| |
The European technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools under the water framework directive
- 作者:Ann-Sofie Wernersson (1)
Mario Carere (2) Chiara Maggi (3) Petr Tusil (4) Premysl Soldan (4) Alice James (5) Wilfried Sanchez (5) Valeria Dulio (5) Katja Broeg (6) Georg Reifferscheid (7) Sebastian Buchinger (7) Hannie Maas (8) Esther Van Der Grinten (9) Simon O鈥橳oole (10) Antonella Ausili (3) Loredana Manfra (3) Laura Marziali (11) Stefano Polesello (11) Ines Lacchetti (2) Laura Mancini (2) Karl Lilja (12) Maria Linderoth (12) Tove Lundeberg (12) Bengt Fj盲llborg (1) Tobias Porsbring (1) DG Joakim Larsson (13) Johan Bengtsson-Palme (13) Lars F枚rlin (13) Cornelia Kienle (14) Petra Kunz (14) Etienne Vermeirssen (14) Inge Werner (14) Craig D Robinson (15) Brett Lyons (16) Ioanna Katsiadaki (16) Caroline Whalley (17) Klaas den Haan (18) Marlies Messiaen (19) Helen Clayton (20) Teresa Lettieri (21) Raquel Negr茫o Carvalho (21) Bernd Manfred Gawlik (21) Henner Hollert (22) Carolina Di Paolo (22) Werner Brack (23) Ulrike Kammann (24) Robert Kase (14)
1. Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management ; Gullbergs Strandgata 15 ; G枚teborg ; 404 39 ; Sweden 2. Department of Environment and Primary Prevention ; ISS-Italian Institute of Health ; Viale Regina Elena ; 299 ; 00161 ; Rome ; Italy 3. ISPRA - Institute for Environmental Protection and Research ; Via Brancati 48 ; 00144 ; Rome ; Italy 4. T.G. Masaryk Water Research Institute ; Podbabsk谩 2582/30 ; 6 ; 160 00 ; Praha ; Czech Republic 5. National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks INERIS ; Rue Jacques Taffanel ; 60550 ; Verneuil en Halatte ; France 6. Baltic Eye ; 脰stersj枚centrum ; Stockholms Universitet ; SE-106 91 ; Universitetsv盲gen 10 A ; Stockholms ; Sweden 7. Federal Institute of Hydrology ; Am Mainzer Tor 1 ; 56068 ; Koblenz ; Germany 8. Rijkswaterstaat ; Water ; Traffic and Environment ; Zuiderwagenplein 2 ; 8224 ; Lelystad ; The Netherlands 9. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) ; 3720 ; Postbus 1 ; BA ; Bilthoven ; The Netherlands 10. EPA ; Johnstown Castle Estate ; PO Box 3000 ; Wexford ; Ireland 11. IRSA-CNR ; Via del Mulino 19 ; 20047 ; Brugherio ; Italy 12. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency ; Naturv氓rdsverket ; SE-106 48 ; Stockholm ; Sweden 13. University of Gothenburg ; Guldhedsgatan 10 ; SE-405 30 ; Gothenburg ; Sweden 14. Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology Eawag-EPFL ; 脺berlandstrasse 133 ; CH-8600 ; D眉bendorf ; Switzerland 15. Marine Scotland Science ; 375 Victoria Road ; AB11 9DB ; Aberdeen ; Scotland 16. Cefas ; Pakefield Road ; Lowestoft ; Suffolk ; NR33 0HT ; UK 17. Defra ; Area 3D ; Nobel House ; Smith Square ; London ; SW1P 3JR ; UK 18. CONCAWE ; Vorstlaan165 ; B-1160 ; Brussels ; Belgium 19. Eurometaux ; Avenue de Broqueville 12 ; B-1150 ; Brussels ; Belgium 20. DG Environment - European Commission ; Avenue de Beaulieu 9 ; B-1160 ; Brussels ; Belgium 21. DG Joint Research Centre - European Commission ; Via Enrico Fermi 2749 ; I-21027 ; Ispra ; Italy 22. Department of Ecosystem Analysis ; Institute for Environmental Research ; ABBt RWTH Aachen University ; Worringerweg 1 ; 52074 ; Aachen ; Germany 23. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ ; Permoserstra脽e 15 ; 04318 ; Leipzig ; Germany 24. Th眉nen-Institut of Fisheries-Ecology ; Palmaille 9 ; 22767 ; Hamburg ; Germany
- 关键词:Effect ; based tools ; Priority substances ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Water Framework Directive ; Bioassays ; Chemical pollution ; Biomarkers
- 刊名:Environmental Sciences Europe
- 出版年:2015
- 出版时间:December 2015
- 年:2015
- 卷:27
- 期:1
- 全文大小:435 KB
- 参考文献:Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Union L327: pp. 1-73
