No imagination effect on boundary extension

设为首页

收藏本站

网站地图 | English | 公务邮箱

About the library

Background
History
Leadership
Organization

Readers' Guide

Opening Hours
Collections
Help Via Email

Publications

Electronic Information Resources

No imagination effect on boundary extension

详细信息查看全文

作者：Margaret P. Munger ; Kristi S. Multhaup
关键词：Boundary extension ; Source memory ; Spatial imagery
刊名：Memory & Cognition
出版年：2016
出版时间：January 2016
年：2016
卷：44
期：1
页码：73-88
全文大小：2,556 KB
参考文献：Abrams, R. A., Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Knapp, W., & Paull, D. (2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107, 1035–1047. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.006 CrossRef PubMed
Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M., & Motes, M. A. (2006). Object-spatial imagery: A new self-report imagery questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 239–263. doi:10.1002/acp.1182 CrossRef
Davoli, C. C., & Abrams, R. A. (2009). Reaching out with the imagination. Psychological Science, 20, 293–295. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02293.x CrossRef PubMed
Davoli, C. C., Brockmole, J. R., Du, F., & Abrams, R. A. (2012a). Switching between global and local scopes of attention is resisted near the hands. Visual Cognition, 20, 659–668. doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.683049 CrossRef
Davoli, C. C., Brockmole, J. R., & Goujon, A. (2012b). A bias to detail: How hand position modulates visual learning and visual memory. Memory & Cognition, 40, 352–359. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0147-3 CrossRef
Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Montana, J., Garverick, S., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). When meaning matters, look but don’t touch: The effects of posture on reading. Memory & Cognition, 38, 555–562. doi:10.3758/MC.38.5.555 CrossRef
Dickinson, C. A., & Intraub, H. (2008). Transsaccadic representation of layout: What is the time course of boundary extension? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 543–555. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.543 PubMedCentral PubMed
Finke, R. A., Johnson, M. K., & Shyi, G. C.-W. (1988). Memory confusions for real and imagined completions of symmetrical visual patterns. Memory & Cognition, 16, 133–137. doi:10.3758/BF03213481 CrossRef
Foley, M. A. (2012). Imagery encoding and false recognition errors: Exploring boundary conditions of imagery’s enhancing effects. Memory, 20, 700–716. doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.697172 CrossRef PubMed
Foley, M. A., Foy, J., Schlemmer, E., & Belser-Ehrlich, J. (2010). Imagery encoding and false recognition errors: Examining the role of imagery process and imagery content on source misattributions. Memory, 18, 801–821. doi:10.1080/09658211.2010.509731 CrossRef PubMed
Gagnier, K. M., & Intraub, H. (2012). When less is more: Line drawings lead to greater boundary extension than do colour photographs. Visual Cognition, 20, 815–824. doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.703705 PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
Greene, M. R., & Oliva, A. (2009a). The briefest of glances: The time course of natural scene understanding. Psychological Science, 20, 464–472. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02316.x PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
Greene, M. R., & Oliva, A. (2009b). Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 137–176. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.06.001 PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
Hale, R. G., Brown, J. M., McDunn, B. A., & Siddiqui, A. P. (2015). An influence of extremal edges on boundary extension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 961–966. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0751-x
Hubbard, T. L., Hutchison, J. L., & Courtney, J. R. (2010). Boundary extension: Findings and theories. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1467–1494. doi:10.1080/17470210903511236 CrossRef PubMed
Intraub, H. (2004). Anticipatory spatial representation of 3D regions explored by sighted observers and a deaf-and-blind-observer. Cognition, 94, 19–37. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.013 CrossRef PubMed
Intraub, H. (2010). Rethinking scene perception: A multisource model. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 231–264). Burlington: Academic Press.CrossRef
Intraub, H. (2012). Rethinking visual scene perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3, 117–127. doi:10.1002/wcs.149 PubMed
Intraub, H., Daniels, K. K., Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2008). Looking at scenes while searching for numbers: Dividing attention multiplies space. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1337–1349. doi:10.3758/PP.70.7.1337 CrossRef
Intraub, H., & Dickinson, C. (2008). False memory 1/20th of a second later: What the early onset of boundary extension reveals about perception. Psychological Science, 19, 1007–1014. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02192.x PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
Intraub, H., Gottesman, C. V., & Bills, A. J. (1998). Effects of perceiving and imagining scenes on memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 186–201. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.186 PubMed
Intraub, H., & Richardson, M. (1989). Wide-angle memories of close-up scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 179–187. doi:10.1037/0278- 7393.15.2.179 PubMed
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3 CrossRef PubMed
Kim, S., Dede, A. O., Hopkins, R. O., & Squire, L. R. (2015). Memory, scene construction, and the human hippocampus. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 112, 4767–4772. doi:10.1073/pnas.1503863112 CrossRef
Lindsay, D. S. (2008). Source monitoring. In J. H. Byrne & H. L. III Roediger (Eds.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference. Vol. 2: Cognitive psychology of memory (pp. 325–347). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-012370509-9.00175-3 CrossRef
Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 17–24. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x CrossRef PubMed
Markham, R., & Hynes, L. (1993). The effect of vividness of imagery on reality monitoring. Journal of Mental Imagery, 17, 159–170.
McAvinue, L. P., & Robertson, I. H. (2007). Measuring visual imagery ability: A review. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 26, 191–211. doi:10.2190/3515-8169-24J8-7157 CrossRef
McDunn, B. A., Siddiqui, A. P., & Brown, J. M. (2014). Seeking the boundary of boundary extension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 370–375. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0494-0 CrossRef
Mullally, S. L., Intraub, H., & Maguire, E. A. (2012). Attenuated boundary extension produces a paradoxical memory advantage in amnesic patients. Current Biology, 22, 261–268. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.001 PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
Multhaup, K. S. (1995). Aging, source, and decision criteria: When false fame errors do and do not occur. Psychology and Aging, 10, 492–497. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.10.3.492 CrossRef PubMed
Multhaup, K. S., & Conner, C. A. (2002). The effects of considering nonlist sources on the Deese–Roediger–McDermott memory illusion. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 214–228. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00007-4 CrossRef
Thomas, A. K., Bulevich, J. B., & Loftus, E. F. (2003). Exploring the role of repetition and sensory elaboration in the imagination inflation effect. Memory & Cognition, 31, 630–640. doi:10.3758/BF03196103 CrossRef
作者单位：Margaret P. Munger (1)
Kristi S. Multhaup (1)

1. Department of Psychology, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, 28035, USA
刊物主题：Cognitive Psychology;
出版者：Springer US
ISSN：1532-5946

文摘

Boundary extension (BE) occurs when people falsely remember perceiving beyond the edges of a presented scene. Theorists argue that BE occurs because people mistakenly attribute information they have generated to the study stimulus—that is, they make a source memory error. Inspired by this idea, in six experiments we tested whether scene details resulting from explicit imagination would be misremembered as actual visual perceptions, resulting in increased BE as compared with standard instructions. In four experiments, undergraduates completed a BE task with separate study and test blocks; in two further experiments, undergraduates completed a trial-by-trial BE task (N = 290). Half of the participants elaborated on the study pictures (imagined smells and sounds, or what was to the left and right of the scene, or what a photographer would see by zooming in or out). Robust BE was found in all experiments, but none of the elaborations modified the size of BE; therefore, BE is not to be affected by explicit elaboration and may be related to spatial rather than visual imagery ability.