We investigated the effects of small focal spot (SFS) imaging and iterative model reconstruction (IMR) on the image quality of computed tomography angiographs (CTA) in patients with peripheral arterial disease.
Materials and Methods
We divided 60 consecutive patients with suspected or confirmed peripheral artery disease into two equal groups. One group underwent large focal spot scanning under our standard CTA protocol with hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose4) (protocol 1), and the other underwent scanning with the SFS protocol and IMR (protocol 2). Quantitative image quality parameters, ie, arterial computed tomography attenuation, image noise, and the contrast-to-noise ratio, were compared and the visual image quality (depiction of each vessel) was scored on a 5-point scale.
Results
There was no significant difference in the arterial attenuation among all evaluated slice levels. The mean image noise was significantly lower under protocol 2 and the contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher at all slice levels. The visual scores assigned to the two protocols for the depiction of large vessels, such as the abdominal aorta and iliac artery, were comparable. However, the mean visual scores for small vessels in the lower extremities were significantly higher under protocol 2.
Conclusion
CTA with SFS and IMR yielded significantly better qualitative and quantitative image quality especially for small vessels.
