弱透气性煤层受岩石下保护层开采影响卸压增透效果研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Study on pressure relief and permeability increasing effect on coal seam with low permeability influenced by mining of lower protective seam below rock
  • 作者:杨党委
  • 英文作者:Yang Dangwei;No.10 Coal Mine of Pingdingshan Tian′an Coal Industry Co.,Ltd.;
  • 关键词:弱透气性 ; 瓦斯治理 ; 保护层开采 ; 变形膨胀率 ; 卸压范围 ; 增透效果
  • 英文关键词:low permeability;;gas control;;protective seam mining;;deformation expansion ratio;;pressure relief range;;penetration effect
  • 中文刊名:ZZMT
  • 英文刊名:China Energy and Environmental Protection
  • 机构:平顶山天安煤业股份有限公司十矿;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-25 10:26
  • 出版单位:能源与环保
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.41;No.279
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZZMT201903003
  • 页数:6
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:41-1443/TK
  • 分类号:9-14
摘要
针对平煤股份十矿大埋深弱透气性煤层下保护层开采工程,采用岩石破裂损伤理论和有限元计算方法,研究了被保护层变形规律、应力演化过程、卸压保护范围及瓦斯抽采效果。结果表明,随着保护层工作面的推进,其上覆煤岩体同时发生拉伸应力和剪应力破坏,被保护层大量的裂隙扩展发育,孔隙率大幅提高;随着保护层的开采,被保护层呈现出压缩和膨胀的变化规律,位于保护层采空区中部上方的被保护层变形最大,变形膨胀率最大,因此有利于煤层的卸压增透和瓦斯的抽放;岩石下保护层开采后对被保护煤层沿倾斜方向预计保护范围卸压角为78°。工业试验显示:在己_(15-16)-24130岩石下保护层开采后,上覆己_(15-16)煤层变形膨胀率在0.62%~1.54%,己_(17)煤层变形膨胀率在1.71%~3.67%;在预计保护范围线位置测定的煤层最大综合残余瓦斯压力为0.42 MPa,最大残余瓦斯含量为4.210 7 m~3/t。证明预计保护范围是可靠的,为平煤十矿下保护层开采区域瓦斯治理技术的推广应用提供了可靠的依据。
        Aiming at the mining project of protective seam under large buried depth and weak permeability coal seam in Pingdingshan No.10 Coal Mine.The deformation law,stress evolution process,pressure relief protection range and gas drainage effect of the protected layer are studied by using rock fracture damage theory and finite element method.The analysis results showed that with the advance of the protective layer working face,both tensile stress and shear stress damage occur in the overlying coal and rock mass,a large number of cracks in the protective layer expand and develop,and the porosity increases greatly.With the exploitation of the protective layer,the protective layer presents the rule of compression and expansion.The protective layer located above the middle of the protective layer gob has the largest deformation and expansion rate,which is beneficial to pressure relief and permeability enhancement of coal seam and gas drainage.After mining,the pressure relief angle of the protected coal seam along the inclined direction is predicted to be 78 degrees.Field tests show that after mining of the protective layer under the rock of Ⅵ_(15-16)-24130,the swelling deformation of the overlying Ⅵ_(15-16) coal seam is between 0.62% and 1.54%,and that of the Ⅵ_(17) coal seam is between 1.71% and 3.67%.The maximum comprehensive residual gas pressure is 0.42 MPa and the maximum residual gas content is 4.210 7 m~3/t measured at the position of the predicted protection range line.It proves that the predicted protection range is reliable and provides a reliable basis for the popularization and application of gas control technology in the mining area of the lower protective layer in Pingdingshan No.10 Coal Mine.
引文
[1] 谢和平,周宏伟,薛东杰,等.煤炭深部开采与极限开采深度的研究与思考[J].煤炭学报,2012,37(4):535-542.Xie Heping,Zhou Hongwei,Xue Dongjie,et al.Research and consideration on deep coal mining and critical mining depth[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2012,37(4):535-542.
    [2] 何满潮.深部开采工程岩石力学现状及其展望[C]//第八次全国岩石力学与工程学术大会论文集,2004.
    [3] 李化敏,付凯.煤矿深部开采面临的主要技术问题及对策[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2006,23(4):468-471.Li Huamin,Fu Kai.Main technical problems and countermeasures in deep mining of coal mines[J].Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering,2006,23(4):468-471.
    [4] 石必明,俞启香.远距离保护层开采煤岩移动变形特性的试验研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2005,33(2):43-45,49.Shi Biming,Yu Qixiang.Test and research on coal and rock movement deformation characteristics in coal mining with long distance protection layer[J].Coal Science and Technology,2005,33(2):43-45,49.
    [5] 张拥军,于广明,路世豹,等.近距离上保护层开采瓦斯运移规律数值分析[J].岩土力学,2010,31(S1):398-404.Zhang Yongjun,Yu Guangming,Lu Shibao,et al.Numerical analysis of gas flow law with short distance upper protective layer gas extraction[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2010,31(S1):398-404.
