摘要
【目的】提出面向期刊计量评价的多源数据融合方法,探析多源数据融合方法在期刊评价领域的应用价值,以期减少期刊评价中的信息缺失现象。【方法】选取谷歌学术、百度学术、Web of Science、中国知网和维普数据库中共同收录的40种国内理工科期刊为样本,分析期刊计量结果的差异性,在此基础上提出多源数据融合方法,利用篇均被引频次进行实证研究。【结果】不同数据源中的期刊计量评价结果差异较大。【结论】综合内容权重和逻辑权重的多源数据融合方法不仅可以融合每种数据源中期刊计量结果的优劣,还可以平衡各种数据源中期刊排名的差距。
[Purposes]This paper proposes a multi-source data fusion method for journal measurement evaluation,and analyzes its application value,so as to reduce the lack of information in the field of journal evaluation. [Methods]We selected 40 Chinese journals of science and engineering jointly included in Google Scholar,Baidu Scholar,Web of Science,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,and VIP Database,and then analyzed the differences of journals measurement results. Afterwards,we put forward the method of multi-source data fusion. Finally,we used journal citations per paper to verify whether the method was reasonable or not.[Findings]The results of journal measurement evaluation in different data sources are very different. [Conclusions]Multi-source data fusion method combining content weight and logical weight can not only combine the pros and cons of data in each data source,but also balance the gaps in journal ranking among various data sources.
引文
[1]苏林伟,于霜,许鑫,等.多源数据的期刊复合引文分析均值方法探析[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(19):100-107.
[2] Bornmann L,Thor A,Marx W,et al. The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences:An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2016,67(11):2778-2789.
[3]张英健.“百度学术搜索”在期刊编辑中的应用[J].编辑学报,2015,27(6):536-539.
[4]盛丽娜,顾欢. SSCI收录期刊不同学科Article和Review参考文献量的差异性分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018,29(11):1153-1159.
[5]丁佐奇.基于CiteScore的江苏省科技期刊国际影响力研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018,29(4):334-338.
[6]刘昌来,葛华忠.“互引指数”在期刊评价体系中的作用[J].科技与出版,2017(6):92-96.
[7]谭捷,张李义,饶丽君.中文学术期刊数据库的比较研究[J].图书情报知识,2010(4):4-13.
[8] Kulkarni A V,Aziz B,Shams I,et al. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science,Scopus,and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals[J]. Journal of the American Medical Association,2009,302(10):1092-1096.
[9] Bar-Ilan J. Citations to the"Introduction to informetrics"indexed by WOS,Scopus and Google Scholar[J]. Scientometrics,2010,82(3):495-506.
[10] Minasny B,Hartemink A E,Mcbratney A,et al. Citations and the h index of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science,Scopus,and Google Scholar[J]. PeerJ,2013,1(78):e183.
[11]洪道广,缪灵敏.百度学术的数据整合———基于学术数据库覆盖率的案例研究[J].现代情报,2018,38(3):133-137.
[12]刘岱,韦焘.中国知网与百度学术检索功能比较———从文献被引频次角度分析[J].教育教学论坛,2018(15):47-48.
[13]李亚君,李治森.三种引文数据库比较分析[J].情报探索,2009(7):69-71.
[14]骆维花.基于Google Scholar Metrics中文期刊h指数的比较研究[J].湖南科技学院学报,2015,36(9):177-182.
[15]许海云,董坤,隗玲,等.科学计量中多源数据融合方法研究述评[J].情报学报,2018,37(3):318-328.
[16] MerigóJ M. On the unification between the probability,the weighted average and the owa operator[C]. Intelligent Decision Making Systems-,International Iske Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering,2010:375-380.
[17] Ali A,Sara N. Sustainability assessment of wastewater reuse alternatives using the evidential reasoning approach[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2018(195):1350-1376.
[18]安世奇,由东媛.用于胎压监测系统的一种改进贝叶斯估计数据融合的研究[J].传感技术学报,2018,31(6):915-919.
[19] Jacso P. Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar,Scopus,and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster[J].Library Trends,2008,56(4):784-815.
[20] Groote S L D,Raszewski R. Coverage of Google Scholar,Scopus,and Web of Science:A case study of the h-index in nursing[J].Nursing Outlook,2012,60(6):391-400.
[21] Miri M S,Raoofi A,Heidari Z. Citation analysis of hepatitis monthly by Journal Citation Reports(ISI),Google Scholar,and Scopus[J]. Hepatitis Monthly,2012,12(9):e7441.
[22] Meho L I,Yang K. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty:Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2007,58(13):2105-2125.
[23] Falagas M E,Pitsouni E I,Malietzis G A,et al. Comparison of PubMed,Scopus,Web of Science,and Google Scholar:Strengths and weaknesses[J]. Faseb Journal Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology,2008,22(2):338-342.
[24]牛晓锋.不同影响因子百分位对期刊评价效力的比较研究[J].出版广角,2018(12):52-54.
[25]盛丽娜. CiteScore、CiteScore百分位与常用期刊评价指标的相关性分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018,29(6):605-611.
[26]王超,彭超群. H5指数评价中国材料类SCI期刊的适用性研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2016,27(12):1300-1304.
[27]梁梦晨,吴凡,郭锦晨.基于SPSS聚类分析的《洪桂医案》组方用药规律研究[J].中医药学报,2018,46(4):77-80.
