Ecosystem services modeling in contrasting landscapes

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Bojie Fu (1) (2)
  Martin Forsius (3)
  
  1. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology ; Research Center for Eco-environmental Sciences (RCEES) ; Chinese Academy of Sciences ; 18 Shuangqing Road ; Haidian District ; Beijing ; 100085 ; China
  2. Joint Center for Global Change Studies ; Beijing ; 100875 ; China
  3. Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) ; Natural Environment Centre ; P.O.BOX 140 ; 00251 ; Helsinki ; Finland
  
• 关键词：Landscape ecology ; Ecosystem service assessment ; Conservation ; Trade ; off ; Adaptation ; Climes ; LTER
• 刊名：Landscape Ecology
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：March 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：30
• 期：3
• 页码：375-379
• 全文大小：138 KB
• 参考文献：1. Arvola L, Einola E, J盲rvinen M (2015) Landscape properties and precipitation as determinants for high summer nitrogen load from boreal catchments. Landscape Ecol.聽doi:10.1007/s10980-015-0166-8
  2. Burkhard, B, Crossman, N, Nedkov, S, Petz, K, Alkemade, R (2013) Mapping and modeling ecosystem services for science, policy and practice. Ecosyst Serv 4: pp. 1-3 CrossRef
  3. Crossman, ND, Burkhard, B, Nedkov, S, Willemen, L, Petz, K, Palomo, I, Drakou, EG, Mart铆n-Lopez, B, McPhearson, T, Boyanova, K (2013) A blueprint for mapping and modeling ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 4: pp. 14-44 CrossRef
  4. Dunford, RW, Smith, AC, Harrison, PA, Hanganu, D (2015) Ecosystem service provision in a changing Europe: adapting to the impacts of combined climate and socio-economic change. Landscape Ecol.
  5. Forsius, M, Anttila, S, Arvola, L, Bergstr枚m, I, Hakola, H, Heikkinen, HI, Helenius, J, Hyv盲rinen, M, Jylh盲, K, Karjalainen, J, Keskinen, T, Laine, K, Nikinmaa, E, Peltonen-Sainio, P, Rankinen, K, Reinikainen, M, Set盲l盲, H, Vuorenmaa, J (2013) Impacts and adaptation options of climate change on ecosystem services in Finland: a model based study. Curr Opin Env Sust 5: pp. 26-40 CrossRef
  6. Fu, BJ, Su, CH, Wei, YP, Willett, IR, L眉, YH, Liu, GH (2011) Double counting in ecosystem services valuation: causes and countermeasures. Ecol Res 26: pp. 1-14 CrossRef
  7. Fu, BJ, Forsius, M, Liu, J (2013) Ecosystem services: climate change and policy impacts. Curr Opin Env Sust 5: pp. 1-3 CrossRef
  8. Haines-Young, R, Potschin, M The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In: Raffaelli, D, Frid, C eds. (2010) Ecosystem Ecology: a new synthesis. BES Ecological Reviews Series, CUP, Cambridgepp. 162
  9. Holmberg, M, Akuj盲rvi, A, Anttila, S, Arvola, L, Bergstr枚m, I, B枚ttcher, K, Feng, XM, Forsius, M, Huttunen, I, Huttunen, M, Laine, Y, Lehtonen, H, Liski, J, Mononen, L, Rankinen, K, Repo, A, Sepp盲nen, V, Vanhala, P, Vihervaara, P (2015) ESLab application to a boreal watershed in southern Finland鈥攑reparing for a virtual research environment of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol.
  10. Hu, HT, Fu, BJ, L眉, YH, Zheng, ZM (2015) SAORES: a spatially explicit assessment and optimization tool for regional ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol.
  11. IEEP, Alterra, Ecologic, PBL and UNEP-WCMC (2009) Scenarios and models for exploring future trends of biodiversity and ecosystem services changes. Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment on Contract ENV.G.1/ETU/2008/0090r. Institute for European Environmental Policy, Alterra Wageningen UR, Ecologic, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre
  12. Iverson, L, Echeverria, C, Nahuelhual, L, Luque, S (2014) Ecosystem services in changing landscapes: an introduction. Landscape Ecol 29: pp. 181-186 CrossRef
  13. Liu, M, Liu, GH, Zheng, XX (2014) Spatial pattern changes of biomass, litterfall and coverage with environmental factors across temperate grassland subjected to various management practices. Landscape Ecol.
  14. Lu, N, Akuj盲rvi, A, Wu, X, Liski, J, Wen, ZM, Holmberg, M, Feng, XM, Zeng, Y, Fu, BJ (2014) Changes in soil carbon stock predicted by a process-based soil carbon model (Yasso07) in the Yanhe watershed of the Loess Plateau. Landscape Ecol.
