Social Welfare Semantics for Value-Based Argumentation Framework

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Fuan Pu (20)
  Jian Luo (20)
  Yulai Zhang (20)
  Guiming Luo (20)
  
• 关键词：abstract argumentation ; value ; based argumentation ; preferences ; social welfare function ; Pareto efficiency
• 刊名：Lecture Notes in Computer Science
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：8041
• 期：1
• 页码：89-103
• 全文大小：272KB
• 参考文献：1. Bench-Capon, T., Atkinson, K.: Abstract argumentation and values. In: Simari, G., Rahwan, I. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 45-4. Springer, US (2009) CrossRef
  2. Bench-Capon, T., Dunne, P.: Value based argumentation frameworks. In: Proc. 9th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Toulouse, France, pp. 443-54 (2002)
  3. Caminada, M., Pigozzi, G.: On judgment aggregation in abstract argumentation. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems?1(22), 64-02 (2011) CrossRef
  4. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Journal of Artificial Intelligence?77(2), 321-57 (1995) CrossRef
  5. G?rtner, W.: A Primer on Social Choice Theory. Oxford University Press (2006)
  6. Hunter, A.: A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning?54(1), 47-1 (2013) CrossRef
  7. Leite, J.: a., Martins, J.a.: Social abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Barcelona, pp. 2287-292 (2011)
  8. Modgil, S., Caminada, M.: Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Simari, G., Rahwan, I. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 105-29. Springer, US (2009) CrossRef
  9. Rahwan, I., Larson, K.: Mechanism design for abstract argumentation. In: AAMAS 2008, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, pp. 1031-038 (2008)
  10. Rahwan, I., Larson, K.: Pareto optimality in abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 150-55 (2008)
  11. Rahwan, I., Tohmé, F.: Collective argument evaluation as judgement aggregation. In: AAMAS 2010, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, pp. 417-24 (2010)
  12. Shoham, Y., Leyton-Brown, K.: Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations. Cambridge University Press (2009)
  
• 作者单位：Fuan Pu (20)
  Jian Luo (20)
  Yulai Zhang (20)
  Guiming Luo (20)
  
  20. School of Software, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
  

文摘

Logically intuitive properties of argument acceptance criteria have been paid great attention in the argumentation frameworks, however, which do not take into account the agents. Recently research has begun on evaluating argument acceptance criteria considering preferences of audiences, a kind of representative agents. In this paper we take a step towards applying social choice theory into value-based argumentation framework (VAF), and propose social welfare semantics, an extension of Dung’s semantics incorporating social preference. Then the social welfare semantics and its relationship with the semantics of VAF are analyzed, and some non-trivial properties are proved based on Pareto efficiency.