Effects of ten naturally occurring sugars on the reproductive success of the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Darinka Gonzalez ; Anabela Nave ; Fátima Gonçalves ; Fernando M. Nunes…
  • 关键词:Conservation biological control ; Floral nectar ; Coccid honeydew ; Habitat manipulation ; Life table ; Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera ; Chrysopidae)
  • 刊名:BioControl
  • 出版年:2016
  • 出版时间:February 2016
  • 年:2016
  • 卷:61
  • 期:1
  • 页码:57-67
  • 全文大小:704 KB
  • 参考文献:Baker HG, Baker I (1982) Chemical constituents of nectar in relation to pollination mechanism and phylogeny. In: Nitecki MH (ed) Biochemical aspects of evolutionary biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 131–171
    Baker HG, Baker I (1983) Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 117–141
    Ben Saad AA, Bishop GW (1976) Effect of artificial honeydews on insect communities in potato fields. Environ Entomol 5:453–457CrossRef
    Birch LC (1948) The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J Anim Ecol 17:15–26CrossRef
    Bogo A, Mantle P (2000) Oligosaccharides in the honeydew of Coccoidea scale insects: Coccus hesperidum L. and a new Stigmacoccus sp. in Brazil. An Soc Entomol Bras 29:589–595CrossRef
    Bond AB (1980) Optimal foraging in a uniform habitat: the search mechanism of the green lacewing. Anim Behav 28:10–19CrossRef
    Carey JR (1993) Applied demography for biologist: with special emphasis on insects. Oxford University Press, New York
    Duelli P (2001) Lacewings in field crops. In: McEwen P, New TR, Whittington AE (eds) Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 158–171CrossRef
    Eilenberg J, Hajek A, Lomer C (2001) Suggestions for unifying the terminology in biological control. BioControl 46:387–400CrossRef
    Fischer MK, Shingleton AW (2001) Host plant and ants influence the honeydew sugar composition of aphids. Funct Ecol 15:544–550CrossRef
    Gotelli NJ (1998) A primer of ecology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
    Gurr GM, Scarratt SL, Wratten SD, Berndt L, Irvin N (2004) Ecological engineering, habitat manipulation and pest management. In: Gurr GM, Wratten SD, Altieri MA (eds) Ecological engineering for pest management: advances in habitat manipulation for arthropods. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, pp 1–12
    Hagen KS (1986) Ecosystem analysis: plant cultivars (HPR), entomophagous species and food supplements. In: Boethel DJ, Eikenbary RD (eds) Interactions of plant resistance and parasitoids and predators of insects. Ellis Horwood Ltd, Chichester, pp 151–197
    Hagen KS, Greany P, Sawall EF, Tassan RL (1976) Tryptophan in artificial honeydew as a source of an attractant for adult Chrysoperla carnea. Environ Entomol 5:458–468CrossRef
    Harvey JA, Cloutier J, Visser B, Ellers J, Wäckers FL, Gols R (2012) The effect of different dietary sugars and honey on longevity and fecundity in two hyperparasitoid wasps. J Insect Physiol 58:816–823PubMed CrossRef
    Henry CS, Brooks SJ, Thierry D, Duelli P, Johnson JB (2001) The common green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea s.lat.) and the sibling species problem. In: McEwen PK, New TR, Whittington AE (eds) Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 29–42CrossRef
    Hogervorst PAM, Wäckers FL, Romeis J (2007) Detecting nutritional state and food source use in field-collected insects that synthesize honeydew oligosaccharides. Funct Ecol 21:936–946CrossRef
    Karley AJ, Ashford DA, Minto LM, Pritchard J, Douglas AE (2005) The significance of gut sucrose activity for osmoregulation in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. J Insect Physiol 51:1313–1319PubMed CrossRef
    Katsoyannos P (1993) Olive pests and their control in the Near East. Bernan Assoc, Lanham
    Kennedy JS, van Impe G, Hence T, Lebrum P (1996) Demecology of the false spider mite, Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijskes) (Acari, Tenuipalpidae). J Appl Ent 120:493–499CrossRef
    Khuhro NH, Chen HY, Zhang Y, Zhang LS, Wang MQ (2012) Effect of different prey species on the life history parameters of Chrysoperla sinica (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Eur J Entomol 109:175–180CrossRef
    Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Ann Rev Entomol 45:175–201CrossRef
    Lauprasert P, Sitthicharoenchai D, Thirakhupt K, Pradatsudarasar A-O (2006) Food preference and feeding behavior of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (Linnaeus). J Sci Res Chula Univ 31:121–126
    Li Y, Meissle M, Romeis J (2008) Consumption of Bt maize pollen expressing Cry1Ab or Cry3Bb1 does not harm adult green lacewings, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). PLoS ONE 3:e2909PubMed PubMedCentral CrossRef
    Li Y, Michael M, Romeis J (2010) Use of maize pollen by adult Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and fate of Cry proteins in Bt—transgenic varieties. J Insect Physiol 56:157–164PubMed CrossRef
    Lundgren JG (2009) Relationships of natural enemies and non-prey foods. Springer, New York
    McEwen PK, Kidd NAC (1995) The effects of different components of an artificial food on adult green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea) fecundity and longevity. Entomol Exp Appl 77:343–346CrossRef
    McEwen PK, Jervis MA, Kidd NAC (1993) Influence of artificial honeydew on larval development and survival in Chrysoperla carnea (Neur., Chrysopidae). Entomophaga 38:241–244CrossRef
    Meissle M, Álvarez-Alfageme F, Malone LA, Romeis J (2012) Establishing a database of bio-ecological information on non-target arthropod species to support the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops in the EU. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma
    Pappas ML, Broufas GD, Koveos DS (2011) Chrysopid predators and their role in biological control. J Entomol 8:301–326CrossRef
    Pekas A, Tena A, Aguilar A, Garcia-Mari F (2011) Spatio-temporal patterns and interactions with honeydew-producing Hemiptera of ants in a Mediterranean citrus orchard. Agric For Entomol 13(1):89–97CrossRef
    Percival MS (1961) Types of nectar in angiosperms. New Phytol 60:235–281CrossRef
    Petanidou T (2005) Sugars in Mediterranean floral nectars: an ecological and evolutionary approach. J Chem Ecol 31:1065–1088PubMed CrossRef
    Petanidou T (2007) Ecological and evolutionary aspects of floral nectars in Mediterranean habitats. In: Nicolson S, Nepi M, Pacini E (eds) Nectaries and nectar. Springer, New York, pp 343–375CrossRef
    Petanidou T, Ellis WN (1993) Pollinating fauna of a phryganic ecosystem: composition and diversity. Biodivers Lett 1:9–22CrossRef
    Porcel M (2012) Bioecological study of the Chrysopidae family (Insecta: Neuroptera) in olive orchards from a population growth and conservation perspective. Universidad de Granada, Granada
    Porcel M, Cotes B, Campos M (2011) Biological and behavioral effects of kaolin particle film on larvae and adults of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Biol Control 59:98–105CrossRef
    Porcel M, Ruano F, Cotes B, Peña A, Campos M (2013) Agricultural management systems affect the Green Lacewing Community (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ Entomol 42:97–106PubMed CrossRef
    Price PW (1997) Insect ecology. Wiley, New York
    Principi MM, Canard M (1984) Feeding habits. In: Canard M, Séméria Y, New TR (eds) Biology of chrysopidae. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 76–92
    Romeis J, Meissle M, Naranjo SE, Li Y, Bigler F (2014) The end of a myth—Bt (Cry1Ab) maize does not harm green lacewings. Front Plant Sci 5:1–10CrossRef
    Sarailoo MH, Lakzaei M (2014) Effect of different diets on some biological parameters of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J Crop Prot 3:479–486
    Schuster MF, Calderon M (1986) Interactions of host plant resistant genotypes and beneficial insects in cotton ecosystems. In: Boethel DJ, Eikenbary RD (eds) Interactions of plant resistance and parasitoids and predators of insects. Halsted Press, New York, pp 84–97
    Senior LJ, McEwen PK (2001) The use of lacewings in biological control. In: McEwen PK, New TR, Whittington AE (eds) Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 296–302CrossRef
    Sheldon JK, MacLeod EG (1971) Studies on the biology of Chrysopidae. II. The feeding behavior of the adult Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera). Psyche 78:107–121
