Quantitative risk assessment of slope hazards along a section of railway in the Canadian Cordillera—a methodology considering the uncertainty in the results

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Renato Macciotta ; C. Derek Martin ; Norbert R. Morgenstern ; David M. Cruden
• 关键词：Rock falls ; Uncertainty ; Quantitative risk assessment ; Monte Carlo simulation
• 刊名：Landslides
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：February 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：13
• 期：1
• 页码：115-127
• 全文大小：1,590 KB
• 参考文献：Australian Geomechanics Society (AGS) (2007) Practice note guidelines for landslide risk management 2007. Aust Geomech 42(1):63–114
  Australian National Committee on Large Dams (ANCOLD) (2003) Guidelines on risk assessment. Australian National Committee on Large Dams Inc, Melbourne
  Ayyub BM (2003) Risk Analysis in Engineering and Economics. CRC Press
  Baecher GB, Christian JT (2003) Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. Wiley, West Sussex, p 605
  Barney D, Haley D, Nikandros G (2001) Calculating train braking distance. Proceedings of the 6th Australian workshop on Safety Critical Systems and Software, Brisbane, Australia. AustComp Soc 3:23–29
  Brawner CO (1978) Case examples of rock stability on rail projects. American Railway Engineering Association-Bulletin 668, Proceedings 77th technical conference. Chicago 79:348–364
  Brawner CO, Wyllie DC (1975) Rock slope stability on railway projects. American Railway Engineering Association-Bulletin 656, Proceedings 75th technical conference. Chicago 77:449–484
  Budetta P (2004) Assessment of rockfall risk along roads. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4:71–81CrossRef
  Bunce CM (2008) Risk estimation for railways exposed to landslides. Dissertation, University of Alberta
  Bunce CM, Cruden DM, Morgenstern NR (1997) Assessment of the hazard from rock fall on a highway. Can Geotech J 34:344–356CrossRef
  Crozier MJ, Glade T (2005) Landslide hazard and risk: issues, concepts and approach, landslide hazard and risk. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–40
  Dorren LKA (2003) A review of rockfall mechanics and modelling approaches. Prog Phys Geogr 27(1):69–87CrossRef
  EI-Ramly H, Morgenstern NR, Cruden DM (2002) Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice. Can Geotech J 39(3):665–683CrossRef
  ERM-Hong Kong Ltd. (1998) Landslides and boulder falls from natural terrain: interim risk guidelines, The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, pp 183
  Evans SG, Hungr O (1993) The assessment of rockfall hazard at the base of talus slopes. Can Geotech J 30:620–636CrossRef
  Fell R, Ho KKS, Lacasse S, Leroi E (2005) A framework for landslide risk assessment and management. In: Hungr F, Couture E (eds) Landslide risk management. Proceedings of the international conference on landslide risk management, A.A. Balkema, Vancouver, pp 3–25
  Finlay PJ, Fell R (1997) Landslides: risk perception and acceptance. Can Geotech J 34:169–188CrossRef
  Gardner J (1970) Rockfall: a geomorphic process in high mountain terrain. Albertan Geographer 6:15–20
  Gardner J (1977) High magnitude rockfall-rockslide: frequency and geomorphic significance in the Highwood Pass area, Alberta. Great Plains – Rocky Mountain Geograph J 6(2):228–238
  Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Ghigi S (2004) Rockfall hazard and risk assessment along a transportation corridor in the Nera Valley, Central Italy. Environ Manag 34(2):191–208CrossRef
  Health and Safety Executive (HSE) (2001) Reducing risks, protecting people. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London
  Ho KKS, Leroi E, Roberds WJ (2000) Quantitative risk assessment application, myths and future direction. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical and Geological Engineering (GeoEng2000), Melbourne, pp 269–312
  Hungr O, Evans SG (1989) Engineering aspects of rock-fall hazards in Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa
  Lan H, Martin CD, Lim CH (2007) Rock fall analyst: a GIS extension for three-dimensional and spatially distributed rock fall hazard modeling. Comput Geosci 33:262–279CrossRef
  Lan H, Martin CD, Zhou C, Lim CH (2010) Rockfall hazard analysis using LiDAR and spatial modeling. Geomorphology 118:213–223CrossRef
  Lee EM, Jones DKC (2004) Landslide risk assessment. Thomas Telford, London, p 454CrossRef
  Loumiet JR, Jungbauer WG (2005) Train accident reconstruction and FELA and railroad litigation. Lawyers and Judges Publishing Company, Tucson, p 576
  Macciotta R, Cruden DM, Martin CD, Morgenstern NR (2011) Combining geology, morphology and 3D modelling to understand the rock fall distribution along the railways in the Fraser River Valley, between Hope and Boston Bar, B.C. International Symposium on Rock Slope Stability in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  Macciotta R, Martin CD, Cruden DM (2014) Probabilistic estimation of rockfall height and kinetic energy based on a three-dimensional trajectory model and Monte Carlo simulation. Landslides. doi:10.​1007/​s10346-014-0503-z
  Mackay CH (1997) Management of rock slopes on the Canadian Pacific Railway. In: Cruden F (ed) Landslide risk assessment. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Landslide Risk Assessment, Hawaii, pp 271–275
  McTaggart KC, Thompson RM (1967) Geology of part of the Northern Cascades in Southern British Columbia. Can J Earth Sci 4:1199–1228CrossRef
  Monger JWH (1970) Hope map-area, west half—British Columbia, Paper 69–47. Geological Survey of Canada, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources
  Morgenstern NR (1995) Managing risk in geotechnical engineering, The 3rd Casagrande Lecture. Proceedings 10th Pan-American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Guadalajara, Mexico, 4:102–126
  Peckover FL, Kerr JWG (1977) Treatment and maintenance of rock slopes on transportation routes. Can Geotech J 14(4):487–507CrossRef
  Pierson LA (1992) Rockfall hazard rating system. Transport Res Record No 1343:6–13
  Pine RJ, Roberds WJ (2005) A risk-based approach for the design of rock slopes subject to multiple failure modes—illustrated by a case study in Hong Kong. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42:261–275CrossRef
  Piteau DR (1977) Regional slope stability controls and related engineering geology of the Fraser Canyon, British Columbia. Landslides - Rev Eng Geol GSA 3:85–111CrossRef
  Porter M, Jakob M, Holm K (2009) Proposed landslide risk tolerance criteria. 62nd Canadian Geotechnical Conference and 10th Joint CGS/IAH-CNC Groundwater Conference, Halifax, pp 533–541
  Shamekhi SE, Tannant DD (2010) Risk assessment of a road cut above Highway #1 near Chase, BC. Proceedings of the 63rd Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Calgary, pp 94–101
  Spang RM, Rautenstrauch RW (1988) Empirical and mathematical approaches to rockfall protection and their practical applications. In: Bonnard (ed) Landslides: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Landslides, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1237–1243
  Statistics Canada (2010) Mortality, Summary List of Causes 2007. Catalogue no. 84F0209X, Electronic file from www.​statcan.​gc.​ca extracted June 11, 2012
  Vick SG (2002) Degrees of Belief: Subjective Probability and Engineering Judgment. American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE Publications, pp 455
  Wang X, Frattini P, Crosta GB, Zhang L, Agliardi F, Lari S, Yang Z (2013) Uncertainty assessment in quantitative rockfall risk assessment. Landslides. doi:10.​1007/​s10346-013-0447-8
  Whalley WB (1984) Rockfalls. Brunsden, Prior (ed) Slope Instability, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 217–256
  Wyllie DC, McCammon NR, Brumund W (1980) Planning slope stabilization programs by using decision analysis. Transportation Research Record 749, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA, pp 34–39
  You X, Tonon F (2012) Event-tree analysis with imprecise probabilities. Risk Anal 32(2):330–344CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Renato Macciotta (1)
  C. Derek Martin (2)
  Norbert R. Morgenstern (3)
  David M. Cruden (4)
  
