Performance of the L’Aquila (central Italy) gas distribution network in the 2009 ( $\mathrm

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Simona Esposito (1)
  Sonia Giovinazzi (2)
  Ludovica Elefante (1)
  Iunio Iervolino (1)
  
• 关键词：Lifelines ; Repair rate ; Pipelines ; Resilience ; Transient and permanent ground deformations
• 刊名：Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：December 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：11
• 期：6
• 页码：2447-2466
• 全文大小：
• 作者单位：Simona Esposito (1)
  Sonia Giovinazzi (2)
  Ludovica Elefante (1)
  Iunio Iervolino (1)
  
  1. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Strutturale, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
  2. Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
  
• ISSN：1573-1456

文摘

Despite the seismic vulnerability of gas systems and the significance of the direct and indirect consequences that loss functionality might have on large communities, the analysis of the earthquake performance and of post-earthquake management for this kind of distribution networks appears under-represented in the international literature, with respect to other lifeline systems. To contribute on this matter, the study presented comprises an investigation of the impact of L’Aquila 2009 earthquake ( $\text{ M }_\mathrm{w}$ 6.3) on the performance of the local medium- and low-pressure gas distribution networks. The assessment of the physical impact of the earthquake to the buried components of network, namely pipes, valves, and demand nodes, was carried out when processing post-earthquake repair activity reports. Repair data, along with geometrical and constructive features, were collected in a geographic information system linked to the digitized maps of the network, and compared with the interpolated map of recorded transient ground motion, measured in terms of peak ground velocity (i.e., a $Shakemap^\mathrm{TM}$ ). The impact of permanent ground deformation was also investigated and found to be limited in the study area. The resulting observed repair rates (number of repairs per km), presented for different pipeline materials, were compared with repair ratio fragility functions available in literature, showing relatively agreement especially to those for steel pipes, likely also because of the uncertainties in the estimations. Finally, the management of the L’Aquila gas system in the emergency phase and the resilience (functionality recover versus time) of the system was discussed.