WRF模式中不同土地利用数据对新疆一次高温天气模拟的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Influences of Updated Land-use Dataset on Temperature Simulations by WRF in Xinjiang
  • 作者:马玉芬 ; 肖莲媛 ; 李火青 ; 杜娟
  • 英文作者:MA Yufen;XIAO Lianyuan;LI Huoqing;DU Juan;Institute of Atmospheric Physics, China Academy of Sciences;Institute of Desert Meteorology,China Meteorological Administration;Center of Central Asia Atmospheric Science Research;Ruoqiang Meteorologicasl Bureau;
  • 关键词:土地利用 ; MODIS ; USGS ; 温度 ; 新疆
  • 英文关键词:land-use;;MODIS;;USGS;;air temperature;;Xinjiang
  • 中文刊名:XJQX
  • 英文刊名:Desert and Oasis Meteorology
  • 机构:中国科学院大气物理研究院;中国气象局乌鲁木齐沙漠气象研究所;中亚大气科学研究中心;若羌气象局;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:沙漠与绿洲气象
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.13;No.73
  • 基金:中亚大气科学研究基金(CAAS201815);; 国家自然科学基金(41805075,41505025)资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XJQX201901008
  • 页数:11
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:65-1265/P
  • 分类号:54-64
摘要
本研究在WRF(v3.8.1)中分别使用MODIS 21类和USGS 24类土地利用类型数据,模拟了新疆2017年7月9日的极端高温天气,并在对模拟温度进行了高度订正的基础上,对比了两种土地利用数据对2 m温度预报的影响。结果表明:(1)MODIS和USGS在新疆地区的土地利用差异主要在阿尔泰山、天山以及南疆西部的昆仑山北部海拔3000 m以上的高山带,相应地,使用USGS模拟的这些高山带2 m气温明显高于使用MODIS的模拟值,最高偏高12 K左右,是全疆范围内两者偏差的极大值。(2)就新疆区域而言,使用USGS模拟的2 m气温整体优于使用MODIS的模拟值,且USGS模拟的2 m温度整体低于MODIS模拟的2 m温度。两者与实况的偏差多在2 K以内。(3)在伊犁河谷,MODIS土地利用类型主要为"旱地/草地",USGS为"草地"和"农田/林地马赛克"。伊犁河谷代表站点2 m温度模拟多以高温偏低、低温偏高为主。(4)与MODIS相比,USGS中哈密地区"农田/林地马赛克"所占比重明显增大。哈密地区多数代表站点高、低温均以偏低为主。(5)站点温度的高度订正多以调低为主,调低幅度最大值为1.9 K,出现在伊犁河谷的尼勒克站。站点2 m温度的调整幅度整体上明显大于MODIS和USGS模拟2 m温度的差值,由此可见温度高度订正的必要性。
        The land-use data types of MODIS-21 and USGS-24 are used in this study with WRF(V3.8.1) to simulate an extreme high temperature weather process occurred on July 9 th 2017 in Xinjiang. The effects of two land-use data on the simulation of the 2 m air temperature(T2 m) were further compared with a height correction 0.65 K/100 m upon T2 m. It is found that,firstly,the land use difference between MODIS and USGS in Xinjiang area is mainly in the alpine zone of the Tianshan Mountains and the northern Kunlun Mountains above 3000 meters over sea level. Accordingly,the temperature of these alpine zones with the USGS simulation is obviously higher than that of the model using MODIS. The maximum positive bias is about 12 K,which is also the maximum bias value in the whole Xinjiang. Secondly,T2 msimulated by USGS is generally better than that simulated by MODIS in Xinjiang,and T2 msimulated by USGS is lower than that simulated by MODIS,while both are within 2 K. Thirdly,the land-use type in the Ili River Valley is mainly "dry land/grassland"in the MODIS,while"grassland"and"farmland/woodland mosaic"in the USGS,and both of the maximum simulated temperatures are higher than that of truth while the minimum lower. Furthermore,compared with MODIS,the proportion of "farmland/woodland mosaic"in the Hami region increased significantly in USGS,and both of the simulations for the 2 m air temperatures in Hami are mainly lower than the truth. Finally,the height correction of site temperature is mainly reduction,and the maximum of the height adjustment is 1.9 K, appeared in the Nilka Station in the Ili River Valley. The height adjustment range is obviously greater than the difference between the MODIS and USGS simulated 2 m temperatures,which indicates the necessity of the height adjustment of simulated 2 m temperature.
