| |
An ontology approach to comparative phenomics in plants
- 作者:Anika Oellrich (1)
Ramona L Walls (2) Ethalinda KS Cannon (3) Steven B Cannon (4) (5) Laurel Cooper (6) Jack Gardiner (7) Georgios V Gkoutos (8) Lisa Harper (4) Mingze He (7) Robert Hoehndorf (9) Pankaj Jaiswal (6) Scott R Kalberer (4) John P Lloyd (10) David Meinke (11) Naama Menda (12) Laura Moore (6) Rex T Nelson (4) Anuradha Pujar (12) Carolyn J Lawrence (5) (7) Eva Huala (13)
1. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute ; Wellcome Trust Genome Campus ; Hinxton ; CB10 1SA ; UK 2. iPlant Collaborative ; University of Arizona ; 1657 E. Helen St. ; Tucson ; Arizona ; 85721 ; USA 3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa State University ; 1018 Crop Informatics Lab ; Ames ; Iowa ; 50011 ; USA 4. USDA-ARS Corn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit ; Iowa State University ; Crop Genome Informatics Lab ; Iowa State University ; Ames ; IA ; 50011 ; USA 5. Department of Agronomy ; Agronomy Hall ; Iowa State University ; Ames ; IA ; 50010 ; USA 6. Department of Botany and Plant Pathology ; 2082 Cordley Hall ; Oregon State University ; Corvallis ; OR ; 97331 ; USA 7. Department of Genetics ; Development and Cell Biology ; Roy J Carver Co-Laboratory ; Iowa State University ; Ames ; IA ; 50010 ; USA 8. Department of Computer Science ; Aberystwyth University ; Llandinam Building ; Aberystwyth ; SY23 3DB ; UK 9. Computer ; Electrical and Mathematical Sciences & Engineering Division and Computational Bioscience Research Center ; King Abdullah University of Science and Technology ; 4700 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology ; P.O. Box 2882 ; Thuwal ; 23955-6900 ; Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 10. Department of Plant Biology ; Michigan State University ; 220 Trowbridge Rd ; East Lansing ; MI ; 48824 ; USA 11. Department of Botany ; Oklahoma State University ; 301 Physical Sciences ; Stillwater ; OK ; 74078 ; USA 12. Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research ; 533 Tower Road ; Ithaca ; NY ; 14853 ; USA 13. Phoenix Bioinformatics ; 643 Bair Island Rd Suite 403 ; Redwood City ; CA ; 94063 ; USA
- 刊名:Plant Methods
- 出版年:2015
- 出版时间:December 2015
- 年:2015
- 卷:11
- 期:1
- 全文大小:1,894 KB
- 参考文献:Research at the Intersection of the Physical and Life Sciences. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C
1. Benfey, PN, Mitchell-Olds, T (2008) From genotype to phenotype: systems biology meets natural variation. Science 320: pp. 495-7 CrossRef 2. Groth, P, Weiss, B, Pohlenz, H-D, Leser, U (2008) Mining phenotypes for gene function prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9: pp. 136 CrossRef 3. Gkoutos, GV, Schofield, PN, Hoehndorf, R (2012) Computational tools for comparative phenomics: the role and promise of ontologies. Mamm Genome Off J Int Mamm Genome Soc 23: pp. 669-79 CrossRef 4. Doelken, SC, K枚hler, S, Mungall, CJ, Gkoutos, GV, Ruef, BJ, Smith, C (2013) Phenotypic overlap in the contribution of individual genes to CNV pathogenicity revealed by cross-species computational analysis of single-gene mutations in humans, mice and zebrafish. Dis Model Mech 6: pp. 358-72 CrossRef 5. Deans, AR, Lewis, SE, Huala, E, Anzaldo, SS, Ashburner, M, Balhoff, JP (2015) Finding our way through phenotypes. PLoS Biol 13: pp. e1002033 CrossRef 6. Hartl, DL, Jones, EW (2006) Essential genetics: s genomics perspective. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, Massachusettes, USA 7. Wikipedia phenotype article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenotype] 8. York, LM, Nord, E, Lynch, J (2013) Integration of root phenes for soil resource acquisition. Funct Plant Ecol 4: pp. 355 9. Serebrovsky, AS (1925) 鈥淪omatic segregation鈥?in domestic fowl. J Genet 16: pp. 33-42 CrossRef 10. Denny, JC, Bastarache, L, Ritchie, MD, Carroll, RJ, Zink, R, Mosley, JD (2013) Systematic comparison of phenome-wide association study of electronic medical record data and genome-wide association study data. Nat Biotechnol 31: pp. 1102-11 CrossRef 11. Zemojtel, T, K枚hler, S, Mackenroth, L, J盲ger, M, Hecht, J, Krawitz, P (2014) Effective diagnosis of genetic disease by computational phenotype analysis of the disease-associated genome. Sci Transl Med 6: pp. 252ra123 CrossRef 12. Hoehndorf, R, Schofield, PN, Gkoutos, GV (2013) An integrative, translational approach to understanding rare and orphan genetically based diseases. Interface Focus 3: pp. 20120055 CrossRef 13. Hoehndorf, R, Dumontier, M, Gkoutos, GV (2013) Evaluation of research in biomedical ontologies. Brief Bioinform 14: pp. 696-712 CrossRef 14. Bombarely, A, Menda, N, Tecle, IY, Buels, RM, Strickler, S, Fischer-York, T (2010) The Sol Genomics Network (solgenomics.net): growing tomatoes using Perl. Nucleic Acids Res 39: pp. D1149-55 CrossRef 15. Gkoutos, GV, Green, ECJ, Mallon, AM, Hancock, JM, Davidson, D (2005) Using ontologies to describe mouse phenotypes. Genome Biol 6: pp. R8 CrossRef 16. Dahdul, WM, Balhoff, JP, Engeman, J, Grande, T, Hilton, EJ, Kothari, C (2010) Evolutionary characters, phenotypes and ontologies: curating data from the systematic biology literature. PLoS One 5: pp. e10708 CrossRef 17. K枚hler, S, Doelken, SC, Mungall, CJ, Bauer, S, Firth, HV, Bailleul-Forestier, I (2013) The Human Phenotype Ontology project: linking molecular biology and disease through phenotype data. Nucleic Acids Res 42: pp. D966-D974 CrossRef 18. Mungall, C, Gkoutos, GV, Smith, C, Haendel, M, Lewis, S, Ashburner, M (2010) Integrating phenotype ontologies across multiple species. Genome Biol 11: pp. R2 CrossRef 19. Knowlton, MN, Li, T, Ren, Y, Bill, BR, Ellis, LB, Ekker, SC (2008) A PATO-compliant zebrafish screening database (MODB): management of morpholino knockdown screen information. BMC Bioinformatics 9: pp. 7 CrossRef 20. Pesquita, C, Faria, D, Falc茫o, AO, Lord, P, Couto, FM (2009) Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies. PLoS Comput Biol 5: pp. e1000443 CrossRef 21. Mistry, M, Pavlidis, P (2008) Gene ontology term overlap as a measure of gene functional similarity. BMC Bioinformatics 9: pp. 327 CrossRef 22. Gan, M, Dou, X, Jiang, R (2013) From ontology to semantic similarity: calculation of ontology-based semantic similarity. ScientificWorldJournal 2013: pp. 793091 CrossRef 23. Hoehndorf, R, Hancock, JM, Hardy, NW, Mallon, A-M, Schofield, PN, Gkoutos, GV (2014) Analyzing gene expression data in mice with the Neuro Behavior Ontology. Mamm Genome Off J Int Mamm Genome Soc 25: pp. 32-40 CrossRef 24. Hoehndorf, R, Hiebert, T, Hardy, NW, Schofield, PN, Gkoutos, GV, Dumontier, M (2014) Mouse model phenotypes provide information about human drug targets. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 30: pp. 719-25 CrossRef 25. Walls, RL, Athreya, B, Cooper, L, Elser, J, Gandolfo, MA, Jaiswal, P (2012) Ontologies as integrative tools for plant science. Am J Bot 99: pp. 1263-75 CrossRef 26. Cooper, L, Walls, RL, Elser, J, Gandolfo, MA, Stevenson, DW, Smith, B (2013) The plant ontology as a tool for comparative plant anatomy and genomic analyses. Plant Cell Physiol 54: pp. e1-1 CrossRef 27. Ashburner, M, Ball, CA, Blake, JA, Botstein, D, Butler, H, Cherry, JM (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nat Genet 25: pp. 25-9 CrossRef The gene ontology: enhancements for 2011. Nucleic Acids Res 40: pp. D559-64 CrossRef 28. Schaeffer, ML, Harper, LC, Gardiner, JM, Andorf, CM, Campbell, DA, Cannon, EKS (2011) MaizeGDB: curation and outreach go hand-in-hand. Database J Biol Databases Curation 2011: pp. bar022 29. Maize Genetics and Genomics Database [http://maizegdb.org/] 30. Yamazaki, Y, Sakaniwa, S, Tsuchiya, R, Nonomura, K-I, Kurata, N (2010) Oryzabase: an integrated information resource for rice science. Breed Sci 60: pp. 544-8 CrossRef 31. Jaiswal, P Gramene database: a hub for comparative plant genomics. In: Pereira, A eds. (2011) Plant reverse genetics. Volume 678. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp. 247-75 CrossRef 32. Gramene [http://www.gramene.org/] 33. Sol genomics network [http://solgenomics.net/] 34. Lloyd, J, Meinke, D (2012) A comprehensive dataset of genes with a loss-of-function mutant phenotype in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 158: pp. 1115-29 CrossRef 35. Hoehndorf, R, Schofield, PN, Gkoutos, GV (2011) PhenomeNET: a whole-phenome approach to disease gene discovery. Nucleic Acids Res 39: pp. e119-9 CrossRef 36. PhenomeNET [http://phenomebrowser.net] 37. Plant PhenomeNET [plant/" class="a-plus-plus">http://phenomebrowser.net/plant/] 38. Hoehndorf, R, Oellrich, A, Rebholz-Schuhmann, D (2010) Interoperability between phenotype and anatomy ontologies. