Displacing Marginalized Bodies: How Human Rights Discourses Function in the Law and in Communities

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Katrina M. Powell ; Jenny Dick-Mosher…
• 关键词：Displacement ; Human rights ; Disability studies ; Americans with Disabilities Act ; Virginia ; Eugenics
• 刊名：International Journal for the Semiotics of Law
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：March 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：29
• 期：1
• 页码：67-85
• 全文大小：432 KB
• 参考文献：1.Ahmed, S. 2000. Strange encounters: Embodied others in post-coloniality. London: Routledge.
  2.Allen, K.G. 2001. Long-term care: Implications of Supreme Court’s Olmstead decision are still unfolding. In GAO testimony before the special committee on aging; U.S. Senate.
  3.Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, Stat. 327.
  4.Bagenstos. S.R. 2011. Olmstead goes to work. Remarks as Prepared for Delivery at Case Western Reserve University School of law, March 15, 2011.
  5.Baines, Erin K. 2004. Vulnerable bodies: Gender, the UN and the global refugee crisis. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
  6.Bohmer, Carol, and Amy, Shuman. (2011). Gender and political asylum. Foreign Policy Association. 13 April 2011. http://​foreignpolicyblo​gs.​com/​2011/​04/​13/​gender-political-asylum/​ .
  7.Brown-Leonardi, Carol J. 2012. Notions of property: Traditional land use and boundaries in the deh cho region. The Polar Record 48(3): 249–254.CrossRef
  8.Butler, Judith. 2008. Performativity, precarity, and sexual politics. Revista de Antropologia Iberoamericana 4(3): 1–8.
  9.Bystrom, Kerry. 2012. Literature and human rights. In Handbook of human rights, ed. Thomas Cushman, 637–646. New York: Routledge.
  10.Caley, S.B., and S.D. Caley. 2010. The olmstead decision: The road to dignity and freedom. Georgia State University Law Review 26(3): 651–662.
  11.Clare, Eli. 2001. Stolen bodies, reclaimed bodies: Disability and queerness. Public Culture 13(3): 359–365.CrossRef
  12.Currell, Susan, and Christina Cogdell (eds.). 2006. Popular eugenics: National efficiency and American mass culture in the 1930s. Athens: Ohio University Press.
  13.Coundouriotis, Eleni, and Lauren M.E. Goodlad. 2010. Introduction: Comparative human rights: literature, art, politics. Journal of Human Rights 9: 121–126.CrossRef
  14.Dorr, Gregory Michael. 2008. Segregation’s science: Eugenics and society in Virginia. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
  15.Fox, Peggy. 2013. Parents of disabled adults fighting center’s closing. In WUSA9.com. July 25, 2013.
  16.Goffman, E. 1961. On the characteristics of total institutions. In Symposium on preventive and social psychiatry (pp. 43–84).
  17.Golder, Ben. 2013. Foucault, rights and freedom. International Journal for the Semiotics of the Law 26: 5–21.CrossRef
  18.Guggenheim, Martin. 2006. Ratify the U.N. convention on the rights of the child, but don’t expect any miracles. 20 Emory International Law Review 43: 3–68.
  19.Harrington, Charlene, Terence Ng, Mitchell LaPlante, and Stephen Kaye. 2012. Medicaid home-and community-based services: Impact of the affordable care act. Journal of Aging & Social Policy 24(2): 169–187.CrossRef
  20.Hesford, Wendy. 2012. Spectacular rhetorics. Durham: Duke University Press.
  21.Hunt, Lynn. 2008. Inventing human rights: A history. New York: W.W. Norton Company.
  22.Holstein, M.B., and P. Mitzen (eds.). 2001. Ethics in community-based elder care. New York: Springer.
  23.Irvin, C.V., D. Lipson, S. Simon, et al. 2012. Money follows the person 2011 annual evaluation report. Final Report Submitted to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Division of Community Services.
  24.Lombardo, Paul. 2008. Three generations, no imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  25.Lyon, Arabella. 2013. Deliberative acts: Democracy, rhetoric, rights. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  26.Lyon, Arabella, and Lester Olson (eds.). 2012. Human rights rhetorics. New York: Routledge.
  27.McBryde Johnson, H., and B. East. 2000. Tearing down the walls: The fight against state created segregation. Guild Notes 24(2): 19–20.
  28.McBryde Johnson, H. 2003. The disability gulag. New York Times. November 23, 2003. p. 53.
  29.Matua, Makau. 2001. Savages, victims, and saviors: The metaphor of human rights. Harvard International Law Journal 42(1): 201–245.
  30.McRuer, Robert. 2006. Crip Theory. New York: New York University Press.
  31.Mitchell, D., and D. Braddock. 1990. Historical and contemporary issues in nursing home reform. Mental retardation 28(4): 201–210.
  32.Mooney, Annabelle. 2002. Human rights, linguistics and the law: The UK and beyond. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 15: 389–398.CrossRef
