Customer requirement prioritization on QFD: a new proposal based on the generalized Yager’s algorithm
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Fiorenzo Franceschini ; Domenico Maisano…
  • 关键词:QFD ; Customer requirements ; Prioritization ; Relative importance ratings ; Generalized Yager’s algorithm (GYA) ; Preference ordering ; Fusion
  • 刊名:Research in Engineering Design
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:April 2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:26
  • 期:2
  • 页码:171-187
  • 全文大小:522 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Burke, E, Kloeber, JM, Deckro, RF (2002) Using and abusing QFD scores. Qual Eng 15: pp. 9-21 CrossRef
    2. Buyukozkan, G, Ertay, T, Kahraman, C, Ruan, D (2004) Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach. Int J Intell Syst 19: pp. 443-461 CrossRef
    3. Buyukozkan, G, Feyzioglu, O, Ruan, D (2007) Fuzzy group decision-making to multiple preference formats in quality function deployment. Comput Ind 58: pp. 392-402 CrossRef
    4. Chan, LK, Wua, ML (2002) Quality function deployment: a comprehensive review of its concepts and methods. Qual Eng 15: pp. 23-35 CrossRef
    5. Chaudha, A, Jain, R, Singh, AR, Mishra, PK (2011) Integration of Kano’s model into quality function deployment (QFD). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53: pp. 689-698 CrossRef
    6. Chen, LH, Chen, CN (2014) Normalisation models for prioritising design requirements for quality function deployment processes. Int J Prod Res 52: pp. 299-313 CrossRef
    7. Chen, CW, Huang, ST (2011) Implementing KM programmes using fuzzy QFD. Total Qual Manag 22: pp. 387-406 CrossRef
    8. Chuang, PT (2001) Combining the analytic hierarchy process and quality function deployment for a location decision from a requirement perspective. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 18: pp. 842-849 CrossRef
    9. Figueira, J, Greco, S, Ehrgott, M (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, New York
    10. Franceschini, F (2002) Advanced quality function deployment. CRC Press, Boca Raton
    11. Franceschini, F, Rossetto, S (2002) QFD: an interactive algorithm for the prioritization of product’s technical design characteristics. Integr Manuf Syst 13: pp. 69-75 CrossRef
    12. Franceschini, F, Galetto, M, Maisano, D (2007) Management by measurement: designing key indicators and performance measurement systems. Springer, Berlin
    13. Franceschini F, Maisano D, Mastrogiacomo L (2015) A new proposal for fusing individual preference orderings by rank-ordered agents: a generalization of the Yager’s algorithm. Eur J Oper Res (forthcoming)
    14. Gonzalez, ME, Quesada, G, Bahill, AT (2003) Improving product design using quality function deployment: the school furniture case in developing countries. Qual Eng 16: pp. 47-58 CrossRef
    15. Griffin, A, Hauser, JR (1993) The voice of customer. Mark Sci 12: pp. 1-27 CrossRef
    16. Hauser, JR, Clausing, D (1988) The house of quality. Harvard Bus Rev 66: pp. 63-73
    17. Iqbal, Z, Grigg, NP, Govinderaju, K, Campbell-Allen, N (2014) Statistical comparison of final weight scores in quality function deployment (QFD) studies. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 31: pp. 184-204 CrossRef
    18. Jiao, JR, Chen, CH (2006) Customer requirement management in product development: a review of research issues. Concur Eng 14: pp. 173-185 CrossRef
    19. Karsak, EE, Sozer, S, Alptekin, SE (2002) Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Comput Ind Eng 44: pp. 171-190 CrossRef
    20. Kwong, CK, Bai, H (2002) A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment. J Intell Manuf 13: pp. 367-377
文摘
The focus of this paper is on the prioritization of customer requirements (CRs) in the quality function deployment (QFD) process. There are numerous techniques for this task, which are based on different types of judgements (e.g., in the form of preference orderings, relative importance ratings, paired comparisons), generally collected by questionnaires/interviews. Unfortunately, many of these techniques violate some properties of the scales on which judgements are defined and/or are not flexible and user-friendly for respondents. This paper introduces a prioritization technique based on a recent algorithm—denominated as generalized Yager’s algorithm—aimed at fusing the preference orderings by multiple respondents into a single ordering. This technique can be applied even when (1) some CRs are tied or omitted in the individual preference orderings, and (2) respondents have a hierarchical importance ranking. Also, the procedure is automatable and relatively robust and provides a solution which is consistent with the preference orderings. The description is supported by a realistic application example, concerning the prioritization of QFD’s CRs in the design of an aircraft seat.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.