引文
[1] Sr R A P,Pitman A,Niyogi D,et al. Land use/land cover changes and climate:modeling analysis and observational evidence[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change,2011,2(6):828-850.
    [2]琚陈相,李淑娟,于晓晶,等.GRAPES模式中不同陆面方案对新疆一次强降水事件的模拟[J].沙漠与绿洲气象,2014,8(6):6-22.
    [3] Meij A D,Vinuesa J F. Impact of SRTM and Corine Land Cover data on meteorological parameters using WRF[J].Atmospheric Research,2014,143(12):351-370.
    [4] Loveland T R,Reed B C,Brown J F,et al. Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing,2000,21(6-7):1303-1330.
    [5] Giovannini L,Antonacci G,Zardi D,et al. Sensitivity of simulated wind speed to spatial resolution over complex terrain[J]. Energy Procedia,2014,59:323-329.
    [6] Ezber Y,Sen O L,Kindap T,et al. Climatic effects of urbanization in istanbul:a statistical and modeling analysis[J]. International Journal of Climatology,2007,27(5):667-679.
    [7] Grell G A Dudhia J, stauffer D R. A description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model(MM5),NCAR/TN-398+STR[M]. Ncar Technical Note,1994.
    [8] Jiang X, Wiedinmyer C, Chen F, et al. Predicted impacts of climate and land use change on surface ozone in the Houston,Texas,area[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres,2008,113(D20).
    [9] Sertel E,Roboc K A,Ormeci C,et al. Impacts of land cover data quality on regional climate simulations.[J]. International Journal of Climatology,2010,30(13):1942-1953.
    [10] Anderson J R,Hardy E E,Roac J T,et al. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data[M]. 1976.
    [11] Friedl M A, Sullamenashe D, Tan B, et al. MODIS collection 5 global land cover:algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets.[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,2010,114(1):168-182.
    [12] Friedl M A,Mciver DK,Hodges J C F,et al. Global land cover mapping from MODIS:algorithms and early results[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,2002,83(1-2):287-302.
    [13] Masson V,Champeaux J L,Chauvin F,et al. A global database of land surface parameters at 1-km resolution in meteorological and climate models.[J]. Journal of Climate,2003,16(9):2003.
    [14] Bartholome E M,Belward A S. A new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data. Int J Remote Sens[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing,2005,26(9):1959-1977.
    [15] Hansen M C,Defries R S,Townshend J R G,et al.Global land cover classification at 1 Km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,2000,21(6-7):1331-1364..
    [16] Lotsch A, Tian Y, Friedl M A, et al. Land cover mapping in support of LAI and FPAR retrievals from EOS-MODIS and MISR:Classification methods and sensitivities to errors[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing,2003,24(10):1997-2016.
    [17] Myneni R B,Hoffman S,KnyaziKhin Y,et al. Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,2002,83(1):214-231.
    [18] Running S W,Loveland T R,Pierce L L,et al. A remote sensing based vegetation classification logic for global land cover analysis.[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,1995,51(1):39-48.
    [19] Bonan G B. The land surface climatology of the NCAR land surface model coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model[J]. Journal of Climate,2002,15(15):3123-3149.
    [20] Loveland T R,Reed B C,Brown J F,et al.Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP discover from 1 km AVHRR data[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing,2000,21(6-7):1303-1330.
    [21]马玉芬,赵玲,赵勇.天山地形对新疆强降水天气影响的数值模拟研究[J].沙漠与绿洲气象,2012,6(5):40-45.
    [22]王颖,梁依玲,王丽霞.复杂地形气象场对污染物浓度空间分布影响的研究[J].沙漠与绿洲气象,2015,9(2):69-74.
    [23] Schic Ker I,Arias D A,Seibert P. Influences of updated land-use datasets on WRF simulations for two Austrian regions[J]. Meteorology&Atmospheric Physics,2015,128(3):1-23.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.