  33.National Council on Disability. 2014. NCD statement on the 15th anniversary of the Olmstead decision. http://​www.​ncd.​gov/​NCD/​newsroom/​06232014 . Retrieved June 24, 2014.
  34.Nielson, K. 2012. A disability history of the United States. Boston: Beacon Press.
  35.Perez, Oren, and Gunther Teubner. 2006. Paradoxes and inconsistencies in the law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  36.Powell, Katrina M. 2015. Identity and power in narratives of displacement. New York: Routledge.
  37.Puar, Jasbir, ed. 2012. Precarity talk: A virtual roundtable with Lauren Berlant, Judith Butler, Bojana Cvejic, Isabell Lorey, Jasbir Puar, and Ana Vujanavic. Drama Review, 56.4, 163–177.
  38.Reed, Ray. 2011a. Justice Department report blasts central Virginia Training Center. In WSLS10.com. February 11, 2011.
  39.Reed, Ray. 2011b. CVTC report echoes across Virginia. In WSLS10.com. February 14, 2011.
  40.Rich, Adrienne. 1994. Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. In Blood, Bread, and Poetry. New York: Norton Paperback.
  41.Saunders, Tim. 2013. Families continue fight to keep training centers for disabled: Families of severely disabled people say that loved ones are being forced out of state institutions known as training centers. In WDBJ.com. July 15 2013.
  42.Schaffer, Kay, and Sidonie Smith. 2001. Human rights and narrated lives. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
  43.Scheerenberger, R.C. 1983. A history of mental retardation. Baltimore: Brooks Publishing.
  44.Sciarrillo, Rosemary v. Christopher Christie and the State of New Jersey. CIV. NO.: 2:13-cv-03478 http://​www.​ada.​gov/​olmstead/​documents/​sciarrillo-christie-soi.​pdf .
  45.Slaughter, Joseph. 2007. Human Rights Inc.: The world novel, narrative form, and international law. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRef
  46.Stefan, S. 2010. Beyond residential segregation: The application of the Olmstead decision to segregated employment settings. Georgia State University Law Review 26(3): 875–919.
  47.Swales, John. 1990. The concept of discourse community. In Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings (pp. 21–32). Boston: Cambridge University Press.
  48.Trent, James W. 2006. Intellectual disabilities in the USA: From the institution to the community, 1948–2001. In Community care in perspective: Care, control and citizenship, ed. John Welshman, and Jan Walmsley, 109–121. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  49.Trent, James W. 1994. Inventing the feeble mind: A history of mental retardation in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  50.Transformation, Disabled and Elderly Health programs Group. Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research, October 31, 2012.
  51.Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services. 2013. My new home in the community: An information handbook for families preparing to transition from institutions to new homes in the community. http://​www.​dbhds.​virginia.​gov/​documents/​ODS/​My%20​New%20​Home%20​in%20​the%0Community.​pdf .
  52.Welshman, John, and Jan Walmsley (eds.). 2006. Community care in perspective: Care, control and citizenship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  53.Wright, Shelly. 2001. International human rights, decolonization and globalization: Becoming human. New York: Routledge.
  
• 作者单位：Katrina M. Powell (1)
  Jenny Dick-Mosher (1)
  Anisa Zvonkovic (1)
  Pamela B. Teaster (1)
  
  1. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
  
• 刊物类别：Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
• 刊物主题：Law
  Law Theory and Philosophy
  Applied Linguistics
  Sociolinguistics
  Philosophy of Law
  Logic
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1572-8722

文摘

In this article, we examine disability and eugenics discourses and the ways they function in spaces where vulnerable persons have been historically excluded by the state and blamed for their own “immiseration.” We ask how queer theories of repudiation, abjection, and vulnerability lend insight into the ways that people with intellectual disabilities are discursively located outside normative discourses of home, care, and quality of life, and whether these discourses shifted to serve this vulnerable population when historically the very places in question repudiated them, infringed on their human rights, and questioned their sexuality. To address these questions, we focus on the recent and impending closures of Virginia’s Training Centers, residential institutions for persons with intellectual disabilities now scheduled for staggered closures before 2020.