2013. Off J Eur Union L 226: pp. 1-17 1. European Union: communication from the commission to the council. The combination effects of chemicals. COM/2012/0252 final, 31/05/2012, pp. 1鈥?0. 2. Silva, E, Rajapakse, N, Kortenkamp, A (2002) Something from 鈥渘othing鈥?- eight weak estrogenic chemicals combined at concentrations below NOECs produce significant mixture effects. Environ Sci Technol 2002: pp. 1751-6 CrossRef 3. Quevauviller, P, Carere, M, Polesello, S (2012) Chemical monitoring activity for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. Trends Anal Chem 36: pp. 1-184 CrossRef 4. Wernersson, AS, Maggi, C, Carere, M (2014) Technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools. Technical Report 2014鈥?77. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg 5. Hallare, AV, Seiler, TB, Hollert, H (2011) The versatile, changing, and advancing roles of fish in sediment toxicity assessment-a review. J Soils Sedim 11: pp. 141-73 CrossRef 6. Green N, Sch酶yen M, 脴xnevad S, Ruus A, H酶g氓sen T, Beylich B, H氓vardstun J, Rogne 脜, Tveiten L. Hazardous substances in fjords and coastal waters - 2010. Levels, trends and effects. Long-term monitoring of environmental quality in Norwegian coastal waters. Norwegian State Pollution Monitoring Programme Report no. 1111/2011. TA-no. 2862/2011. 252, 2011. 7. Chapman D, Jackson J (1996): Biological monitoring. In Water Quality Monitoring - A Practical Guide to the Design and Implementation of Freshwater Quality Studies and Monitoring Programmes. Edited by Jamie Bartram and Richard Balance Published on behalf of United Nations Environment Programme and the World Health Organization. ISBN 0 419 22320 7. (Hbk) 0419217304 (PBK). 8. Connon, RE, Geist, J, Werner, I (2012) Effect-based tools for monitoring and predicting the ecotoxicological effects of chemicals in the aquatic environments. Sensors 12: pp. 12741-71 CrossRef 9. Leusch, FL, Jager, C, Levi, Y, Lim, R, Puijker, L, Sacher, F (2010) Comparison of five in vitro bioassays to measure estrogenic activity in environmental waters. Environ Sci Technol 44: pp. 3853-60 CrossRef 10. Wernersson AS: Swedish monitoring of hazardous substances in the aquatic environment-current vs required monitoring and potential developments. L盲nsstyrelsen I V盲stra G枚talands l盲n. Rapport 2012:23. 11. Piva, F, Ciaprini, F, Onorati, F, Benedetti, M, Fattorini, D, Ausili, A (2011) Assessing sediment hazard through a weight of evidence approach with bioindicator organisms: a practical model to elaborate data from sediment chemistry, bioavailability, biomarkers and ecotoxicological bioassays. Chemosphere 2011: pp. 475-85 CrossRef 12. Ahlf, W, Heise, S (2005) Sediment toxicity assessment: rationale for effect classes. J Soils Sedim 5: pp. 16-20 CrossRef 13. Sanchez, W, Porcher, JM (2009) Fish biomarkers for environmental monitoring within the water framework directive. Trends Anal Chem 28: pp. 150-8 CrossRef 14. Usseglio-Polatera, P, Bournaud, M, Richoux, P, Tachet, H (2000) Biological and ecological traits of benthic freshwater macroinvertebrates: relationships and definition of groups with similar traits. Freshwater Biol 43: pp. 175-205 CrossRef 15. Brink, PJ, Alexander, AC, Desrosiers, M, Goedkoop, W, Goethals, PLM, Liess, M (2011) Traits-based approaches in bioassessment and ecological risk assessment: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Integr Environ Assess Managem 7: pp. 198-208 CrossRef 16. Sch盲fer, R, Vd Ohe, P, Rasmussen, J, Kefford, B, Beketov, M, Schulz, R (2012) Thresholds for the effects of pesticides on invertebrate communities and leaf breakdown in stream ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol 46: pp. 5134-42 CrossRef 17. Blanck, H, W盲ngberg, S-脜 (1988) Induced community tolerance in marine periphyton established under arsenate stress. