Further observations on chromosome diversity analysis in wild species of Vigna from India

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Anju Shamurailatpam ; Daniel Regie Wahlang ; Latha Madhavan…
• 关键词：Vigna ; Wild species ; Karyotype ; Asymmetry index ; NOR ; chromosomes
• 刊名：The Nucleus
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：December 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：58
• 期：3
• 页码：225-230
• 全文大小：507 KB
• 参考文献：1.Arora RK. Diversity and collection of wild Vigna species in India. FAO/IBPGR Plant Genet Res Newslet. 1985;63:26–33.
  2.Battaglia E. Chromosome morphology and terminology. Caryologia. 1955;6:179–87.CrossRef
  3.Bisht IS, Bhat KV, Lakhanpaul S, Latha M, Jayan PK, Biswas BK, Singh AK. Diversity and genetic resources of wild Vigna species in India. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2005;52:53–68.CrossRef
  4.Chandel KPS, Joshi BS, Pant KC. Genetic resources of Vigna species in India, their distribution, diversity and utilization in crop improvement. Ann Agric Res. 1982;3:19–34.
  5.Goel S, Raina SN, Ogihara Y. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic implications of internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA in the Phaseolus-Vigna complex. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002;22:1–19.CrossRef PubMed
  6.Hynneiwta M, Malik SK, Rao SR. Karyological studies in ten species of Citrus (linnaues, 1753) (rutaceae) of North East India. Comp Cytogen. 2011;5:277–87.CrossRef
  7.Kumar A, Rao SR. Cytological investigations in some important tree species of Rajasthan I. Karyomorphological studies in some species of Anogeissus (DC.) Guill., Perr. & A. Rich. Silvae Genet. 2002;51:100–4.
  8.Ladeinde TAO, Raharajeswari S, Oguike J, Cole T. The karyotype of meiotic chromosomes of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L. Walp) Nigerian. J Basic Appl Sci. 1980;14:1–2.
  9.Lewis GP, Schrine B, Mackinder B, Lock JM. Legumes of the world. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens; 2005.
  10.Matsubayashi O. Phylogenetic relationships in the potato and its related species. In: Tsuchiya T, Gupta PK. (eds.): Chromosome engineering in plants: genetics, breeding, evolution, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. part B;1991. p. 93–118.
  11.Paszko B A critical review and a new proposal of karyotype asymmetry indices. Plant Syst and Evol. 2006;258:39–48.CrossRef
  12.Raina SN, Mukai Y. Detection of a variable number of 18S-5.8S-26S and 5S ribosomal DNA loci by fluorescent in situ hybridization in diploid and tetraploid Arachis species. Genome. 1999;42:52–9.CrossRef
  13.Rao SR, Chandel KPS. Karyomorphological studies in the cultivated and wild vigna species in Indian gene Centre. Cytologia. 1991;56:47–57.CrossRef
  14.Rao SR, Raina SN. Studies on male meiosis in cultivated and wild Vigna species. In: Srivastava PS, Narula A, Srivastava S, editors. Plant biotechnology and molecular markers. Netherlands: Springer; 2004. p. 331–45.
  15.Rawat D, Sharma SK, Mahmoudi A, Rao SR. Cytogenetic rationale for probable amphidiploid origin of Dipcadi erythraeum Webb. & berth. - a rare and endemic plant of Indian Thar desert. Caryologia. 2011;64:75–83.CrossRef
  16.Shamurailatpam A. Molecular Cytogenetic Studies on Inter- and Intraspecific Variation in Vigna Species from North-East India. PhD. Thesis, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong; 2014.
  17.Shamurailatpam A, Madhavan L, Yadav SR, Bhat KV, Rao SR. Chromosome diversity analysis in various species of Vigna savi from India. Nucleus. 2012;55:107–14.CrossRef
  18.Shamurailatpam A, Madhavan L, Yadav SR, Bhat KV, Rao SR. Heterochromatin characterization through differential fluorophore binding pattern in some species of Vigna savi. Protoplasma. 2015;252:629–35.CrossRef PubMed
  19.Shamurailatpam A, Madhavan L, Yadav SR, Bhat KV, Rao SR. Heterochromatin distribution and comparative karyo-morphological studies in Vigna umbellata Thunberg, 1969 and V. aconitifolia jacquin, 1969 (fabaceae) accessions. Comp Cytogen. 2015;9:119–32.CrossRef
  20.Sharma SK, Rajkumari K, Kumaria S, Tandon P, Rao SR. Karyomorphological characterization of natural genetic variation in some threatened Cymbidium species of northeast India. Caryologia. 2010;63:99–105.CrossRef
  21.Singh A, Roy RP. Karyological studies in Trigonella, Indigofera and Phaseolus. The Nucleus. 1970;13:41–54.
  22.Singh RJ. The handling of plant chromosomes: Plant Cytogenetics.CRC Press; 1993.
  23.Stace CA. Cytology and cytogenetics as a fundamental taxonomic resource for the 20th and 21st centuries. Taxon. 2000;49:451–77.CrossRef
  24.Stebbins GL. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Edward Arnold Ltd.; 1971.
  
• 作者单位：Anju Shamurailatpam (1)
  Daniel Regie Wahlang (1)
  Latha Madhavan (2)
  Shrirang Ramachandra Yadav (3)
  Kangila Venkataraman Bhat (4)
  Satyawada Rama Rao (1)
  
  1. Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong, 793022, India
  2. National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Regional Station, Vellanikkara, Thrissur, , 680654, India
  3. Department of Botany, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, , 416004, India
  4. National Research Centre on DNA Fingerprinting, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa, New Delhi,, 110012, India
  
• 刊物主题：Cell Biology;
• 出版者：Springer India
• ISSN：0976-7975

文摘

Ten wild species of Vigna from the Indian gene centre have been karyo-morphologically analysed. All the studied taxa had somatic chromosome number of 2n = 22 except V. glabrescens which had 2n = 44. The chromosomes were found to be either metacentric, submetacentric and subtelocentric in type with their respective chromosome complements, and the complete absence of telocentric chromosomes in all of the taxa studied. The karyotypes of the species were mostly symmetrical. The significance of karyotypic variation among wild species in comparison with the cultivated ones of the genus Vigna has been discussed in detail. Such information has value in understanding cytogenetical relationship amongst these wild species reported to comprise of genes for resistance to insect, pests and diseases. Keywords Vigna Wild species Karyotype Asymmetry index NOR-chromosomes