Comprehensive flood risk assessment based on set pair analysis-variable fuzzy sets model and fuzzy AHP

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Qiang Zou (1)
  Jianzhong Zhou (1)
  Chao Zhou (2)
  Lixiang Song (1)
  Jun Guo (1)
  
• 关键词：Flood risk ; Set pair analysis ; Variable fuzzy sets ; Fuzzy AHP ; Assessment grade ; Jingjiang flood diversion district
• 刊名：Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (SERRA)
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：February 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：27
• 期：2
• 页码：525-546
• 参考文献：1. Adel HM, Madjid T (2011) An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment. Omega 39:373鈥?86 CrossRef
  2. Alexander DC (1993) Natural disasters. University College London Press, London
  3. An M, Chen Y, Baker CJ (2011) A fuzzy reasoning and fuzzy-analytical hierarchy process based approach to the process of railway risk information: a railway risk management system. Inf Sci 181(18):3946鈥?966 CrossRef
  4. Azadeh A, Osanloo M, Ataei M (2010) A new approach to mining method selection based on modifying the Nicholas technique. Appl Soft Comput 10:1040鈥?061 CrossRef
  5. Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Set Syst 17:233鈥?47 CrossRef
  6. Chen SM (1996) New methods for subjective mental workload assessment and fuzzy risk analysis. Cybern Syst 27(5):449鈥?72 CrossRef
  7. Chen SY (1998) Theory and application engineering fuzzy sets. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
  8. Chen SY (2005) Theories and methods of variable fuzzy sets in water resources and flood control system. Dalian University of Technology Press, Dalian (in Chinese)
  9. Chen SY, Guo Y (2006) Variable fuzzy sets and its application in comprehensive risk evaluation for flood-control engineering system. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 5:153鈥?62. doi:10.1007/s10700-006-7333-y CrossRef
  10. Cheng QS (1997) Attribute recognition theoretical model with application. Acta Sci Nat Univ Pekin 33(1):12鈥?0
  11. Du J, He F, Shi PJ (2006) Integrated flood risk assessment of Xiangjiang River Basin in China. J Nat Disaster 15(6):38鈥?4 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  12. Fan ZP, Liu Y (2010) A method for group decision-making based on multi-granularity uncertain linguistic information. Expert Syst Appl 37:4000鈥?008 CrossRef
  13. Feng P, Cui GT, Zhong Y (2001) On the evaluation and prediction of urban flood economic loss. J Hydraul Eng 8:64鈥?8 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  14. Ge WJ, Xing ZX (2006) Application of the improved artificial neural net on flood forecasting. Water Conserv Sci Technol Econ 12(3):165鈥?67 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  15. Huang CF (2005) Risk assessment of natural disaster鈥攖heory and practice. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
  16. Huang CF (2009) Integration degree of risk in terms of scene and application. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23(4):473鈥?84. doi:10.1007/s00477-008-0234-6 CrossRef
  17. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (1998) World disaster report. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  18. Jiang WG, Li J, Chen YH et al (2008a) Risk assessment system for regional flood disaster (I): principle and method. J Nat Disasters 17(6):53鈥?9 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  19. Jiang WG, Li J, Wu JJ (2008b) Risk assessment system for regional flood disaster (II): model and application. J Nat Disasters 17(6):105鈥?09 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  20. Jiang WG, Lei D, Chen LY et al (2009) Risk assessment and validation of flood disaster based on fuzzy mathematics. Prog Nat Sci 19:1419鈥?425 CrossRef
  21. Kaya T, Kahraman C (2011) An integrated fuzzy AHP鈥揈LECTRE methodology for environmental impact assessment. Expert Syst Appl 38:8553鈥?562 CrossRef
  22. Lai CG, Wang ZL, Song HJ (2011). Risk assessment of flood hazard in Beijing River Basin based on BP neural network. Water Resour Power 29(3): 57鈥?9, 161 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  23. Levy JK (2005) Multiple criteria decision making and decision support systems for flood risk management. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 19:438鈥?47 CrossRef
  24. Li FX (2011) Application of improved set pair analysis model for evaluation of lake eutrophication. In: 2011 International conference on computer distributed control and intelligent environmental monitoring, pp 404鈥?07
  25. Li SF, Yu P, Sun SH (2008) Fuzzy risk assessment of flood hazard based on artificial neural network for Detention Basin. China Rural Water Hydropower 6:60鈥?4 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  26. Li SF, Feng P, Sun SH (2010) Application of catastrophe theory to evaluation of flood risk in detention basin. J Nat Disasters 19(3):132鈥?38 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  27. Li WJ, Qiu L, Chen XN et al (2011) Assessment model for river ecology health based on Set Pair Analysis and Variable Fuzzy Set. J Hydraul Eng 42(7):775鈥?82 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  28. Liu JF, Li J, Liu J et al (2008) Integrated GIS/AHP-based flood risk assessment: a case study of Huaihe River Basin in China. J Nat Disasters 17(6):110鈥?14 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  29. Liu L, Zhou JZ, An XL et al (2010) Using fuzzy theory and information entropy for water quality assessment in Three Gorges region, China. Expert Syst Appl 37:2517鈥?521 CrossRef
  30. Meng CC (2010) Comprehensive assessment on the water environment quality of surface based on set pair analysis-variable fuzzy set mode. J Anhui Agric Sci 38(22):11897鈥?1899, 12046 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  31. Mo CX, Liu FG (2010) Study on evaluation method for overtopping risk degree of reservoir earth dam. J Hydraul Eng 41(3):319鈥?24 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  32. Nguyen MD, Mukand SB, Huynh TL (2011) Evaluation of flood risk parameters in the Day River Flood Diversion Area, Red River Delta, Vietnam. Nat Hazards 51(1):169鈥?94. doi:10.1007/s11069-010-9558-x
  33. Pan ZW et al (2009) Assessment model of set pair analysis for flood loss based triangular fuzzy intervals 伪-cut. In: 2009 Chinese control and decision conference, Guilin, pp 3562鈥?567
  34. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