  15. L眉, Y, Sun, FX, Wang, JL, Zeng, Y, Holmberg, M, B枚ttcher, K, Vanhala, P, Fu, BJ (2014) Managing landscape heterogeneity in different socioecological contexts: contrasting cases from central Loess Plateau of China and Southern Finland. Landscape Ecol.
  16. Mace, GM, Norris, K, Fitter, AH (2012) Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol Evol 27: pp. 19-27 CrossRef
  17. Maes J, Braat L, Jax K, Hutchins M, Furman E, Termansen M, Luque S, Paracchini ML, Chauvin C, Williams R, Volk M, Lautenbach S, Kopperoinen L, Schelhaas M-J,聽 Weinert J, Goossen M, Dumont E, Strauch M, G枚rg C, Dormann C, Katwinkel M, Zulian G, Varjopuro R, Ratam盲ki O, Hauck J, Forsius M, Hengeveld G, Perez-Soba M, Bouraoui F, Scholz M,聽 Schulz-Zunkel C, Lepist枚 A, Polishchuk Y, Bidoglio G (2011) A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe: methods, case studies and policy analysis - phase 1. PEER Report No 3. Ispra: Partnership for European Environmental Research
  18. Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M, Liquete C, Braat L, Berry P, Egoh B, Puydarrieux P, Fiorina C, Santos F, Paracchini ML, Keune H, Wittmer H, Hauck J, Fiala I, Verburg PH, Cond茅 S, Sch盲gner JP, San Miguel J, Estreguil C, Ostermann O, Barredo JI, Pereira HM, Stott A, Laporte V, Meiner A, Olah B, Royo Gelabert E, Spyropoulou R, Petersen JE, Maguire C, Zal N, Achilleos E, Rubin A, Ledoux L, Brown C, Raes C, Jacobs S, Vandewalle M, Connor D, Bidoglio G (2013) Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg
  19. Maes J, Barbosa A, Baranzelli C, Zulian G, e Silva FB, Vandecasteele I, Hiederer R, Liquete C, Paracchini ML, Mubareka S, Jacobs-Crisioni C, Castillo CP, Lavalle C (2014) More green infrastructure is required to maintain ecosystem services under current trends in landuse change in Europe. Landscape Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10980-014-0083-2
  20. Posch, M, Duan, L, Reinds, GJ, Zhao, Y (2014) Critical loads of nitrogen and sulphur to avert acidification and eutrophication in Europe and China. Landscape Ecol.
  21. Rankinen, K, Gao, GY, Granlund, K, Gr枚nroos, J, Vesikko, L (2015) Comparison of impacts of human activities and climate change on water quantity and quality in Finnish agricultural catchments. Landscape Ecol.
  22. Vihervaara, P, Mononen, L, Auvinen, AP, Virkkala, R, L眉, YH, Pippuri, I, Packalen, P, Valbuena, R, Valkama, J (2015) How to integrate remotely sensed data and biodiversity for ecosystem assessments at landscape scale. Landscape Ecol.
  23. Wu, X, Akuj盲rvi, A, Lu, N, Liski, J, Liu, GH, Wang, YF, Holmberg, M, Li, F, Zeng, Y, Fu, BJ (2015) Dynamics of soil organic carbon stock in a typical catchment of the Loess Plateau: comparison of model simulations with measurements. Landscape Ecol.
  24. Zhang, LW, Fu, BJ, L眉, YH, Zeng, Y (2015) Balancing multiple ecosystem services in conservation priority setting. Landscape Ecol.
  
• 刊物类别：Biomedical and Life Sciences
• 刊物主题：Life Sciences
  Landscape Ecology
  Plant Ecology
  Forestry Management
  Forestry
  Ecology
  Plant Sciences
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1572-9761

文摘

Landscape ecology can make a large contribution to ecosystem service (ES) studies since most ESs are place-based, and thus best evaluated, maintained, enhanced, and restored using integrative techniques at the landscape scale. Integration of field observation, modeling, and remote sensing are increasingly used to quantify and assess ES at different scales. In this special issue, several comprehensive methodologies and tools are described in the thirteen papers included. The papers are grouped into four categories: modelling and evaluation of carbon and water services of ecosystems, comprehensive analysis and assessment of multiple ESs, integrated ES methodologies for conservation, and development of integrated modeling environments for ESs. We believe that these papers provide both useful methods and tools to simulate and evaluate ESs at different spatial and temporal scales, as well as interesting results from case studies. We also hope that they can provide information for policy makers and managers regarding wiser landscape management and conservation.