| Fi
gures/TablesFi
gures/Tables | ReferencesReferencesg=""UTF-8""?>
Purpose
The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the consistency of the reportin
g of clinical and radio
graphic outcomes after arthroscopic mana
gement of femoroacetabular impin
gement (FAI).
Methods
Two databases (Medline and EMBASE) were screened for clinical studies involving the arthroscopic management of FAI. A full-text review of eligible studies was conducted, and the references were searched. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to the searched studies, and a quality assessment was completed for included studies.
Results
We identified 29 eligible studies involving 2,816 patients. There was a lack of consensus with regard to reported outcomes (clinical and radiographic) after arthroscopic treatment of FAI. Clinical outcomes reported include the Harris Hip Score (45 % ) and the Non-Arthritic Hip Scale (28 % ), range of motion (34 % ), pain scores (24 % ), and patient satisfaction (28 % ). The most commonly reported radiographic outcomes included the alpha angle (38 % ), head-neck offset (14 % ), and degenerative changes (21 % ).
Conclusions
There is significant variation in reported clinical and radiographic outcomes after arthroscopic treatment of FAI. This study highlights the need for consistent outcome reporting after arthroscopic FAI surgery.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, systematic review of Level II, III, and IV studies.