    [6] 高峰,许爱斌,周福宝.保护层开采过程中煤岩损伤与瓦斯渗透性的变化研究[J].煤炭学报,2011,36(12):1979-1984.Gao Feng,Xu Aibin,Zhou Fubao.Study on changes of coal rock damage and gas permeability in protective layer mining process[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2011,36(12):1979-1984.
    [7] 郭世儒,茅献彪,缪盛凯.下保护层开采对上覆巷道围岩稳定性的影响[J].煤矿安全,2017,48(12):203-206.Guo Shiru,Mao Xianbiao,Miao Shengkai.Effect of mining of lower protective seam on surrounding rock stability of overburden roadway[J].Safety in Coal Mines,2017,48(12):203-206.
    [8] 王伟,程远平,袁亮,等.深部近距离上保护层底板裂隙演化及卸压瓦斯抽采时效性[J].煤炭学报,2016,41(1):138-148.Wang Wei,Cheng Yuanping,Yuan Liang,et al.The evolution of cracks on the bottom plate of the upper protection layer and the time effect of pressure relief gas drainage[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(1):138-148.
    [9] 袁东升,张子敏.近距离保护层开采瓦斯治理技术[J].煤炭科学技术,2009,37(11):48-50.Yuan Dongsheng,Zhang Zimin.Gas control technology in close distance protective seam mining[J].Coal Science and Technology,2009,37(11):48-50.
    [10] 刘彦伟,李国富.保护层开采及卸压瓦斯抽采技术的可靠性研究[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2013,30(3):426-431.Li Yanwei,Li Guofu.Reliability study of protective layer mining and pressure relief gas drainage technology[J].Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering,2013,30(3):426-431.
    [11] 李辉,贾薇薇.保护层开采保护范围确定研究[J].中州煤炭,2014(5):19-21. Li Hui,Jia Weiwei.Study on the determination of protective area in protective seam mining[J].Zhongzhou Coal,2014(5):19-21.
    [12] 高保彬,李回贵,王洪磊.UDEC下保护层开采裂隙演化及瓦斯渗流规律[J].河南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2013,32(5):518-522.Gao Baobin,Li Huigui,Wang Honglei.UDEC fracture evolution and gas seepage law in mining of lower protective seam[J].Journal of Henan Polytechnic University(Natural Science Edition),2013,32(5):518-522.
    [13] 王志强,冯锐敏,高运,等.突出煤层实现连续卸压的倾斜近距下保护层开采技术研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2013(Z2):3795-3803.Wang Zhiqiang,Feng Ruimin,Gao Yun,et al.Study on mining technology of inclined near-distance protective seam to realize continuous pressure relief in outburst coal seam[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2013(Z2):3795-3803.
    [14] 程志恒,齐庆新,李宏艳.近距离煤层群叠加开采采动应力——裂隙动态演化特征实验研究[J].煤炭学报,2016,41(2):367-375.Cheng Zhiheng,Qi Qingxin,Li Hongyan.Experimental study on dynamic evolution characteristics of mining dynamic stress and fracture in superimposed mining of coal seam group[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(2):367-375.
    [15] 李建伟,刘艳辉.平煤八矿远距离保护层开采可行性分析[J].矿业安全与环保,2011,38(2):80-81.Li Jianwei,Liu Yanhui.Feasibility analysis of long-distance protection seam mining in Pingdingshan No.8 Coal Mine[J].Mining Safety and Environmental Protection,2011,38(2):80-81.
    [16] 张福旺,李铁.平煤十矿煤与瓦斯动力灾害特征与规律分析[J].煤矿安全,2009,40(10):75-77.Zhang Fuwang,Li Tie.Analysis of characteristics and laws of coal and gas dynamic disasters in Pingdingshan No.10 Coal Mine[J].Safety in Coal Mines,2009,40(10):75-77.
    [17] 马红伟.平煤十矿本煤层深孔施工装备及工艺研究应用[J].煤炭科学技术,2009,37(10):7-10.Ma Hongwei.Research and application of deep hole construction equipment and technology in the ten coal mine of Pingdingshan Coal Mine[J].Coal Science and Technology,2009,37(10):7-10.
    [18] 耿仪,白新华,陈平生,等.平煤十矿井下水力压裂增透技术研究[J].中州煤炭,2013(5):1-4.Geng Yi,Bai Xinhua,Chen Pingsheng,et al.Research on hydraulic fracturing and permeability increasing technology in Pingdingshan Coal Mine ten mine[J].Zhongzhou Coal,2013(5):1-4.
    [19] 薛晓刚,王国际,黄励新,等.平煤十矿测定己组煤层抽放半径实践[J].能源技术与管理,2012(2):64-65.Xue Xiaogang,Wang Guoji,Huang Lixin,et al.Determination of drainage radius of group ten coal seam in Pingdingshan Coal Mine[J].Energy Technology and Management,2012(2):64-65.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.