Swine Manure-Based Pilot-Scale Algal Biomass Production System for Fuel Production and Wastewater Treatment—a Case Study

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Min Min (1)
  Bing Hu (1)
  Michael J. Mohr (1)
  Aimin Shi (1)
  Jinfeng Ding (1)
  Yong Sun (1)
  Yongcheng Jiang (1)
  Zongqiang Fu (1)
  Richard Griffith (1)
  Fida Hussain (1)
  Dongyan Mu (1)
  Yong Nie (1)
  Paul Chen (1)
  Wenguang Zhou (1)
  Roger Ruan (1)
  
• 关键词：Algal biofuel production system ; Swine manure ; Nutrient removal rate ; Pilot scale
• 刊名：Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：February 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：172
• 期：3
• 页码：1390-1406
• 全文大小：644 KB
• 参考文献：1. Aneja, V. P., Nelson, D. R., Roelle, P. A., Walker, J. T., & Battye, W. (2003). Agricultural ammonia emissions and ammonium concentrations associated with aerosols and precipitation in the southeast United States. / Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 108(D4), 1984-012. CrossRef
  2. Westerman, P. W., Huffman, R. L., & Feng, J. S. (1995). Swine-lagoon seepage in sandy soil. / Transactions of the ASAE, 38(6), 1749-760. CrossRef
  3. Stone, K. C., Hunt, P. G., Coffey, S. W., & Matheny, T. A. (1995). Water quality status of a USDA water quality demonstration project in the Eastern Coastal Plain. / Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 50(5), 567-71.
  4. Asano, T., Burton, F. L., Leverenz, H. L., Tsuchihashi, R., & Tchobanoglous, G. (2007). / Water reuse, issues, technologies, and applications (p. 1570). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  5. Kebede-Westhead, E., Pizarro, C., & Mulbry, W. W. (2006). Treatment of swine manure effluent using freshwater algae: production, nutrient recovery, and elemental composition of algal biomass at four effluent loading rates. / Journal of Applied Phycology, 18(1), 41-6. CrossRef
  6. Godos, I. D., Blanco, S., García-Encina, P. A., Becares, E., & Mu?oz, R. (2009). Long-term operation of high rate algal ponds for the bioremediation of piggery wastewaters at high loading rates. / Bioresource Technology, 100(19), 4332-339. CrossRef
  7. Sevrin-Reyssac, J. (1998). Biotreatment of swine manure by production of aquatic valuable biomasses. / Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 68(3), 177-86. CrossRef
  8. Zhou, W., Hu, B., Li, Y., Min, M., Mohr, M., Du, Z., & Ruan, R. (2012). Mass cultivation of microalgae on animal wastewater: a sequential two-stage cultivation process for energy crop and omega-3-rich animal feed production. / Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 168(2), 348-63. CrossRef
  9. Hu, B., Min, M., Zhou, W., Du, Z., Mohr, M., Chen, P., & Ruan, R. (2012). Enhanced mixotrophic growth of microalga / Chlorella sp. on pretreated swine manure for simultaneous biofuel feedstock production and nutrient removal. / Bioresource Technology, 126, 71-9. CrossRef
  10. Li, Y., Zhou, W., Hu, B., Min, M., Chen, P., & Ruan, R. R. (2011). Integration of algae cultivation as biodiesel production feedstock with municipal wastewater treatment: strains screening and significance evaluation of environmental factors. / Bioresource Technology, 102(23), 10861-0867. CrossRef
  11. Hach Inc. (2008). / DR5000 spectrophotometer procedures manual (2nd ed.). Loveland: Hach Company.
  12. APHA. (1998). / Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington: American Public Health Association.
  13. Chen, S., Liao, W., Liu, C., Wen, Z., Kincaid, R. L., Harrison, J. H., & Stevens, D. J. (2003). / Value-added chemicals from animal manure (no. PNNL-14495). Richland: Pacific Northwest National Lab. Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory. CrossRef
  14. Kim, T. H., Kim, J. S., Sunwoo, C., & Lee, Y. Y. (2003). Pretreatment of corn stover by aqueous ammonia. / Bioresource Technology, 90(1), 39-7. CrossRef
  15. Ikada, Y., Suzuki, M., & Tamada, Y. (1985). / Polymer surfaces possessing minimal interaction with blood components (In polymers as biomaterials, pp. 135-47). New York: Springer.
  16. Hallab, N. J., Bundy, K. J., O’Connor, K., Moses, R. L., & Jacobs, J. J. (2001). Evaluation of metallic and polymeric biomaterial surface energy and surface roughness characteristics for directed cell adhesion. / Tissue Engineering, 7(1), 55-1. CrossRef
  17. Min, M., Hu, B., Zhou, W., Li, Y., Chen, P., & Ruan, R. (2012). Mutual influence of light and CO₂ on carbon sequestration via cultivating mixotrophic alga / Auxenochlorella protothecoides UMN280 in an organic carbon-rich wastewater. / Journal of Applied Phycology, 24(5), 1099-105. CrossRef
  18. Bilanovic, D., Shelef, G., & Sukenik, A. (1988). Flocculation of microalgae with cationic polymers—effects of medium salinity. / Biomass, 17(1), 65-6. CrossRef
  19. Montagnes, D. J., Kimmance, S. A., & Atkinson, D. (2003). Using Q10: can growth rates increase linearly with temperature? / Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 32(3), 307-13. CrossRef
  20. Sorokin, C., & Krauss, R. W. (1962). Effects of temperature & illuminance on chlorella growth uncoupled from cell division. / Plant Physiology, 37(1), 37. CrossRef
  21. Choi, J. W., & Peters, F. (1992). Effects of temperature on two psychrophilic ecotypes of a heterotrophic nanoflagellate, / Paraphysomonas imperforata. / Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 58(2), 593-99.
  22. Mulbry, W., Kondrad, S., Pizarro, C., & Kebede-Westhead, E. (2008). Treatment of dairy manure effluent using freshwater algae: algal productivity and recovery of manure nutrients using pilot-scale algal turf scrubbers. / Bioresource Technology, 99(17), 8137-142. CrossRef
  23. Hu, B., Zhou, W., Min, M., Du, Z., Chen, P., Ma, X., & Ruan, R. (2013). Development of an effective acidogenically digested swine manure-based algal system for improved wastewater treatment and biofuel and feed production. / Applied Energy, 107, 255-63. CrossRef
  24. Cole, J. J. (1982). Interactions between bacteria and algae in aquatic ecosystems. / Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13, 291-14. CrossRef
  25. Hellebust, J. A. (1965). Excretion of some organic compounds by marine phytoplankton. / Limnology and Oceanography, 10, 192-06. CrossRef
  26. Przytocka-Jusiak, M., Duszota, M., Matusiak, K., & Mycielski, R. (1984). Intensive culture of / Chlorella vulgaris/AA as the second stage of biological purification of nitrogen industry wastewaters. / Water Research, 18(1), 1-. CrossRef
  27. Matusiak, K., Przytocka-Jusiak, M., Leszczyńska-Gerula, K., & Horoch, M. (1976). Studies on the purification of wastewater from the nitrogen fertilizer industry by intensive algal cultures. II. Removal of nitrogen from the wastewater. / Acta Microbiologica Polonica, 25(4), 361.
  28. Pratt, R., Oneto, J. F., & Pratt, J. (1945). Studies on / Chlorella vulgaris. X. Influence of the age of the culture on the accumulation of chlorellin. / American Journal of Botany, 32, 405-08. CrossRef
  29. Roessler, P. G. (1990). Environmental control of glycerolipid metabolism in microalgae: commercial implications and future research directions. / Journal of Phycology, 26(3), 393-99. CrossRef
  30. Hu, Q., Sommerfeld, M., Jarvis, E., Ghirardi, M., Posewitz, M., Seibert, M., & Darzins, A. (2008). Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: perspectives and advances. / The Plant Journal, 54(4), 621-39. CrossRef
  31. Aaronson, S. (1973). Effect of incubation temperature on the macromolecular and lipid content of the phytoflagellate / Ochromonas danica. / Journal of Phycology, 9(1), 111-13. CrossRef
  32. Boussiba, S., Vonshak, A., Cohen, Z., Avissar, Y., & Richmond, A. (1987). Lipid and biomass production by the halotolerant microalga / Nannochloropsis salina. / Biomass, 12(1), 37-7. CrossRef
  33. Patterson, G. (1970). Effect of temperature on fatty acid composition of / Chlorella sorokiniana. / Lipids, 5(7), 597-00. CrossRef
  34. Du, Z., Li, Y., Wang, X., Wan, Y., Chen, Q., Wang, C., & Ruan, R. (2011). Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of microalgae for biofuel production. / Bioresource Technology, 102(7), 4890-896. CrossRef
  35. Mu, D., Min, M., Hill, J. (2013). Life cycle environmental impacts of novel technologies in the production of wastewater-based algal biofuels. / Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. (in press)
  36. Sun, A., Davis, R., Starbuck, M., Ben-Amotz, A., Pate, R., & Pienkos, P. T. (2011). Comparative cost analysis of algal oil production for biofuels. / Energy, 36(8), 5169-179. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Min Min (1)
  Bing Hu (1)
  Michael J. Mohr (1)
  Aimin Shi (1)
  Jinfeng Ding (1)
  Yong Sun (1)
  Yongcheng Jiang (1)
  Zongqiang Fu (1)
  Richard Griffith (1)
  Fida Hussain (1)
  Dongyan Mu (1)
  Yong Nie (1)
  Paul Chen (1)
  Wenguang Zhou (1)
  Roger Ruan (1)
  