  35. Saaty TL (1994) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24(6):19鈥?3 CrossRef
  36. Sadiq R, Tesfamariam S (2009) Environmental decision-making under uncertainty using intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IF-AHP). Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23:75鈥?1. doi:10.1007/s00477-007-0197-z CrossRef
  37. Soheil SN, Kaveh KD (2010) Application of a fuzzy TOPSIS method base on modified preference ratio and fuzzy distance measurement in assessment of traffic police centers performance. Appl Soft Comput 10:1028鈥?039 CrossRef
  38. Song LX, Zhou JZ, Li QQ et al (2011) An unstructured finite volume model for dam-break floods with wet/dry fronts over complex topography. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 67(8):960鈥?80 CrossRef
  39. Su BD, Shi YF, Jiang T et al (2006) Historic development perspective and flood risk management of the Jingjiang Flood Diversion District in the Yangtze River Basin. J Nat Disasters 15(5):19鈥?7 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  40. Su MR, Yang ZF, Chen B (2009) Set pair analysis for urban ecosystem health assessment. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 14:1773鈥?780 CrossRef
  41. Su SL, Chen X, Stephen DD et al (2010) Integrative fuzzy set pair model for land ecological security assessment: a case study of Xiaolangdi Reservoir Region, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24:639鈥?47. doi:10.1007/s00477-009-0351-x CrossRef
  42. Su SL, Li D, Yu X et al (2011) Assessing land ecological security in Shanghai (China) based on catastrophe theory. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25(6):737鈥?46. doi:10.1007/s00477-011-0457-9 CrossRef
  43. Tang M, Shao DG, Yao CL et al (2009) Improved catastrophe theory based evaluation method and its application to drought disaster risk evaluation. J Hydraul Eng 40(7):857鈥?62 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  44. Tesfamariam S, Sadiq R (2006) Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP). Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21:35鈥?0. doi:10.1007/s00477-006-0042-9 CrossRef
  45. Tong ZJ, Zhang JQ, Liu XP (2009) GIS-based risk assessment of grassland fire disaster in western Jilin Province, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23:463鈥?71 CrossRef
  46. United Nations, Department of Humanitarian Affairs (1991) Mitigating natural disasters: phenomena, effects and options鈥攁 manual for policy makers and planners. United Nations, New York
  47. United Nations, Department of Humanitarian Affairs (1992) Internationally agreed glossary of basic terms related to disaster management, DNA/93/36. Geneva
  48. Vose D (2008) Risk analysis: a quantitative guide. Wiley, Chichester
  49. Wang XY, Zhang X, Lai GW (2004) Over-standard integrated risk analysis of flood control system. J Hydraul Eng 2:83鈥?7 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  50. Wang D, Pan SM, Wu JC et al (2006) Review of risk analysis on flood. J Nat Disasters 15(1):103鈥?09 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  51. Wang YM, Luo Y, Hua ZS (2008) On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. Eur J Oper Res 186:735鈥?47 CrossRef
  52. Wang WS, Jin JL, Ding J et al (2009a) A new approach to water resources system assessment鈥攕et pair analysis method. Sci China E 52(10):3017鈥?023. doi:10.1007/s11431-009-0099-z CrossRef
  53. Wang MW, Li L, Jin JL (2009b) An improved set pair analysis model for evaluation of dangerous degree of debris flow. J Nat Disasters 18(6):124鈥?28 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  54. Wang FQ, Han FP, Wang DX et al (2009b) Set pair analysis-variable fuzzy set model for evaluation of regional water resources shortage risk. Water Resour Power 27(4):31鈥?3, 265 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  55. Wang ZS, Jin JL, Wei YM (2010) Connection number based risk evaluation method for watershed flood control engineering system using stochastic simulation and triangular fuzzy numbers. J Hydraul Eng 41(10):1173鈥?178 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  56. Wang YM, Li ZW, Tang ZH et al (2011) A GIS-based spatial multi-criteria approach for flood risk assessment in the Dongting Lake Region, Hunan, Central China. Water Resour Manag 25:3465鈥?484. doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9866-2 CrossRef
  57. Wei YM, Jin JL, Yang CJ et al (2007) Theory of risk management of flood disaster. Science Press of China, Beijing (in Chinese)
  58. Wen SY, Zhao DZ, Zhang FS et al (2009) Risk assessment method of harmful algal bloom hazard. J Nat Disasters 18(1):106鈥?11 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  59. World Meteorological Organization (1999) Comprehensive risk assessment for natural hazards. WMO/TD No 955, Geneva
  60. Wu KY, Jin JL, Zhou YL et al (2008) Set pair analysis based variable fuzzy set assessment model for watershed water resources security. J Sichuan Univ 40(3):6鈥?2 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  61. Xia FQ, Kang XW, Wu SH et al (2008) Research on dike breach risk of the hanging reach under different flood conditions in the Lower Yellow River. Geogr Res 27(1):229鈥?39 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  62. Xie T, Zhou JZ, Song LX et al (2011) Dynamic evaluation and implementation of flood loss based on GIS grid data. Commun Comput Inf Sci 228:558鈥?65. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23223-7_72 CrossRef
  63. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338鈥?53 CrossRef
  64. Zhang JQ, Zhou CH, Xu KQ et al (2002) Flood disaster monitoring and evaluation in China. Environ Hazards 4:33鈥?3 CrossRef
  65. Zhang D, Wang GL, Zhou HC (2011) Assessment on agricultural drought risk based on variable fuzzy sets model. Chin Geogr Sci 21(2):167鈥?75. doi:10.1007/s11769-011-0456-2 CrossRef
  66. Zhao KQ (1989) Set pair and set pair analysis鈥攁 new concept and systematic analysis method. In: Proceedings of the national conference on system theory and regional planning, pp 87鈥?1 (in Chinese)
  67. Zhao KQ (1994) Set pair analysis and its preliminary application. Explor Nat 13(1):67鈥?2 (in Chinese)
  68. Zhao KQ (2000) Set pair analysis and its preliminary applications. Science and Technology Press of Zhejiang, Hangzhou (in Chinese)
  69. Zhou CH, Wan Q, Huang SF et al (2000) A GIS-based approach to flood risk Zonation. Acta Geogr Sin 55(1):15鈥?4 (in Chinese with English abstract)
  