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45: pp. 1816-9 CrossRef 18. Pesce, S, Lissalde, S, Lavieille, D, Margoum, C, Mazzella, N, Roubeix, V (2010) Evaluation of single and joint toxic effects of diuron and its main metabolites on natural phototrophic biofilms using a pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT) approach. Aquat Toxicol 99: pp. 492-9 CrossRef 19. Burgess, RM, Ho, KT, Brack, W, Lamoree, M (2013) Effect-directed analysis (EDA) and toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) (2013): complementary but different approaches for diagnosing causes of environmental toxicity. Environ Toxicol Chem 32: pp. 1935-45 CrossRef 20. Brack, W (2003) Effect-directed analysis: a promising tool for the identification of organic toxicants in complex mixtures (2003). Anal Bioanal Chem 377: pp. 397-407 CrossRef 21. Gunnarsson L, Kristiansson E, Larsson DGJ (2012): Environmental comparative pharmacology: theory and application. In B.W. Brooks and D.B. Huggett (eds.), Human Pharmaceuticals in the Environment:Current and Future Perspectives, Emerging Topics in Ecotoxicology 4, doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3473-3_5, Springer Science鈥?鈥塀usiness Media. 22. Kosmehl, T, Otte, JC, Yang, L, Legradi, J, Bluhm, K, Zinsmeister, C (2012) A combined DNA-microarray and mechanism-specific toxicity approach with zebrafish embryos to investigate the pollution of river sediments. Reprod Toxicol 33: pp. 245-53 CrossRef 23. Wang, Z, Gerstein, M, Snyder, M (2009) RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 10: pp. 57-63 CrossRef 24. Riesenfeld, CS, Schloss, PD, Handelsman, J (2004) Metagenomics: genomic analysis of microbial communities. Annu Rev Genet 38: pp. 525-52 CrossRef 25. Anderson, NL, Anderson, NG (1998) Proteome and proteomics: new technologies, new concepts, and new words. Electrophoresis 19: pp. 1853-61 CrossRef 26. Samuelsson, LM, F枚rlin, L, Karlsson, G, Adolfsson-Erici, M, Larsson, JDG (2006) Using NMR metabolomics to identify responses of an environmental estrogen in blood plasma of fish. Aquat Toxicol 78: pp. 341-9 CrossRef 27. Kase R, Clayton H, Martini F: Science-Policy Interface (SPI) activity on prioritisation of research needs, knowledge availability and dissemination for the Working Group E (Chemical Aspects) 2010鈥?012. Open available at CIRCABC at: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/5bf63ff3-b24b-4365-8a57-38e4d56b941.
- 刊物主题:Environment, general; Pollution, general; Ecotoxicology;
- 出版者:Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- ISSN:2190-4715
文摘
The Water Framework Directive (WFD), 2000/60/EC, requires an integrated approach to the monitoring and assessment of the quality of surface water bodies. The chemical status assessment is based on compliance with legally binding Environmental Quality Standards (EQSs) for selected chemical pollutants (priority substances) of EU-wide concern. In the context of the mandate for the period 2010 to 2012 of the subgroup Chemical Monitoring and Emerging Pollutants (CMEP) under the Common Implementation Strategy (CIS) for the WFD, a specific task was established for the elaboration of a technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools. The activity was chaired by Sweden and co-chaired by Italy and progressively involved several Member States and stakeholders in an EU-wide drafting group. The main aim of this technical report was to identify potential effect-based tools (e.g. biomarkers and bioassays) that could be used in the context of the different monitoring programmes (surveillance, operational and investigative) linking chemical and ecological status assessment. The present paper summarizes the major technical contents and findings of the report.
| |
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.
| |