    Speight MR, Hunter MD, Watt AD (2008) Ecology of insects: concepts and applications. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken
    Sunby RA (1966) A comparative study of the efficiency of three predatory insects Coccinella septempunctata L. [Coleoptera, Coccinellidae], Chrysopa carnea St. [Neuroptera, Chrysopidae] and Syrphus Ribesii L. [Diptera,; Syrphidae] at two different temperatures. Entomophaga 11:395–404CrossRef
    Tassan RL, Hagen KS, Sawall EFJ (1979) The influence of field food sprays on the egg production rate of Chrysopa carnea. Environ Entomol 8:81–85CrossRef
    Tauber MJ, Tauber CA, Daane KM, Hagen KS (2000) Commercialization of predators: recent lessons from green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Am Entomol 46:26–38CrossRef
    van Rijn PCJ (2012) The suitability of field margin flowers as food source for Chrysoperla lacewings. IOBC/WPRS Bull 75:213–216
    Villenave J, Deutsch B, Lodé T, Rat-Morris E (2006) Pollen preference of the Chrysoperla species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) occurring in the crop environment in western France. Eur J Entomol 103:771–777CrossRef
    Wäckers FL (2001) A comparison of nectar- and honeydew sugars with respect to their utilization by the hymenopteran parasitoid Cotesia glomerata. J Insect Physiol 47:1077–1084PubMed CrossRef
    Wäckers FL (2005) Suitability of (extra-) floral nectar, pollen and honeydew as insect food sources. In: Wäckers FL, van Rijn PCJ, Bruin J (eds) Plant-provided food for carnivorous insects: a protective mutualism and its application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 17–74CrossRef
    Wäckers FL, van Rijn PCJ (2012) Pick and mix: selecting flowering plants to meet the requirements of target biological control insects. In: Gurr GM, Wratten SD, Snyder WE, Read DMY (eds) Biodiversity and insect pests: key issues for sustainable management. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 139–165CrossRef
    Wool D, Hendrix D, Shukry O (2006) Seasonal variation in honeydew sugar content of galling aphids (Aphidoidea: Pemphigidae: Fordinae) feeding on Pistacia: Host ecology and aphid physiology. Basic Appl Ecol 7:141–151CrossRef
  • 作者单位:Darinka Gonzalez (1)
    Anabela Nave (1)
    Fátima Gonçalves (1)
    Fernando M. Nunes (2)
    Mercedes Campos (3)
    Laura Torres (1)

    1. Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, CITAB, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, UTAD, Quinta de Prados, 5001-801, Vila Real, Portugal
    2. CQVR, Chemistry Research Centre, Chemistry Department, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5001-801, Vila Real, Portugal
    3. Department of Environmental Protection, Estación Experimental de Zaidín, CSIC Profesor Albareda nº1, 18008, Granada, Spain
  • 刊物类别:Biomedical and Life Sciences
  • 刊物主题:Life Sciences
    Evolutionary Biology
    Plant Pathology
    Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/ Biogeography
    Plant Sciences
  • 出版者:Springer Netherlands
  • ISSN:1573-8248
文摘
The longevity and reproduction of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) when fed on ten naturally occurring sugars and on an artificial diet composed by honey and pollen (1:1) were evaluated. The effect of these diets differed between sexes. However insects of both sexes lived longer when fed on fructose than on sucrose, melezitose or raffinose. None of the females oviposited when offered raffinose, galactose or mannose. Moreover, lifetime fecundity of females fed on trehalose was not different from the artificial diet. The intrinsic rate of natural increase did not differ between trehalose, maltose, melibiose, fructose, glucose and artificial diet, being significantly lower for individuals fed on melezitose and sucrose. The importance of these results for the selection of natural sugar sources that enhance C. carnea effectiveness as a biological control agent against crop pests is discussed. Keywords Conservation biological control Floral nectar Coccid honeydew Habitat manipulation Life table Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.