• 作者单位：Qiang Zou (1)
  Jianzhong Zhou (1)
  Chao Zhou (2)
  Lixiang Song (1)
  Jun Guo (1)
  
  1. School of Hydropower and Information Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, People鈥檚 Republic of China
  2. Department of Control Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, People鈥檚 Republic of China
  
• ISSN：1436-3259

文摘

On the basis of the disaster system theory and comprehensive analysis of flood risk factors, including the hazard of the disaster-inducing factors and disaster-breeding environment, as well as the vulnerability of the hazards-bearing bodies, the primary risk assessment index system of flood diversion district as well as its assessment standards were established. Then, a new model for comprehensive flood risk assessment was put forward in this paper based on set pair analysis (SPA) and variable fuzzy sets (VFS) theory, named set pair analysis-variable fuzzy sets model (SPA-VFS), which determines the relative membership degree function of VFS by using SPA method and has the advantages of intuitionist course, simple calculation and good generality application. Moreover, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was combined with trapezoidal fuzzy numbers to calculate the weights of assessment indices, thus the weights for flood hazard and flood vulnerability were determined by the fuzzy AHP procedure, respectively. Then SPA-VFS were applied to calculate the flood hazard grades and flood vulnerability grades with rank feature value equation and the confidence criterion, respectively. Under the natural disasters risk expression recommended by the Humanitarian Affairs Department of United Nations, flood risk grades were achieved from the flood hazard grades and flood vulnerability grades with risk grade classification matrix, where flood hazard, flood vulnerability and flood risk were all classified into five grades as very low, low, medium, high and very high. Consequently, integrated flood risk maps could be carried out for flood risk management and decision-making. Finally, SPA-VFS and fuzzy AHP were employed for comprehensive flood risk assessment of Jingjiang flood diversion district in China, and the computational results demonstrate that SPA-VFS is reasonable, reliable and applicable, thus has bright prospects of application for comprehensive flood risk assessment, and moreover has potential to be applicable to comprehensive risk assessment of other natural disasters with no much modification.