摘要
目的:探讨不同麻醉剂电休克治疗方法对难治性抑郁症患者心功能的临床研究。方法:随机选取收治的144例难治性抑郁症患者,其中对照组72例电休克治疗中麻醉剂为丙泊酚;观察组72例难治性抑郁症患者在电休克治疗中采用的麻醉剂为依托咪酯,对比两组患者治疗后的心电图异常以及整个治疗期间的心率情况。结果:两组患者在治疗期间的心电图异常率方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05);两组患者在治疗中较治疗前与治疗后心率明显升高,差异具有统计学意义(P <0. 05),两组患者在不同时间段的心率方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。结论:电休克治疗会造成难治性抑郁症患者在治疗期间出现心电图异常,但是在治疗后可快速恢复,不同麻醉剂电休克治疗对难治性抑郁症患者心功能影响差异性较小。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of different anesthetic agents on electroconvulsive therapy in patients with refractory depression. Method 144 patients with refractory depression were randomly selected,of which 72 cases in the control group were propofol in the treatment of electroconvulsive therapy; in the observation group,the anesthetic agent used in the treatment of electroconvulsive treatment was etomil in 72 patients with refractory depression,compared with the two groups of patients after the treatment of electrocardiogram and the whole period of treatment. The heart rate situation. Results There was no significant difference in the abnormal rate of electrocardiogram between the two groups,and there was no statistical significance(P > 0. 05). The heart rate of the two groups was significantly higher than that before and after treatment. The difference was statistically significant(P < 0. 05). The difference between the two groups in the heart rate of different time periods was unclear. There was no statistical significance(P > 0. 05). Conclusion Electroconvulsive therapy can cause abnormal electrocardiogram in patients with refractory depression during the treatment,but it can recover quickly after treatment. Different anesthetic agents have little difference in heart effect on patients with refractory depression.
引文
[1]黄兴兵,黄雄,何红波,等.不同麻醉剂电休克治疗对难治性抑郁症患者认知功能的影响[J].广东医学,2017,38(1):119.
[2]黄兴兵,梅芳,黄雄,等.不同麻醉剂无抽搐电休克治疗难治性抑郁症的疗效比较[J].实用医学杂志,2015,(17):2808.
[3]于建民,刘松峰,冯勇.依托咪酯复合右美托咪定在无抽搐电休克治疗难治性抑郁症中的优越性[J].医学与哲学,2015,36(20):34.
[4]张殷,陈小容,田璐,等.无抽搐电休克应用依托咪酯联合丙泊酚诱导麻醉的价值评估[J].心理医生,2017,23(28):203.
[5]欧益金,张春平,邓丽芳.不同剂量依托咪酯在无抽搐电休克治疗中的应用[J].实用医学杂志,2015,31(1):160.
[6]喻妍,杨栋,赵靖平,等.难治性抑郁症认知功能的研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23(1):101.
[7]马小燕,季卫东.难治性抑郁症患者认知功能对照研究[J].临床心身疾病杂志,2015,21(6):90.
[8]李启荣,何红波,张春平,等. MECT对难治性抑郁症患者认知功能的影响[J].山东医药,2015,(18):41.
[9]杨宏海.无抽搐电休克治疗难治性抑郁症的临床特点分析[J].中国医药指南,2017,15(29):82.
[10]隋国梁.难治性抑郁症和首发抑郁症听觉P50与认知功能的相关研究[J].母婴世界,2017,(12):61.
[11]李敏智,李毅.依托咪酯与丙泊酚在无抽搐电休克治疗中的价值研究[J].卫生职业教育,2018,36(1):149.
[12]梁雅慧.重复经颅磁刺激对认知功能影响的研究进展[J].中国康复医学杂志,2015,30(9):959.
[13]倪晓东,卓恺明,刘艳红.疏肝解郁胶囊辅助艾司西酞普兰对痰热郁结型老年难治性抑郁症患者认知功能及血清TSH、IL-6和TNF-α的影响[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2017,26(18):2035.
[14] Vrinda M,Sasidharan A,Apama S,et al. Enriched environment attenuates behavioral seizures and depression in chronic?temporal lobe epilepsy[J]. Epilepsia,2017,58(7):1148.
[15] Rayner G,Jackson GD,Wilson SJ,et al. Behavioral profiles in frontal lobe epilepsy:Autobiographic memory versus mood impairment[J]. Epilepsia,2015,56(2):225.