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 26: pp. 3112-8 CrossRef 39. Smith, B, Ceusters, W, Klagges, B, Kohler, J, Kumar, A, Lomax, J (2005) Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biol 6: pp. R46 CrossRef 40. The OBO relations ontology [https://code.google.com/p/obo-relations/] 41. Hastings, J, Matos, P, Dekker, A, Ennis, M, Harsha, B, Kale, N (2013) The ChEBI reference database and ontology for biologically relevant chemistry: enhancements for 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 41: pp. D456-63 CrossRef 42. Link to complete dataset on iPlant Data Store. [http://ezid.cdlib.org/id/ark:/87946/p3159c] 43. The Rice Annotation Project Database [http://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/index.html] 44. Zhang, P, Foerster, H, Tissier, CP, Mueller, L, Paley, S, Karp, PD (2005) MetaCyc and AraCyc. Metabolic pathway databases for plant research. Plant Physiol 138: pp. 27-37 CrossRef 45. SolCyc biochemical pathways [http://solgenomics.net/tools/solcyc/index.pl] 46. Urbanczyk-Wochniak, E, Sumner, LW (2007) MedicCyc: a biochemical pathway database for Medicago truncatula. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 23: pp. 1418-23 CrossRef 47. Koes, RE, Quattrocchio, F, Mol, JNM (1994) The flavonoid biosynthetic pathway in plants鈥攆unction and evolution. Bioessays 16: pp. 123-32 CrossRef 48. Stapleton, AE, Walbot, V (1994) Flavonoids can protect maize DNA from the induction of ultraviolet radiation damage. Plant Physiol 105: pp. 881-9 CrossRef 49. Bruce, W, Folkerts, O, Garnaat, C, Crasta, O, Roth, B, Bowen, B (2000) Expression profiling of the maize flavonoid pathway genes controlled by estradiol-inducible transcription factors CRC and P. Plant Cell 12: pp. 65-80 CrossRef 50. Goodstein, DM, Shu, S, Howson, R, Neupane, R, Hayes, RD, Fazo, J (2012) Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 40: pp. D1178-86 CrossRef 51. Schnabel, E, Karve, A, Kassaw, T, Mukherjee, A, Zhou, X, Hall, T (2012) The M. truncatula SUNN gene is expressed in vascular tissue, similarly to RDN1, consistent with the role of these nodulation regulation genes in long distance signaling. Plant Signal Behav 7: pp. 4-6 CrossRef 52. Schnabel, E, Journet, E-P, Carvalho-Niebel, F, Duc, G, Frugoli, J (2005) The Medicago truncatula SUNN gene encodes a CLV1-like leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase that regulates nodule number and root length. Plant Mol Biol 58: pp. 809-22 CrossRef 53. Washington, NL, Haendel, MA, Mungall, CJ, Ashburner, M, Westerfield, M, Lewis, SE (2009) Linking human diseases to animal models using ontology-based phenotype annotation. PLoS Biol 7: pp. e1000247 CrossRef 54. Mabee, BP, Balhoff, JP, Dahdul, WM, Lapp, H, Midford, PE, Vision, TJ (2012) 500,000 fish phenotypes: The new informatics landscape for evolutionary and developmental biology of the vertebrate skeleton. Z Angew Ichthyol J Appl Ichthyol 28: pp. 300-5 CrossRef 55. Banks, JA, Nishiyama, T, Hasebe, M, Bowman, JL, Gribskov, M, Pamphilis, C (2011) The Selaginella genome identifies genetic changes associated with the evolution of vascular plants. Science 332: pp. 960-3 CrossRef 56. Rensing, SA, Lang, D, Zimmer, AD, Terry, A, Salamov, A, Shapiro, H (2008) The Physcomitrella genome reveals evolutionary insights into the conquest of land by plants. Science 319: pp. 64-9 CrossRef 57. Sessa, EB, Banks, JA, Barker, MS, Der, JP, Duffy, AM, Graham, SW (2014) Between two fern genomes. GigaScience 3: pp. 15 CrossRef 58. Mungall, CJ, Emmert, DB (2007) A Chado case study: an ontology-based modular schema for representing genome-associated biological information. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 23: pp. i337-46 CrossRef 59. Meinke, DW, Meinke, LK, Showalter, TC, Schissel, AM, Mueller, LA, Tzafrir, I (2003) A sequence-based map of Arabidopsis genes with mutant phenotypes. Plant Physiol 131: pp. 409-18 CrossRef 60. SeedGenes Project [http://www.seedgenes.org/] 61. Muralla, R, Lloyd, J, Meinke, D (2011) Molecular foundations of reproductive lethality in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 6: pp. e28398 CrossRef 62. The Arabidopsis Information Resource [http://www.arabidopsis.org/] 63. PubMed database [www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed] 64. Meinke, DW (2013) A survey of dominant mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Trends Plant Sci 18: pp. 84-91 plants.2012.08.006" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef 65. Oryzabase [http://www.shigen.nig.ac.jp/rice/oryzabase/] 66. Tomato Genetics Resource Center [http://tgrc.ucdavis.edu/] 67. Smedley, D, Oellrich, A, K枚hler, S, Ruef, B, Sanger Mouse Genetics, P, Westerfield, M (2013) PhenoDigm: analyzing curated annotations to associate animal models with human diseases. Database J Biol Databases Curation 2013: pp. bat025 68. The Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies foundry [ofoundry.org/" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.obofoundry.org/] 69. Smith, B, Ashburner, M, Rosse, C, Bard, J, Bug, W, Ceusters, W (2007) The OBO foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotechnol 25: pp. 1251-5 CrossRef 70. Hoehndorf, R, Dumontier, M, Oellrich, A, Wimalaratne, S, Rebholz-Schuhmann, D, Schofield, P (2011) A common layer of interoperability for biomedical ontologies based on OWL EL. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 27: pp. 1001-8 CrossRef 71. Croset, S, Overington, JP, Rebholz-Schuhmann, D (2013) Brain: biomedical knowledge manipulation. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 29: pp. 1238-9 CrossRef 72. Groovy [http://groovy-lang.org] 73. PlantCyc [plantcyc.org" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.plantcyc.org] 74. The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation- / Medicago truncatula Pathway Database [http://mediccyc.noble.org/] 75. Eddy, SR (2011) Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol 7: pp. e1002195 CrossRef 76. Stamatakis, A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 30: pp. 1312-3 CrossRef
- 刊物主题:Plant Sciences; Biological Techniques;
- 出版者:BioMed Central
- ISSN:1746-4811
文摘
Background Plant phenotype datasets include many different types of data, formats, and terms from specialized vocabularies. Because these datasets were designed for different audiences, they frequently contain language and details tailored to investigators with different research objectives and backgrounds. Although phenotype comparisons across datasets have long been possible on a small scale, comprehensive queries and analyses that span a broad set of reference species, research disciplines, and knowledge domains continue to be severely limited by the absence of a common semantic framework. Results We developed a workflow to curate and standardize existing phenotype datasets for six plant species, encompassing both model species and crop plants with established genetic resources. Our effort focused on mutant phenotypes associated with genes of known sequence in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. (Arabidopsis), Zea mays L. subsp. mays (maize), Medicago truncatula Gaertn. (barrel medic or Medicago), Oryza sativa L. (rice), Glycine max (L.) Merr. (soybean), and Solanum lycopersicum L. (tomato). We applied the same ontologies, annotation standards, formats, and best practices across all six species, thereby ensuring that the shared dataset could be used for cross-species querying and semantic similarity analyses. Curated phenotypes were first converted into a common format using taxonomically broad ontologies such as the Plant Ontology, Gene Ontology, and Phenotype and Trait Ontology. We then compared ontology-based phenotypic descriptions with an existing classification system for plant phenotypes and evaluated our semantic similarity dataset for its ability to enhance predictions of gene families, protein functions, and shared metabolic pathways that underlie informative plant phenotypes. Conclusions The use of ontologies, annotation standards, shared formats, and best practices for cross-taxon phenotype data analyses represents a novel approach to plant phenomics that enhances the utility of model genetic organisms and can be readily applied to species with fewer genetic resources and less well-characterized genomes. In addition, these tools should enhance future efforts to explore the relationships among phenotypic similarity, gene function, and sequence similarity in plants, and to make genotype-to-phenotype predictions relevant to plant biology, crop improvement, and potentially even human health.
| |
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.
| |