Numerical study on viscosity reduction in mining heavy oil by circulating hot water

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Weixiu Shi (11776) (21776)
  Weiyi Li (11776)
  Lisheng Pan (11776)
  
• 关键词：computational fluid dynamics (CFD) ; heavy oil ; viscosity reduction ; drag reduction
• 刊名：Transactions of Tianjin University
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：April 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：19
• 期：2
• 页码：103-109
• 全文大小：854KB
• 参考文献：1. He Shenghou, Zhang Qi. / Gas Exploit Engineering[M]. China Petrochemical Press, Beijing, 2003 (in Chinese).
  2. Qu Zhanqing, Xing Jianhua, Zhang Hongling / et al. Lifting method study on dilute oil with heavy oil[J]. / Oil and Gas Harvest Technology, 2000(9): 26-8 (in Chinese).
  3. Van-Engelen G P, Kaul C L, Vos B / et al. Study of flow improvers for transportation of Bombay high crude oil through submarine pipelines[J]. / Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1981, 36(10): 2539-544.
  4. Wardhaugh L T, Boger D V. Flow characteristics of pipeline design[J]. / AIChE Journal, 1991, 37(6): 871-85. CrossRef
  5. Xu S P, Song Z Z. Rheological properties evaluation of Shengli crude oil under the condition of adding pour point depressant[J]. / Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2007, 31(6): 107-11 (in Chinese).
  6. Liang W J. / Petrochemistry[M]. Petroleum University Press, Dongying, 1995 (in Chinese).
  7. Luo T H. Study and development on waxy crude oil rheology[ J]. / Oil Storage and Transportation, 1989, 8(3): 1- (in Chinese) CrossRef
  8. Al-Roomi Y, George R, Elgibaly A / et al. Use of a novel surfactant for improving the transportability / transportation of heavy / viscous crude oils[J]. / Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 2004, 42(2-): 235-43. CrossRef
  9. Hardy W A, Sit S P, Stockwell A. Heavy-oil-emulsion pipeline tests meet targets[J]. / The Oil and Gas Journal, 1989, 87(10): 39-3.
  10. Shigemoto N, Al-Maamari R S, Jibril B Y / et al. Effect of water content and surfactant type on viscosity and stability of emulsified heavy Mukhaizna crude oil[J]. / Energy Fuels, 2007, 21(2): 1014-018. CrossRef
  11. Storm D A, McKeon R J, Mc-Kinzie H L / et al. Drag reduction in heavy oil[J]. / Journal of Energy Resource Technology, 1999, 121(3): 145-48. CrossRef
  12. Arney M S, Ribeiro G S, Guevara E / et al. Cement-lined pipes for water lubricated transport of heavy oil[J]. / International Journal Multiphase Flow, 1996, 22(2): 207-21. CrossRef
  13. Ovalles C, Filgueiras E, Morales A / et al. Use of a dispersed iron catalyst for upgrading extra-heavy crude oil using methane as source of hydrogen[J]. / Fuel, 2003, 82(8): 887-92. CrossRef
  14. Weissman J G, Kessler R V, Sawicki R A / et al. Down-hole catalytic upgrading of heavy crude oil[J]. / Energy Fuels, 1996, 10(4): 883-89. CrossRef
  15. Wang F J. / Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis: CFD Principles and Applications[M]. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, 2004 (in Chinese).
  
• 作者单位：Weixiu Shi (11776) (21776)
  Weiyi Li (11776)
  Lisheng Pan (11776)
  
  11776. School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China
  21776. School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing, 100044, China
  
• ISSN：1995-8196

文摘

Viscosity reduction is an important process in mining heavy oil. To predict the temperature variation and viscosity variation of heavy oil in flow direction, computational fluid dynamics(CFD) was adopted to simulate the process of heat transfer and flow in this paper. Moreover, an objective function, namely viscosity reduction efficiency, was established to analyze the effect of viscosity reduction. The results indicate that circulating hot water can reduce viscosity significantly, and that the effect of viscosity reduction depends on the inlet temperature and inlet volumetric flow rate of hot water. There is a maximum temperature of heavy oil in flow direction. With the inlet volumetric flow rate of 2.0 m3/h and the inlet temperatures of 60,°C, 70,°C and 80,°C, viscosity reduction efficiencies are 94.6%, 96.7% and 97.3%, respectively. With the inlet temperature of 70,°C and the volumetric flow rates of 1.5 m3/h, 2.0 m3/h and 2.5 m3/h, viscosity reduction efficiencies are 94.4%, 96.7% and 97.2%, respectively.