双层规划模型的大规模UCAV编队队形优化
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Formation optimization of large-scale UCAV based on bi-level programming model
  • 作者:宗群 ; 秦新立 ; 张博渊 ; 田栢苓 ; 赵欣怡
  • 英文作者:ZONG Qun;QIN Xinli;ZHANG Boyuan;TIAN Bailing;ZHAO Xinyi;School of Electrical Automation and Information Engineering, Tianjin University;
  • 关键词:大规模无人战斗机 ; 双层规划模型 ; 编队队形优化 ; 离散粒子群-模拟退火 ; 改进模拟退火
  • 英文关键词:large-scale UCAV;;bi-level programming model;;formation optimization;;DPSO-SA;;improved simulated annealing
  • 中文刊名:HEBX
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology
  • 机构:天津大学电气自动化与信息工程学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-11 15:10
  • 出版单位:哈尔滨工业大学学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.51
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金(61673294,61573060);; 装备预研教育部联合基金(6141A02022328)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HEBX201903002
  • 页数:8
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:23-1235/T
  • 分类号:21-28
摘要
为解决复杂约束环境下大规模无人战斗机(UCAV)编队队形优化问题,提出基于双层规划模型的队形优化求解算法.以大规模UCAV编队空对地饱和打击作战场景为例,建立UCAV编队作战上层规划模型,通过采用离散粒子群-模拟退火(DPSO-SA)算法进行求解,得到执行每个任务的UCAV编号和最优队形;根据现有的编队作战队形库,建立编队中UCAV站位下层规划模型,通过采用遗传算法进行求解,得到UCAV在队形中的位置.仿真结果表明:在上层规划模型中引入改进模拟退火算法,可以解决离散粒子群算法易陷入局部极小值的问题;设计双层规划模型,可以解决DPSO-SA算法后期收敛速度慢的问题.相对于单层规划模型,双层规划模型求解大规模UCAV编队队形优化问题收敛速度更快,寻优效果更好.
        In order to optimize the formation of large-scale unmanned combat aircraft vehicle(UCAV) in complex constraint environment, an algorithm for formation optimization based on bi-level programming model was proposed. According to the existing UCAV formation combat mode of air to ground, the upper-level model of UCAV formation in combat environment was established. The discrete particle swarm optimization and simulated annealing(DPSO-SA) algorithm was used to obtain the number of UCAV and the best formation of each task. According to the existing formation library, the lower-level model of the UCAV location was built, and the UCAV position in the formation was obtained by using the genetic algorithm. The simulation results show that the improved simulated annealing algorithm can solve the problem that the discrete particle swarm optimization is easy to fall into local minimum, and the slow convergence rate of DPSO-SA can be solved with the design of a bi-level programming model. Compared with the single-level programming model, the bi-level programming model has faster convergence speed and better optimization effect on solving large-scale UCAV formation optimization problems.
引文
[1] 邱华鑫, 段海滨, 范彦铭. 基于鸽群行为机制的多无人机自主编队[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2015, 32(10): 1298 QIU Huaxin, DUAN Haibin, FAN Yanming. Multiple unmanned aerial vehicle autonomous formation based on the behavior mechanism in pigeon flocks[J]. Control Theory & Applications, 2015, 32(10): 1298. DOI: 10.7641/CTA.2015.50314
    [2] SCHOERLING D, KLEECK C V, FAHIMI F, et al. Experimental test of a robust formation controller for marine unmanned surface vessels[J]. Autonomous Robots, 2010, 28(2): 213. DOI: 10.1007/s10514-009-9163-6.
