| |
Water supply and sustainability: life cycle assessment of water collection, treatment and distribution service
- 作者:Adriana Del Borghi (1)
Carlo Strazza (1) Michela Gallo (1) Simona Messineo (2) Massimiliano Naso (3)
- 关键词:Desalination ; Life cycle assessment ; Potable water ; Water ; Water supply ; Waterworks
- 刊名:The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- 出版年:2013
- 出版时间:June 2013
- 年:2013
- 卷:18
- 期:5
- 页码:1158-1168
- 全文大小:379KB
- 参考文献:1. Alberti M, Marzluff J (2004) Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosyst 7:241-65 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6">CrossRef
2. Barrios R, Siebel M, van der Helm A, Bosklopper K, Gijzen H (2008) Environmental and financial life cycle impact assessment of drinking water production at Waternet. J Cleane Prod 16:471-76 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.052">CrossRef 3. Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof JP (eds) (2008) Climate change and water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Secretariat, Geneva, p. 210 4. Berger M, Finkbeiner M (2010) Water footprinting: how to address water use in life cycle assessment? Sustainability 2:919-44 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su2040919">CrossRef 5. Brugmann J (1997) Sustainability indicators revisited: getting from political objectives to performance outcomes—a response to Graham Pinfield. Local Environ 2:299-02 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13549839708725534">CrossRef 6. Cipollina A, Micale G, Rizzuti L (2005) A critical assessment of desalination operations in Sicily. Desalination 182:1-2 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.004">CrossRef 7. Das TK (2002) Evaluating the life cycle environmental performance of chlorine disinfection and ultraviolet technologies. Clean Techn Environ Pol 4(1):32-3 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10098-002-0139-x">CrossRef 8. Del Borghi A, Gaggero PL, Gallo M, Strazza C (2008) Development of PCR for WWTP based on a case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(6):512-21 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0023-y">CrossRef 9. Dennison FJ, Azapagic A, Clift R, Colbourne JS (1998) Assessing management options for wastewater treatment works in the context of life cycle assessment. Water Sci Technol 38(11):23-0 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00636-2">CrossRef 10. Emmerson RHC, Morse GK, Lester JN, Edge DR (1995) The life-cycle analysis of small scale sewage-treatment processes. J Ciwem 9:317-25 11. European Parliament (2000) Water Framework Directive, 2000/60/EC. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 327, 22 Dec 2000, Brussels 12. Fagan JE, Reuter MA, Langford KJ (2010) Dynamic performance metrics to assess sustainability and cost effectiveness of integrated urban water systems. Resour Conserv Recy 54:719-36 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.12.002">CrossRef 13. Friedrich E, Pillay S, Buckley CA (2009) Carbon footprint analysis for increasing water supply and sanitation in South Africa: a case study. J Clean Prod 17:1-2 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.03.004">CrossRef 14. General Programme Instructions for Environmental Product Declarations (EPD) (2008). Available from ef="http://www.environdec.com/documents/pdf/EPD_instructions_080229.pdf" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.environdec.com/documents/pdf/EPD_instructions_080229.pdf 15. Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya MM, Mekonnen MM (2011) The water footprint assessment manual: setting the global standard. Earthscan Ltd, Dunstan House, 14a St Cross Street, London EC1N 8XA, UK. Earthscan LLC, 1616 P Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA 16. Hellstr?n D, Jeppsson U, K?rrman E (2000) A framework for systems analysis of sustainable urban water management. Environ Impact Asses 20:311-21 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00043-3">CrossRef 17. ISO (2006a) Environmental management, life cycle assessment. European Standard EN ISO14040-14044. International Organization for Standardization 18. ISO (2006b) Environmental labels and declarations. Type III environmental declarations. Principles and procedures. European Standard ISO 14025. International Organization for Standardization 19. Jones SA, Silva C (2009) A practical method to evaluate the sustainability of rural water and sanitation infrastructure systems in developing countries. Desalination 248:500-09 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.05.094">CrossRef 20. Kao JJ, Pan TC, Lin CM (2009) An environmental sustainability based budget allocation system for regional water quality management. J Environ Manage 90:699-09 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.01.003">CrossRef 21. Klostermann JEM, Cramer J (2007) Social construction of sustainability in water companies in the Dutch coastal zone. J Cleaner Prod 15:1573-584 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.031">CrossRef 22. Kl?pffer W (2005) Life cycle assessment in the mirror of Int J LCA: past, present, and future. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(6):379-80 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/lca2005.11.001">CrossRef 23. Landu L, Brent AC (2006) Environmental life cycle assessment of water supply in South Africa: the Rosslyn industrial area as a case study. Water SA 32(2):249-56 24. Lenzen M, Lundie S, Bransgrove G, Charet L, Sack F (2003) Assessing the ecological footprint of a large metropolitan water supplier: lessons for water management and planning towards sustainability. J Environ Plann Man 46(1):113-41 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713676700">CrossRef 25. Lundin M, Morrison GM (2002) A life cycle assessment based procedure for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems. Urban Water 4:145-52 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00015-8">CrossRef 26. Mahgoub MEM, van der Steen NP, Abu-Zeid K, Vairavamoorthy K (2010) Towards sustainability in urban water: a life cycle analysis of the urban water system of Alexandria City, Egypt. J Cleaner Prod 18:1100-106 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.009">CrossRef 27. Meneses M, Pasqualino JC, Castells F (2010) Environmental assessment of urban wastewater reuse: treatment alternatives and applications. Chemosphere 81:266-72 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.05.053">CrossRef 28. Minciardi R, Robba M, Sacile R (2007) Decision models for sustainable groundwater planning and control. Control Eng Pract 15(8):1013-029 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2006.10.017">CrossRef 29. Mu?oz I, Rodríguez A, Rosal R, Fernández-Alba AR (2009) Life cycle assessment of urban wastewater reuse with ozonation as tertiary treatment: a focus on toxicity-related impacts. Sci Total Environ 407:1245-256 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.09.029">CrossRef 30. Ortiza M, Raluya RG, Serra L (2007) Life cycle assessment of water treatment technologies: wastewater and water-reuse in a small town. Desalination 204(1-):121-31 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.04.026">CrossRef 31. PCR 2011:12 (2011) Product-Category Rules for UN CPC class 6921 Water distribution through mains (except steam and hot water). ef="http://www.environdec.com/en/Product-Category-Rules/Detail/?Pcr=5880" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.environdec.com/en/Product-Category-Rules/Detail/?Pcr=5880 32. Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 43(11):4098-104 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es802423e">CrossRef 33. Pfister S, Hellweg S (2009) The water “shoesize-vs. footprint of bioenergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(35):E93–E94 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908069106">CrossRef 34. Raluy GR, Serra L, Uche J (2005) Life cycle assessment of water production technologies—part 1: life cycle assessment of different commercial desalination technologies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(4):285-93 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/lca2004.09.179.1">CrossRef 35. Ridoutt BG, Eady SJ, Sellahewa J, Simons L, Bektash R (2009) Water footprinting at the product brand level: case study and future challenges. J Cleaner Prod 17(13):1228-235 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.03.002">CrossRef 36. Ridoutt BG, Pfister S (2010) A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity. Glob Environ Chang 20(1):113-20 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.08.003">CrossRef 37. Rihon AC, Lassaux S, Germain A (2002) Application of the LCA methodology to water management from the pumping station to the wastewater treatment plant. 10th SETAC LCA Case Studies Symposium, Barcelona, Spain 38. Sahely HR, Kennedy CA, Adams BJ (2005) Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems. Can J Civil Eng 32(1):72-5 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/l04-072">CrossRef 39. Supporting Annexes for Environmental Product Declarations (EPD) (2008) Available from ef="http://www.environdec.com/documents/pdf/EPD_annexes_080229.pdf" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.environdec.com/documents/pdf/EPD_annexes_080229.pdf 40. Tawfic AM (2007) Life cycle assessment, a decision-making tool in wastewater treatment facilities. In: Wastewater reuse—risk assessment, decision-making and environmental security. Springer, Dordrecht 41. United Nations Division for Sustainable Development (2005) Indicators of sustainable development-review and assessment. Expert group meeting on indicators of sustainable development. New York, 13-5 December 2005. Background paper. Available from ef="http://www.asdmas.com/documentos/crp1.pdf" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.asdmas.com/documentos/crp1.pdf 42. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (2004) Urban indicators guidelines-monitoring the habitat agenda and the millennium development goals. Available from ef="http://www.unhabitat.org/programmes/guo/documents/urban_indicators_guidelines.pdf" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.unhabitat.org/programmes/guo/documents/urban_indicators_guidelines.pdf 43. Viceconte G (2004) Quaderno No. 8—Il sistema idrico in Sicilia, PON ATAS 2000-006 44. Vince F, Aoustin E, Bréant P, Marechal F (2008) LCA tool for the environmental evaluation of potable water production. Desalination 220:37-6 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.021">CrossRef 45. Vidal N, Poch M, Marti E, Rodriguez-Roda I (2002) Evaluation of the environmental implications to include structural changes in a wastewater treatment plant. J Chem Tech Biotech 77:1206-211 external" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.674">CrossRef 46. WCED (1987) Our common future, report of the world commission on environment and development. Oxford University Press, Oxford (established by the United Nations in 1983 and chaired by Mrs. Brundtland)
- 作者单位:Adriana Del Borghi (1)
Carlo Strazza (1) Michela Gallo (1) Simona Messineo (2) Massimiliano Naso (3)
1. Department of Chemical and Process Engineering “G.B. Bonino- University of Genoa, Via all’Opera Pia 15, 16145, Genoa, Italy 2. Siciliacque Spa-Via G. di Marzo, 35, 90145, Palermo, Italy 3. Acqua Solutions srl, a Veolia WST Company-Via Lampedusa, 13/D, 20141, Milan, Italy
- ISSN:1614-7502
文摘
Purpose The aim of the present paper is to describe the development of a life cycle assessment study of the service of potable water supply in Sicily, Italy. The analysis considers the stages of collection, treatment and distribution of potable water through the regional network, whilst the use stage of water is not included. Methods The selection of a methodological pattern coherently with the requirements of an environmental label, such as the EPDs, aims at allowing comparability among different studies. Results and discussion The analysis shows the shares of impacts along the life cycle chain, i.e. outputs by well fields and spring groups, purification and desalination plants, water losses in the waterworks, electrical consumption of waterworks systems and impacts of network maintenance. With regard to global warming potential (GWP), the impact of purification plants represents a 6-?% share of the total, whilst desalination is at 74?%. Water losses in the waterworks show an impact of 15-7?%; the contribution owing to electrical consumption of waterworks systems and network maintenance results to be 3?%. Desalination plants represent the major contribution to all impact categories considered. Conclusions In respect to management issues, the most relevant impact categories resulted to be GWP, non-renewable energy resources and water consumption. Since the results for non-renewable energy resources are strictly connected to GWP emissions, carbon footprint and water footprint can be profitably used as single-issue indicators without the risk of burden shifting in studies aiming to evaluate the impact of potable water distribution.
| |
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.
| |