| |
Testing Macro Models by Indirect Inference: A Survey for Users
- 作者:Vo Phuong Mai Le ; David Meenagh ; Patrick Minford ; Michael Wickens…
- 关键词:Bootstrap ; DSGE ; New Keynesian ; New classical ; Indirect inference ; Wald statistic ; Likelihood ratio ; C12 ; C32 ; C52 ; E1
- 刊名:Open Economies Review
- 出版年:2016
- 出版时间:February 2016
- 年:2016
- 卷:27
- 期:1
- 页码:1-38
- 全文大小:986 KB
- 参考文献:Basawa IV, Mallik AK, McCormick WP, Reeves JH, Taylor RL (1991) Bootstrapping unstable first-order autoregressive processes. Ann Stat 19:1098–1101CrossRef
Bernanke BS, Gertler M, Gilchrist S (1999) The financial accelerator in a business cycle framework, Handbook of Macroeconomics. In: Taylor JB, Woodford M (eds), vol 1, ch. 21. Elsevier, pp 1341–1393 Canova F (1994) Statistical inference in calibrated models. J Appl Econ 9:S123–144CrossRef Canova F (1995) Sensitivity analysis and model evaluation in dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models. Int Econ Rev 36:477–501CrossRef Canova F (2005) Methods for Applied Macroeconomic Research. Princeton University Press, Princeton Christiano L (2007) Comment on ‘On the fit of new Keynesian models’. J Bus Econ Stat 25:143–151CrossRef Christiano LJ, Eichenbaum M, Evans CL (2005) Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy. J Polit Econ 113(1):1–45CrossRef Clarida R, Gali J, Gertler ML (1999) The science of monetary policy: A new Keynesian perspective. J Econ Lit 37(4):1661–1707CrossRef Dai L, Minford P, Zhou P (2014) A DSGE model of China, cardiff economics working paper No E2014/4, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section; also CEPR discussion paper 10238, CEPR, London Dave C, Jong D, DN (2007) Structural macroeconomics. Princeton University Press Del Negro M, Schorfheide F (2004) Priors from general equilibrium models for VARs. Int Econ Rev 45:643–673CrossRef Del Negro M, Schorfheide F (2006) How good is what you’ve got? DSGE-VAR as a toolkit for evaluating DSGE models. Economic Review Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Q2:21–37 Del Negro M, Schorfheide F, Smets F, Wouters R (2007a) On the fit of new Keynesian models. J Bus Econ Stat 25:123–143CrossRef Del Negro M, Schorfheide F, Smets F, Wouters R (2007b) Rejoinder to comments on ‘On the fit of new Keynesian models’. J Bus Econ Stat 25:159–162CrossRef Evans R, Honkapohja S (2005) Interview with Thomas J. Sargent. Macroecon Dyn 9:561–583. 2005CrossRef Faust J (2007) Comment on ‘On the fit of new Keynesian models. J Bus Econ Stat 25:154–156CrossRef Fernandez-Villaverde J, Rubio-Ramirez F, Sargent T, Watson M (2007) ABCs (and Ds) of understanding VARs. American Economic Review 97:1021–1026CrossRef Friedman M (1953) The methodology of positive economics, in essays in positive economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Gallant AR (2007) Comment on ‘On the fit of new Keynesian models’. J Bus Econ Stat 25:151–152CrossRef Gourieroux C, Monfort A (1995) Simulation based econometric methods. CORE lectures series, Louvain-la-Neuve Gourieroux C, Monfort A, Renault E (1993) Indirect inference. J Appl Econ 8:S85–S118CrossRef Gregory A, Smith G (1991) Calibration as testing: Inference in simulated macro models. J Bus Econ Stat 9:293–303 Gregory A, Smith G (1993) Calibration in macroeconomics. In: Maddala G (ed) Handbook of Statistics, vol 11. Elsevier, St. Louis, Mo., pp 703–719 Hansen BE (1999) The grid bootstrap and the autoregressive model. Rev Econ Stat 81:594–607CrossRef Hansen L P, Heckman J J (1996) The empirical foundations of calibration. J Econ Perspect 10(1):87–104CrossRef Horowitz JL (2001a) The bootstrap. In: Heckman JJ, Leamer E (eds) Handbook of Econometrics, vol.5, ch. 52. Elsevier, pp 3159–3228 Horowitz JL (2001b) The bootstrap and hypothesis tests in econometrics. J Econom 100:37–40CrossRef Juillard M (2001) DYNARE: a program for the simulation of rational expectations models. Computing in economics and finance 213. Society for Computational Economics Kilian L (2007) Comment on ‘On the fit of new Keynesian models’. J Bus Econ Stat 25:156–159CrossRef Le VPM, Meenagh D, Minford P, Wickens M (2010) Two orthogonal continents? testing a two-country DSGE model of the us and the eu using indirect inference. Open Econ Rev 21(1):23–44CrossRef Le VPM, Meenagh D, Minford P, Wickens M (2011) How much nominal rigidity is there in the US economy — testing a New Keynesian model using indirect inference. J Econ Dyn Control 35(12):2078–2104CrossRef Le VPM, Meenagh D, Minford P (2012) What causes banking crises? An empirical investigation. Cardiff working paper No E2012/14, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section; also CEPR discussion paper no 9057, CEPR, London Le VPM, Meenagh D, Minford P (2014) Monetarism rides again? US monetary policy in a world of Quantitative Easing, Cardiff working paper No E2014/22, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section; also