Sensory exploitation and cultural transmission: the late emergence of iconic representations in human evolution

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jan Verpooten (1) (2)
  Mark Nelissen (1)
  
• 关键词：Sensory exploitation ; Cultural transmission ; Iconic representations ; Mimicry ; Demographic transition ; Evolution of art
• 刊名：Theory in Biosciences
• 出版年：2010
• 出版时间：September 2010
• 年：2010
• 卷：129
• 期：2-3
• 页码：211-221
• 全文大小：282KB
• 参考文献：1. Ambrose SH (1998a) Chronology of the Later Stone Age and food production in East Africa. J Archaeol Sci 25:377-92 CrossRef
  2. Ambrose SH (1998b) Late Pleistocene human population bottlenecks, volcanic winter, and differentiation of modern humans. J Hum Evol 34:623-51 CrossRef
  3. Arak A, Enquist M (1993) Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals. Phil Trans R Soc B 340:207-13 CrossRef
  4. Arnqvist G (2006) Sensory exploitation and sexual conflict. Phil Trans R Soc B 361:375-86. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1790 CrossRef
  5. Bar-Yosef O (2002) The Upper Paleolithic revolution. Annu Rev Anthropol 31:363-93 CrossRef
  6. Bednarik RG (2003) A figurine from the African Acheulian. Curr Anthropol 44(3):405-13 CrossRef
  7. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  8. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (2005) The origin and evolution of cultures. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  9. Brumm A, Moore MW (2005) Symbolic revolutions and the Australian archaeological record. Camb Archaeol J 15:157-75. doi:10.1017/S0959774305000089 CrossRef
  10. Coe K (2003) The ancestress hypothesis: visual art as adaptation. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick
  11. Conard NJ (2003) Palaeolithic ivory sculptures from South-Western Germany and the origins of figurative art. Nature 426:830-32 CrossRef
  12. Conard NJ (2009) A female figurine from the basal Aurignacian of Hohle Fels Cave in southwestern Germany. Nature 459:248-52. doi:10.1038/nature07995 CrossRef
  13. Dart RA (1974) The waterworn pebble of many faces from Makapansgat. S Afr J Sci 70:167-69
  14. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex, 2 vols. John Murray, London (Reprinted in 1952 by Encyclopedia Britannica)
  15. Debeaune SA, White R (1993) Ice-age lamps. Sci Am 268:108-13 CrossRef
  16. Delporte H (1977) Paleolithic lamp found at cave-of-Lascaux. Rev Louvre mus Fr 27:94-6
  17. Dissanayake E (1992) Homo sestheticus. Where art comes from and why. University of Washington Press, Seattle
  18. Dissanayake E (2001) Birth of the arts. Nat Hist 109:84-1
  19. Endler JA, Basolo AL (1998) Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 13:415-20 CrossRef
  20. Floss H, Rouquerol N (2007) Les Chemins de l’Art Aurignacien en Europe/Das Aurignacien und die Anf?nge der Kunst in Europa. éditions Musée-forum Aurignac, Aurignac
  21. Fuller RC, Houle D, Travis J (2005) Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences. Am Nat 166:437-46 CrossRef
  22. Goren-Inbar N (1986) A figurine from the Acheulean site of Berekhat Ram. J Isr Prehist Soc 19:7-2
  23. Guilford T, Dawkins MS (1991) Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Anim Behav 42:1-4 CrossRef
  24. Henrich J (2004) Demography and cultural evolution: how adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses—the Tasmanian case. Am Antiq 69:197-14 CrossRef
  25. Hodgson D (2006) Understanding the origins of Paleoart: the neurovisual resonance theory and brain functioning. Paleoanthropology 2006:54-7
  26. Huffman MA, Quiatt D (1986) Stone handling by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata): implications for tool use of stone. Primates 27:413-23 CrossRef
  27. James HVA, Petraglia MD (2005) Interpreting conflict in the ancient Andes. Curr Anthropol 46(Suppl):3. doi:10.1086/425660 CrossRef
  28. Kellert SR, Wilson EO (1993) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington
  29. Klein R (2000) Archaeology and the evolution of human behavior. Evol Anthropol 9:17-6 CrossRef
  30. Kohn M, Mithen S (1999) Handaxes: products of sexual selection? Antiquity 73:518-26
  31. Kokko H, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Morley J (2003) The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:653-64 CrossRef
  32. Maran T (2007) Semiotic interpretations of biological mimicry. Semiotica 167:223-48. doi:10.1515/SEM.2007.077 CrossRef
  33. Marean CW et al (2007) Early human use of marine resources and pigment in South Africa during the Middle Pleistocene. Nature 449:905-08. doi:10.1038/nature06204 CrossRef
  34. McBrearty S, Brooks AS (2000) The revolution that wasn’t: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. J Hum Evol 39:453-63 CrossRef
  35. McDermott L (1996) Self-representation in upper paleolithic female figurines. Curr Anthropol 37:227-75 CrossRef
  36. Mellars P (2005) The impossible coincidence. A single-species model for the origins of modern human behavior in Europe. Evol Anthropol 14:12-7 CrossRef
  37. Miller GF (1998) How mate choice shaped human nature: a review of sexual selection and human evolution. In: Crawford C, Krebs D (eds) Handbook of evolutionary psychology: ideas, issues, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 87-29
