Performance of a hybrid anaerobic-contact oxidation biofilm baffled reactor for the treatment of decentralized molasses wastewater

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Minmin Liu (1) (2)
  Ying Zhao (2)
  Beidou Xi (2)
  Li’an Hou (1)
  Xunfeng Xia (2)
  
• 关键词：anaerobic baffled reactor ; combination filler ; contact oxidation biofilm ; food wastewater
• 刊名：Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：August 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：8
• 期：4
• 页码：598-606
• 全文大小：
• 参考文献：1. Zhu G F, Li J Z, Wu P, Jin H Z, Wang Z. The performance and phase separated characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor treating soybean protein processing wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(17): 8027-033 CrossRef
  2. Barber W P, Stuckey D C. The use of the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for wastewater treatment: a review. Water Research, 1999, 33(7): 1559-578 CrossRef
  3. Setiadi T, Husaini, Djajadiningrat A. Palm oil mill effluent treatment by anaerobic baffled reactors: recycle effects and biokinetic parameters. Water Science and Technology, 1996, 34(11): 59-6 CrossRef
  4. Grover R, Marwaha S S, Kennedy J F. Studies on the use of anaerobic baffled reactor for the continuous anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mill black liquors. Process Biochemistry (Barking, London, England), 1999, 34(6-): 653-57 CrossRef
  5. Welander U, Henrysson T, Welander T. Biological nitrogen removal from municipal landfill leachate in a pilot scale suspended carrier biofilm process. Water Research, 1998, 32(5): 1564-570 CrossRef
  6. Ramaraj Boopathy. Biological treatment of swine waste using anaerobic baffled reactors. Bioresource Technology, 1998, 64(1): 1- CrossRef
  7. Akunna J C, Clark M. Performance of a granular-bed anaerobic baffled reactor (GRABBR) treating whisky distillery wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 2000, 74(3): 257-61 CrossRef
  8. Vossoughi M, Shakeri M, Alemzadeh I. Performance of anaerobic baffled reactor treating synthetic wastewater influenced by decreasing COD/SO₄ ratios. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intersification, 2003, 42(10): 811-16 CrossRef
  9. Bodík I, Kratochvíl K, Gaspariková E, Hutnan M. Nitrogen removal in an anaerobic baffled filter reactor with aerobic post-treatment. Bioresource Technology, 2003, 86(1): 79-4 CrossRef
  10. Nachaiyasit S, Stuckey D C. The effect of shock loads on the performance of an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). 1. Step changes in feed concentration at constant retention time. Water Research, 1997, 31(11): 2737-746 CrossRef
  11. Wang J, Huang Y, Zhao X. Performance and characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor. Bioresource Technology, 2004, 93(2): 205-08 CrossRef
  12. Maya-Altamira L, Baun A, Angelidaki I, Schmidt J E. Influence of wastewater characteristics on methane potential in food-processing industry wastewaters. Water Research, 2008, 42(8): 2195-203 CrossRef
  13. Entürk E S, Ince M, Onkal-Engin G. Treatment efficiency and VFA composition of a thermophilic anaerobic contact reactor treating food industry wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 176(1): 843-48 CrossRef
  14. Abbott M S R., Harvey A P, Perez, Valente G. Biological processing in oscillatory baffled reactors: operation, advantages and potential. Interface Focus, 2013, 3(1): 32-6
  15. Thanwised P, Wirojanagud W, Reung S. Effect of hydraulic retention time on hydrogen production and chemical oxygen demand removal from tapioca wastewater using anaerobic mixed cultures in anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(20): 15503-5510 CrossRef
  16. Kimura Y, Isaka K, Kazama F. Effects of inorganic carbon limitation on anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) activity. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(6): 4390-394 CrossRef
  17. Ayaz-Selma C, Akca L, Aktas O. Pilot-scale anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater in upflow anaerobic sludge bed and anaerobic baffled reactors at ambient temperatures. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2012, 46(1-): 60-7 CrossRef
  18. Tawfik A, El-Qelish M. Continuous hydrogen production from co-digestion of municipal food waste and kitchen wastewater in mesophilic anaerobic baffled reactor. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 114: 270-74 CrossRef
  19. Ji G D, Sun T H, Ni J R. Anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for treating heavy oil produced water with high concentrations of salt and poor nutrient. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(3): 1108-114 CrossRef
  20. Barber WP, Stuckey D C. Nitrogen removal in a modified anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR): 2, nitrification. Water Research, 2000, 34(9): 2423-432 CrossRef
  21. Kim Y M, Park D, Lee D S. Sudden failure of biological nitrogen and carbon removal in the full-scale pre-denitrification process treating cokes wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(19): 4340-347 CrossRef
  22. Hadjivassilis I, Gajdos S, Vanco D. Treatment of wastewater from the potato chips and snacks manufacturing industry. Water Science and Technology, 1997, 36(2-): 329-35 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Minmin Liu (1) (2)
  Ying Zhao (2)
  Beidou Xi (2)
  Li’an Hou (1)
  Xunfeng Xia (2)
  
  1. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
  2. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China
  
• ISSN：2095-221X

文摘

A novel hybrid anaerobic-contact oxidation biofilm baffled reactor (HAOBR) was developed to simultaneously remove nitrogenous and carbonaceous organic pollutants from decentralized molasses wastewater in the study. The study was based on the inoculation of anaerobic granule sludge in anaerobic compartments and the installation of combination filler in aerobic compartments. The performance of reactor system was studied regarding the hydraulic retention time (HRT), microbial characteristics and the gas water ratio (GWR). When the HRT was 24h and the GWR was 20:1, total ammonia and chemical oxygen demand (COD) of the effluent were reduced by 99% and 91.8%, respectively. The reactor performed stably for treating decentralized molasses wastewater. The good performance of the reactor can be attributed to the high resistance of COD and hydraulic shock loads. In addition, the high solid retention time of contact oxidation biofilm contributed to stable performance of the reactor.