| |
Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature
- 作者:Olivia King (1) r> Susan A Nancarrow (1) r> Alan M Borthwick (2) r> Sandra Grace (1) r>r>1. School of Health and Human Sciences ; Southern Cross University ; Lismore ; NSW ; 2480 ; Gold Coast ; Australia r> 2. Centre for Innovation and Leadership in Health Sciences ; Faculty of Health Sciences ; University of Southampton ; Southampton ; SO17 1BJ ; England r>
- 关键词:Contested boundaries ; Professional boundaries ; Inter ; professional boundaries
- 刊名:Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
- 出版年:2015
- 出版时间:December 2015
- 年:2015
- 卷:8
- 期:1
- 全文大小:663 KB
- 参考文献:1. Duckett S. Interventions to facilitate health workforce restructure. Aust N Z J Publli Heal. 2005;2:14. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-2-14" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 2. Foot D, Gomez R. Population ageing and sectoral growth: the case of the UK 2006鈥?026. Oxf J Bus Econ. 2006;5:85鈥?4. r> 3. Bosley S, Dale J. Healthcare assistants in general practice: practical and conceptual issues of skill-mix change. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58:118鈥?4. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp08X277032" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 4. Bach S, Kessler I, Heron P. Nursing a grievance? The role of healthcare assistants in a modernized national health service. Gend Work Organ. 2012;19:205鈥?4. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00502.x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 5. Townson M. Developing a sustainable podiatry workforce for the UK towards 2030. London: Society of Chiropodists & Podiatrists; 2014. r> 6. Diabetes in Australia. [ref="http://www.diabetesaustralia.com.au/Understanding-Diabetes/Diabetes-in-Australia/" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.diabetesaustralia.com.au/Understanding-Diabetes/Diabetes-in-Australia/] r> 7. McPherson K, Kersten P, George S, Lattimer V, Breton A, Bridgets E, et al. A systematic review of evidence about extended roles for allied health professionals. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006;11:240鈥?. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/135581906778476544" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 8. Nancarrow S, Borthwick A. Dynamic professional boundaries in the healthcare workforce. Sociol Health Illn. 2005;27:897鈥?19. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00463.x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 9. Masterson A. Cross-boundary working: a macro-political analysis of the impact on professional roles. J Clin Nurs. 2002;11:331鈥?. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00604.x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 10. Borthwick A. Challenging Medicine: the case of podiatric surgery. Work Employ Soc. 2000;14:369鈥?3. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09500170022118455" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 11. Borthwick A. Occupational imperialism at work: the case of podiatric surgery. Br J Podiatr. 2001;4:70鈥?. r> 12. Isaac A, Gwilym S, Reilly I, Kilmartin T, Ribbans W. Interprofessional relationships between orthopaedic and podiatric surgeons in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90:663鈥?0. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588408X318183" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 13. O鈥橩ane C, Kilmartin T. Orthopaedic and podiatric surgery: Will you get the same operation? Pod Now. 2007;10:24鈥?. r> 14. Currie G, Finn R, Martin G. Professional competition and modernizing the clinical workforce in the NHS. Work Employ Soc. 2009;23:267鈥?4. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0950017009102858" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 15. Larkin G. Occupational monopoly and modern medicine. London: Tavistock; 1983. r> 16. Larkin G. Medical dominance in britain: image and historical reality. Millbank Q. 1988;66:117鈥?2. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3349918" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 17. Parkin F. Marxism and class theory: a bourgeois critique. London: Tavistock; 1979. r> 18. Saks M. Removing the blinkers? A critique of recent contributions to the sociology of professions. Sociol Rev. 1983;31:1鈥?1. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1983.tb00677.x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 19. Nancarrow S, Moran A, AM B, Buchan J, Dixon D, Enderby P, et al. The impact of workforce flexibility on the costs and outcomes of older peoples鈥?services: a policy and literature review. Sheffield: University of Sheffield School of Health and Related Research; 2006. r> 20. Sanders T, Harrison S. Professional legitimacy claims in the multidisciplinary workplace: the case of heart failure care. Sociol Health Illn. 2008;30:289鈥?08. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01052.x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 21. Martin G. Interprofessional Boundaries. In: Cockerham W, Dingwall R, Quah S, editors. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behaviour and Society. London: John Wiley and Sons; 2014. r> 22. Freidson E. Profession of medicine - a study of the sociology of applied knowledge. London: University of Chicago Press; 1988. r> 23. Larkin G. Professional autonomy and the ophthalmic optician. Sociol Health Illn. 1981;3:15鈥?0. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11343591" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 24. Willis E. Medical Dominance: The Division of Labour in Australian Healthcare (2nd Ed). London: George Allen and Unwin; 1989. r> 25. Timmons S, Tanner J. A disputed occupational boundary: operating theatre nurses and operating department practitioners. Sociol Health Illn. 2004;26:645鈥?6. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00409.x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 26. Booth A. Brimful of STARLITE: towards standards for reporting literature searches. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;94:421. r> 27. Brooks J, King N. Qualitative psychology in the real world: the utility of template analysis. In: British Psychological Society Annual Conference. London: BPS; 2012. r> 28. Qualitative Research Checklist. [ref="http://www.caspinternational.org/mod_product/uploads/CASP%20Qualitative%20Research%20Checklist%2031.05.13.pdf" class="a-plus-plus">http://www.caspinternational.org/mod_product/uploads/CASP%20Qualitative%20Research%20Checklist%2031.05.13.pdf] r> 29. Martin G, Currie G, Finn R. Reconfiguring or reproducing intraprofessional boundaries? Specialist expertise, generalist knowledgeand the 鈥榤odenization鈥?of the medical workforce. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:1191鈥?. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.006" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 30. McIntyre M, Francis K, Chapman Y. The struggle for contested boundaries in the move to collaborative care teams in Australian maternity care. Midwifery. 2012;28:298鈥?05. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.04.004" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 31. Norris P. How 鈥榳e鈥?are different from 鈥榯hem鈥? occupational boundary maintenance in the treament of musculo-skeletal problems. Sociol Health Illn. 2001;23:24鈥?3. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00239" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 32. Salhani D, Coulter I. The politics of interprofessional working and the struggle for professional autonomy in nursing. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:1221鈥?. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.041" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 33. Borthwick A, Short A, Nancarrow SA, Boyce RA. Non-Medical Prescribing in Australia and the UK: the Case of Podiatry. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3:1. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-3-1" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 34. Moran A, Nancarrow S, Enderby P. Are we using support workers effectively? The relationship between patient and team characteristics and support worker utilisation in older people鈥檚 community based rehabilitation services in England. Health Soc Care Community. 2012;20:537鈥?9. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01065.x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 35. Moran A, Nancarrow S, Wiseman L, Maher K, Boyce RA, Borthwick A, et al. Assisting role redesign: a qualitative evaluation of the implementation of a podiatry assistant role to a community health setting utilising a traineeship approach. J Foot Ankle Res. 2012;5:30. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-5-30" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 36. Witz A. Professions and patriarchy. London: Routledge; 1992. rnal" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203167786" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef r> 37. Hugman R. Power in the caring professions. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1991. r>
- 刊物主题:Orthopedics; Rehabilitation;
- 出版者:BioMed Central
- ISSN:1757-1146
文摘
Background Across the Western world, demographic changes have led to healthcare policy trends in the direction of role flexibility, challenging established role boundaries and professional hierarchies. Population ageing is known to be associated with a rise in prevalence of chronic illnesses which, coupled with a reducing workforce, now places much greater demands on healthcare provision. Role flexibility within the health professions has been identified as one of the key innovative practice developments which may mitigate the effects of these demographic changes and help to ensure a sustainable health provision into the future. However, it is clear that policy drives to encourage and enable greater role flexibility among the health professions may also lead to professional resistance and inter-professional role boundary disputes. In the foot and ankle arena, this has been evident in areas such as podiatric surgery, podiatrist prescribing and extended practice in diabetes care, but it is far from unique to podiatry. Methods A systematic review of the literature identifying examples of disputed role boundaries in health professions was undertaken, utilising the STARLITE framework and adopting a focus on the specific characteristics and outcomes of boundary disputes. Synthesis of the data was undertaken via template analysis, employing a thematic organisation and structure. Results The review highlights the range of role boundary disputes across the health professions, and a commonality of events preceding each dispute. It was notable that relatively few disputes were resolved through recourse to legal or regulatory mandates. Conclusions Whilst there are a number of different strategies underpinning boundary disputes, some common characteristics can be identified and related to existing theory. Importantly, horizontal substitution invokes more overt role boundary disputes than other forms, with less resolution, and with clear implications for professions working within the foot and ankle arena.
| |
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.
| |