  38. Miller GF (1999) Sexual selection for cultural displays. In: Dunbar R, Knight C, Power C (eds) The evolution of culture. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 71-1
  39. Miller GF (2000) The mating mind. Heinemann, London
  40. Miller GF (2001) Aesthetic fitness: how sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bull Psychol Arts 2(1):20-5
  41. Mithen SJ (1996) The prehistory of the mind: a search for the origins of art, religion, and science. Thames and Hudson, London
  42. O’Connell JF, Allen J (2007) Pre-LGM Sahul (Pleistocene Australia-New Guinea) and the archaeology of early modern humans. In: Mellars P, Boyle K, Bar-Yosef O, Stringer C (eds) Rethinking the human revolution. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, pp 395-10
  43. Pasteur G (1982) A classificatory review of mimicry systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:169-99 CrossRef
  44. Petraglia MD (2007) Mind the gap: factoring the Arabian Peninsula and the Indian subcontinent into out of Africa models. In: Mellars P, Boyle K, Bar-Yosef O, Stringer C (eds) Rethinking the human revolution. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, pp 383-94
  45. Pinker S (1997) How the mind works. Norton, New York
  46. Pinker S (2002) The blank slate. The modern denial of human nature. Viking, New York
  47. Powell A, Shennan S, Thomas MG (2009) Late pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science 324:1298-301. doi:10.1126/science.1170165 CrossRef
  48. Power C (1999) ‘Beauty-magic: the origins of art. In: Dunbar R, Knight C, Power C (eds) The evolution of culture. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 71-1
  49. Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W (1999) The science of art: a neurological theory of aesthetic experience. J Conscious Stud 6:15-1
  50. Ribeiro PD, Christy JH, Rissanen RJ, Kim TW (2006) Males are attracted by their own courtship signals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:81-9 CrossRef
  51. Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2001) Built for speed, not for comfort. Darwinian theory and human culture. Hist Philos Life Sci 23:425-65
  52. Ross J, Davidson I (2006) Rock art and ritual: an archaeological analysis of rock art in arid central Australia. J Archaeol Method Theory 13:305-41. doi:10.1007/s10816-006-9021-1 CrossRef
  53. Ryan MJ (1998) Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. Science 281:1999-003 (review 1999) CrossRef
  54. Salzburger W, Braasch I, Meyer A (2007) Adaptive sequence evolution in a color gene involved in the formation of the characteristic egg-dummies of male haplochromine cichlid fishes. BMC Biol 5:51
  55. Sebeok TA (1989) Iconicity. In: Sebeok TA (ed) The sign and its masters. University Press of America, Lanham, pp 107-27
  56. Sebeok TA, Danesi M (2000) The forms of meaning: modeling systems theory and semiotic analysis. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York
  57. Sergent J, Ohta S, MacDonald B (1992) Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. Brain 115:15-6 CrossRef
  58. Shennan S (2001) Demography and cultural innovation: a model and its implication for the emergence of modern human culture. Camb Archeol J 11:5-6
  59. Stiner MC, Kuhn SL (2006) Changes in the ‘Connectedness-and resilience of Paleolithic societies in Mediterranean ecosystems. Hum Ecol 34:693-12 CrossRef
  60. ten Cate C, Rowe C (2007) Biases in signal evolution: learning makes a difference. Trends Ecol Evol 22:380-87. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.03.006 CrossRef
  61. Tobler M (2006) Die Eiflecken bei Cichliden: Evolution durch Nutzung der Sinne? (The egg spots of cichlids: evolution through sensory exploitation?) Z Fisch 8:39-6
  62. Tsao DY, Livingstone MS (2008) Mechanisms of face perception. Annu Rev Neurosci 31:411-37. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094238 CrossRef
  63. Ulrich RS (1993) Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In: Kellert RS, Wilson EO (eds) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, pp 73-37
  64. Van Damme W (2008) Introducing world art studies. In: Van Damme W, Zijlmans K (eds) World art studies: exploring concepts and approaches. Valiz, Amsterdam, pp 23-1
  65. van Schaik CP, Knott CD (2001) Geographic variation in tool use on Neesia fruits in orangutans. Am J Phys Anthropol 114:331-42 CrossRef
  66. Verpooten J, Nelissen M (2010) Sensory exploitation: underestimated in the evolution of art as once in sexual selection? In: Plaisance KS, Reydon TAC (eds) Philosophy of behavioral biology, volume: Boston studies in the philosophy of science. Springer
  67. Vogelsang R (1998) Middle-Stone-Age-Fundstellen in Südwest-Namibia. Heinrich Barth Institut, K?ln
  68. Wachtel E (1993) The first picture show: cinematic aspects of cave art. Leonardo 26:135-40 CrossRef
  69. White R (1982) Rethinking the middle/upper paleolithic transition (and comments and replies). Curr Anthropol 23:169-92 CrossRef
  70. Wilson EO (1984) Biophilia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
  
