Contested multilateralism

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Julia C. Morse (1)
  Robert O. Keohane (1)
  
• 关键词：International institutions ; Multilateralism ; Institutional change ; Regime shifting ; Regime complex
• 刊名：The Review of International Organizations
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：December 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：9
• 期：4
• 页码：385-412
• 全文大小：487 KB
• 参考文献：1. Alter, K., & Meunier, S. (2009). The politics of international regime complexity. / Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 13-4. CrossRef
  2. Bartsch, S. (2007). The global fund to fight AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. In / Global health governance and the fight against HIV/AIDS. Palgrave Macmillan.
  3. Betts, A. (2009). Institutional proliferation and the global refugee regime. / Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 53-8. CrossRef
  4. Boese, W. (2003). The proliferation security initiative: an interview with John Bolton. / Arms control today. http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2003_12/PSI. Accessed 12 December 2013.
  5. Bolton, M., & Nash, T. (2010). The role of middle power-NGO coalitions in global policy: the case of the cluster munitions ban. / Global Policy, 1, (2), May 2010.
  6. Bot, Y. (2013). Opinion of advocate General Bot: European Commission, Council of the European Union, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs. Yassin Abdullah Kadi. 19 March. Case-law of the Court of Justice (Joined Cases C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P and C-595/10 P). Available at: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=135223&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=1765372. Accessed 23 August 2013.
  7. Byers, M. (2004). Policing the high seas: the proliferation security initiative. / The American Journal of International Law, 98(3), 526-45. CrossRef
  8. Carus, W. S. (2012). Defining “Weapons of mass destruction- / Center for the study of weapons of mass destruction, occasional paper no. 8. Washington, DC: NDU. Available at: http://www.ndu.edu/press/lib/pdf/CSWMD-OccasionalPapers/CSWMD_OccationalPaper-8.pdf. Accessed 11 February 2014.
  9. Colgan, J. D. (2009). / The international energy agency: Challenges for the 21st century. Berlin: Global Public Policy Institute. GPPi Policy Paper Series No. 6.
  10. Colgan, J. D., Keohane, R. O., & Van de Graaf, T. (2012). Punctuated equilibrium in the energy regime complex. / The Review of International Organizations, 7(2), 117-43. CrossRef
  11. Cortright, D., & Lopez, G. (Eds.). (2002). / Smart sanctions: Targeting economic statecraft. USA: Rowman & Littlefield.
  12. Cramer, P. (2003). Recent Swedish experiences with targeted UN sanctions: the erosion of trust in the Security Council. In E. de Wet, A. Nollkaemper & P. Dijkstra (Eds.). / Review of the Security Council by member states. Antwerp: Intersentia.
  13. Downs, G. W., Rocke, D. M., & Barsoom, P. (1998). Managing the Evolution of Multilateralism. / International Organization, 52(2), 397-17.
  14. Finnemore, M. (1996). / National interests in international society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  15. Ginsborg, L., & Scheinin, M. (2011). You can’t always get what you want: the Kadi II conundrum and the security council 1267 terrorist sanctions regime. / Essex Human Rights Review, 8, 7-9.
  16. Goldstein, J., & Keohane, R. O. (1993). / Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  17. Goose, S., & Williams, J. (2006). The campaign to ban antipersonnel landmines. In R. A. Matthew, B. McDonald, & K. R. Rutherford (Eds.), / Landmines and human security: International politics and war’s hidden legacy. New York: SUNY Press.
  18. Gruber, L. (2000). / Ruling the world: Power politics and the rise of international institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  19. Harman, S. (2012). / Global health governance. Global institutions, vol. 60. New York: Routledge.
  20. Helfer, L. R. (2004). Regime shifting: the TRIPs agreement and new dynamics of international intellectual property lawmaking. / The Yale Journal of International Law, 29, 1-81.
  21. Helfer, L. R. (2005). Exiting Treaties. / Virginia Law Review, 91, 1579-648.
  22. Helfer, L. R. (2009). Regime shifting in the international intellectual property system. / Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 39-4. CrossRef
  23. Helfer, L., & Austin, G. W. (2011)
• 作者单位：Julia C. Morse (1)
  Robert O. Keohane (1)
  
  1. Princeton University, Robertson Hall, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA
  
• ISSN：1559-744X

文摘

“Contested multilateralism-describes the situation that results from the pursuit of strategies by states, multilateral organizations, and non-state actors to use multilateral institutions, existing or newly created, to challenge the rules, practices, or missions of existing multilateral institutions. It occurs when coalitions dissatisfied with existing institutions combine threats of exit, voice, and the creation of alternative institutions to pursue policies and practices different from those of existing institutions. Contested multilateralism takes two principal forms: regime shifting and competitive regime creation. It can be observed across issue areas. It shapes patterns of international cooperation and discord on key security concerns such as combating terrorist financing, halting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and banning certain conventional weapons. It is also evident on economic issues involving intellectual property, on environmental and energy issues, and in the realm of global public health. The sources of dissatisfaction are primarily exogenous, and the institutions used to challenge the status quo range from traditional treaties or intergovernmental organizations to informal networks, some of which include non-state actors. Some institutions are winners from the process of contested multilateralism; others may lose authority or status. Although we do not propose an explanatory theory of contested multilateralism, we do suggest that this concept provides a useful framework for understanding changes in regime complexes and the strategies that generate such changes.