, 0.2-0.9). Stroke/death rates were lowest when individual surgeons' intraoperative decisions reflected their usual pattern of practice: 1.5 % stroke/death rate when ¡°routine?surgeons placed a shunt, 3.4 % when ¡°selective?surgeons did not place a shunt, and 7.6 % stroke/death rate for ¡°selective?surgeons who placed a shunt (P = .05 for trend).

Conclusions

The risk of 30-day stroke/death is higher in CEA in patients with CCO than with a patent contralateral carotid artery. Surgeons who place shunts selectively during CEA have higher rates of stroke/death in patients with CCO. This suggests that shunt use for CCO during CEA is associated with fewer complications, but only if the surgeon uses a shunt as part of his or her routine practice in CEA. Surgeons should preoperatively consider their own practice pattern in shunt use when faced with a patient who may require shunt placement.