  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, 3-017 Markin/CNRL Natural Resources Engineering Facility, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2W2, Canada
  2. Canadian Rail Research Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, 3-071 Markin/CNRL Natural Resources Engineering Facility, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2W2, Canada
  3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, 3-075 Markin/CNRL Natural Resources Engineering Facility, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2W2, Canada
  4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, 3-064 Markin/CNRL Natural Resources Engineering Facility, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2W2, Canada
  
• 刊物类别：Earth and Environmental Science
• 刊物主题：Earth sciences
  Applied Geosciences
  Geography
  Agriculture
  Civil Engineering
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin Heidelberg
• ISSN：1612-5118

文摘

Railway alignments through the Canadian Cordillera are constantly exposed to slope instabilities. Proactive mitigation strategies have been in place for a few decades now, and instability record keeping has been recognized as an important aspect of them. Such a proactive strategy has enhanced the industry’s capacity to manage slope risks, and some sections have been recognized as critical due to the frequency of instabilities. At these locations, quantification of the risks becomes necessary. Risk analysis requires knowledge of some variables for which statistical data are scarce or not available, and elicitation of subjective probabilities is needed. A limitation of such approaches lies in the uncertainty associated to those elicited probabilities. In this paper, a quantitative risk analysis is presented for a section of railway across the Canadian Cordillera. The analysis focused on the risk to life of the freight train crews working along this section. Upper and lower bounds were elicited to cope with the uncertainties associated with this approach. A Monte Carlo simulation technique was then applied to obtain the probability distribution of the estimated risks. The risk probability distribution suggests that the risk to life of the crews is below previously published evaluation criteria and within acceptable levels. The risk assessment approach proposed focuses on providing a measure of the uncertainty associated with the estimated risk and is capable of handling distributions that cover more than two orders of magnitude. Keywords Rock falls Uncertainty Quantitative risk assessment Monte Carlo simulation