    [3] 宗群, 王丹丹, 邵士凯,等. 多无人机协同编队飞行控制研究现状及发展[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2017, 49(3): 1 ZONG Qun, WANG Dandan, SHAO Shikai, et al. Research status and development of multi UAV coordinated formation flight control[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017, 49(3): 1. DOI:10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.2017.03.001
    [4] 宗群, 秦新立, 张博渊,等. 基于DPSO-GT-SA算法的大规模UCAV协同任务分配[J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2018, 51(10): 1005 ZONG Qun,QIN Xinli, ZHANG Boyuan, et al. Cooperative task allocation of large-scale UCAV based on DPSO-GT-SA algorithm[J]. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology), 2018, 51(10): 1005. DOI:10.11784/tdxbz201711069
    [5] 张博渊, 宗群, 鲁瀚辰,等. 基于hp自适应伪谱法的四旋翼无人机编队轨迹优化[J]. 中国科学:技术科学, 2017, 35(7): 69 ZHANG Boyuan, ZONG Qun, LU Hanchen, et al. Trajectory optimization of quad-rotor UAV formation using hp-adaptive pseudospectral method[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2017, 35(7): 69. DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2017.07.008
    [6] WANG D, ZONG Q, TIAN B, et al. Neural network disturbance observer-based distributed finite-time formation tracking control for multiple unmanned helicopters[J]. Isa Transactions, 2018.DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2017.12.011
    [7] 钱斌, 姜长生. 遗传算法在直升机空战编队优化中的应用[J]. 电光与控制, 2008, 15(1): 6 QIAN Bin, JIANG Changsheng.On air combat formation of helicopters based on genetic algorithm[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2008, 15(1): 6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2008.01.002
    [8] 夏庆军, 张安, 张耀中. 大规模编队空战队形优化算法[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2010, 27(10): 1418 XIA Qingjun, ZHANG An, ZHANG Yaozhong. Formation optimizing algorithm for large-scale air combat[J]. Control Theory & Applications, 2010, 27(10): 1418. DOI: 10.7641/j.issn.1000-8152.2010.10.CCTA090692
    [9] SPANOGIANOPOULOS S, ZHANG Q, SPURGEON S. Fast formation of swarm of UAVs in congested urban environment[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2017, 50(1): 8031. DOI:10.1016/j.if acol.2017.08.1228
    [10]赵志刚, 顾新一, 李陶深. 求解双层规划模型的粒子群优化算法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2007, 27(8): 92 ZHAO Zhigang, GU Xinyi, LI Taoshen. Particle swarm optimization for bi-level programming problem[J]. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2007, 27(8): 92. DOI: 10.12011/1000-6788(2007)8-92
    [11]余丽山, 李彦彬, 金学科,等. 双层规划模型在导弹破片杀伤战斗部优化设计中的应用[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2017, 37(2): 71 YU Lishan, LI Yanbin, JIN Xueke, et al. Application of bi-level programming model in optimization design of missile fragmenting warhead[J]. Journal of Projectiles Rockets Missiles & Guidance, 2017, 37(2): 71. DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2017. 02.017
    [12]FAN C L, XING Q H, FU Q, et al. Bi-level programming modeling and hierarchical hybrid algorithm for antimissile dynamic firepower allocation problem with uncertain environment[J]. Pattern Analysis & Applications, 2017, 20(1): 287. DOI: 10.1007/s10044-016-0562-y
    [13]SUN Z. Continuous transportation network design problem based on bi-level programming model[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 137: 277. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.259
    [14]郑东亮, 薛云灿, 杨启文,等. 基于Inver-Over算子的改进离散粒子群优化算法[J]. 模式识别与人工智能, 2010, 23 (1): 97 ZHENG Dongliang, XUE Yuncan, YANG Qiwen, et al. Modified discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm based on Inver-Over operator[J]. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2010, 23(1): 97. DOI: 10.16451/j.cnki.issn1003-6059.2010.01.013
    [15]BANK M, GHOMI S M T F, JOLAI F, et al. Application of particle swarm optimization and simulated annealing algorithms in flow shop scheduling problem under linear deterioration[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2012, 47(1): 1. DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.12.001
    [16]GUO H, LI J, HONG G. A survey of bilevel programming model and algorithm[C]// Fourth International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design. Hangzhou: IEEE, 2011: 199. DOI: 10.1109/ISCID.2011.151
    [17]常一哲, 李战武, 寇英信,等. 不确定信息条件下空战接敌队形选择方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38(11): 2552 CHANG Yizhe, LI Zhanwu, KOU Yingxin,et al. Method for formation selection in air combat under uncertain information condition[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38 (11): 2552. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2016.11.16
    [18]朱旭. 基于信息一致性的多无人机编队控制方法研究[D]. 西安:西北工业大学, 2014 ZHU Xu.Research on multi-UAV formation control based on information consensus[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2014
    [19]欧超杰. 多无人机编队控制技术研究[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学, 2015 OU Chaojie.UAVs formation flight control[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015
    [20]ZHU S, WANG D, LOW C B. Cooperative control of multiple UAVs for moving source seeking[C]// International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Atlanta: IEEE, 2013. DOI:10.1109/ICUAS.2013.6564690
    [21]王芳. 导弹编队协同突防-攻击一体化队形优化设计及最优控制研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2016 WANG Fang. Formation optimal design and optimal control method for integrative penetration and attack of missile formation cooperation[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.