CEPR discussion paper 10250, CEPR, London Le VPM, Minford P, Wickens M (2013) A Monte Carlo procedure for checking identification in DSGE models, working paper E2013/4, Cardiff Economics Working Papers, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section; also CEPR discussion paper Le VPM, Matthews K, Meenagh D, Minford P, Xiao Z (2014) Banking and the macroeconomy in China: A banking crisis deferred Open Econ Rev 25(1):123–161CrossRef Liu C, Minford P (2014a) Comparing behavioural and rational expectations for the US post-war economy. Econ Model 43(C):407–415CrossRef Liu C, Minford P (2014b) How important is the credit channel? An empirical study of the US banking crisis. J Bank Finance 41:119–134CrossRef Lucas RE (1976) Econometric policy evaluation: A critique, Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy No. 1, The Phillips Curve and Labour markets. In: Brunner K, Meltzer A (eds) supplement to Journal of Monetary Economics McCallum BT (1976) Rational expectations and the natural rate hypothesis: some consistent estimates. Econometrica 44:4–52CrossRef Meenagh D, Minford P, Wickens M R (2009) Testing a DSGE model of the EU Using indirect inference. Open Econ Rev 20(4):435–471CrossRef Meenagh D, Minford P, Wickens M R, Xu Y (2015) Comparing Indirect inference and likelihood testing methods: asymptotic and small sample results. Working paper, Cardiff Economics Working Papers No E2015/4, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section Meenagh D, Minford P, Nowell E, Sofat P (2010) Can a real business cycle model without price and wage stickiness explain UK real exchange rate behaviour J Int Money Financ 29(6):1131–1150CrossRef Meenagh D, Minford P, Wickens MR (2012) Testing macroeconomic models by indirect inference on unfiltered data, Cardiff Working Paper No E2012/17, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section; also CEPR discussion paper no 9058, CEPR, London Minford P, Ou Z (2013) Taylor Rule or optimal timeless policy? Reconsidering the Fed’s behavior since 1982. Econ Model 32(C):113–123CrossRef Minford P, Theodoridis K, Meenagh D (2009) Testing a model of the UK by the method of indirect inference. Open Econ Rev 20(2):265–291CrossRef Minford P, Ou Z, Wickens M (2012) Revisiting the Great Moderation: policy or luck? working paper E2012/9, Cardiff Economics Working Papers, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section; forthcoming Open Economies Review Sims CA (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48:1–48CrossRef Sims CA (2007) Comment on ‘On the fit of new Keynesian models’. J Bus Econ Stat 25:152–154CrossRef Smets F, Wouters R (2003) An estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of the euro area. J Eur Econ Assoc 1(5):p1123–1175CrossRef Smets F, Wouters R (2007) Shocks and frictions in US business cycles: A Bayesian DSGE approach. Am Econ Rev 97:586–606CrossRef Smith A (1993) Estimating nonlinear time-series models using simulated vector autoregressions. J Appl Econ 8:S63–S84CrossRef Watson M (1993) Measures of fit for calibrated models. J Polit Econ 101:1011–1041CrossRef Wieland V, Wolters M H (2012) Forecasting and policy making. In: Elliott G, Timmerman A (eds) Handbook of economic forecasting, Vol. 2. Elsevier Wickens MR (1982) The efficient estimation of econometric models with rational expectations. Rev Econ Stud 49:55–67CrossRef Wickens MR (2013) How useful are DSGE macroeconomic models for forecasting? Open Econ Rev 25:171–193CrossRef
- 作者单位:Vo Phuong Mai Le (1)
David Meenagh (1) Patrick Minford (1) (2) Michael Wickens (1) (2) (3) Yongdeng Xu (1)
1. Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Aberconway Building, Colum Drive, Cardiff, CF10 3EU, UK 2. CEPR, 77 Bastwick St, London, EC1V 3PZ, UK 3. University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
- 刊物类别:Business and Economics
- 刊物主题:Economics
International Economics Development Economics
- 出版者:Springer Netherlands
- ISSN:1573-708X
文摘
With Monte Carlo experiments on models in widespread use we examine the performance of indirect inference (II) tests of DSGE models in small samples. We compare these tests with ones based on direct inference (using the Likelihood Ratio, LR). We find that both tests have power so that a substantially false model will tend to be rejected by both; but that the power of the II test is substantially greater, both because the LR is applied after re-estimation of the model error processes and because the II test uses the false model’s own restricted distribution for the auxiliary model’s coefficients. This greater power allows users to focus this test more narrowly on features of interest, trading off power against tractability. Keywords Bootstrap DSGE New Keynesian New classical Indirect inference Wald statistic Likelihood ratio
| |
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.
| |