| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences
Purpose
To evaluate the effect of reducing the number of visual acuity measurements made in a defocus curve on the quality of data quantified.
Setting
Midland Eye, Solihull, United Kingdom.
Design
Evaluation of a technique.
Methods
Defocus curves were constructed by measuring visual acuity on a distance logMAR letter chart, randomizing the test letters between lens presentations. The lens powers evaluated ranged between +1.50 diopters (D) and ?5.00 D in 0.50 D steps, which were also presented in a randomized order. Defocus curves were measured binocularly with the Tecnis diffractive, Rezoom refractive, Lentis rotationally asymmetric segmented (+3.00 D addition [add]), and Finevision trifocal multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted bilaterally, and also for the diffractive IOL and refractive or rotationally asymmetric segmented (+3.00 D and +1.50 D adds) multifocal IOLs implanted contralaterally. Relative and absolute range of clear-focus metrics and area?metrics were calculated for curves fitted using 0.50 D, 1.00 D, and 1.50 D steps and a near add-specific profile (ie, distance, half the near add, and the full near-add powers).
Results
A significant difference in simulated results was found in at least 1 of the relative or absolute range of clear-focus or area metrics for each of the multifocal designs examined when the defocus-curve step size was increased (P<.05).
Conclusion
Faster methods of capturing defocus curves from multifocal IOL designs appear to distort the metric results and are therefore not valid.
Financial Disclosure
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