• 作者单位：Jan Verpooten (1) (2)
  Mark Nelissen (1)
  
  1. Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, CGB -Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020, Antwerpen, Belgium
  2. Konrad Lorenz Institute for Cognition and Evolution Research, Adolf Lorenz Gasse 2, 3422, Altenberg, Austria
  

文摘

Iconic representations (i.e., figurative imagery and realistic art) only started to appear consistently some 45,000 years ago, although humans have been anatomically modern since 200,000-60,000 years ago. What explains this? Some authors have suggested a neurocognitive change took place, leading to a creative explosion, although this has been contested. Here, we examine the hypothesis that demographic changes caused cultural “cumulative adaptive evolution-and as such the emergence of modern symbolic behavior. This approach usefully explains the evolution of utilitarian skills and tools, and the creation of symbols to identify groups. However, it does not equally effectively explain the evolution of behaviors that may not be directly adaptive, such as the production of iconic representations like figurines and rock art. In order to shed light on their emergence, we propose to combine the above-mentioned cultural hypothesis with the concept of sensory exploitation. The concept essentially states that behavioral traits (in this case iconic art production) which exploit pre-existing sensory sensitivities will evolve if not hindered by costs (i.e., natural selection). In this view, iconic art traditions are evolved by piggybacking on cumulative adaptive evolution. Since it is to date uncertain whether art has served any adaptive function in human evolution, parsimony demands paying more attention to the primary and afunctional mechanism of sensory exploitation as opposed to mechanisms of models based exclusively on secondary benefits (such as Miller’s, for instance, in which art is proposed to evolve as a sexual display of fitness).