  1. Center for Biorefining, Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, 1390 Eckles Ave, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, USA
  
• ISSN：1559-0291

文摘

Integration of wastewater treatment with algae cultivation is one of the promising ways to achieve an economically viable and environmentally sustainable algal biofuel production on a commercial scale. This study focused on pilot-scale algal biomass production system development, cultivation process optimization, and integration with swine manure wastewater treatment. The areal algal biomass productivity for the cultivation system that we developed ranged from 8.08 to 14.59 and 19.15-3.19?g/m2?×?day, based on ash-free dry weight and total suspended solid (TSS), respectively, which were higher than or comparable with those in literature. The harvested algal biomass had lipid content about 1.77-.55?%, which was relatively low, but could be converted to bio-oil via fast microwave-assisted pyrolysis system developed in our lab. The lipids in the harvested algal biomass had a significantly higher percentage of total unsaturated fatty acids than those grown in lab conditions, which may be attributed to the observed temperature and light fluctuations. The nutrient removal rate was highly correlated to the biomass productivity. The NH3-N, TN, COD, and PO4-P reduction rates for the north-located photo-bioreactor (PBR-N) in July were 2.65, 3.19, 7.21, and 0.067?g/m2?×?day, respectively, which were higher than those in other studies. The cultivation system had advantages of high mixotrophic growth rate, low operating cost, as well as reduced land footprint due to the stacked-tray bioreactor design used in the study.