标准大骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑损伤患者的临床效果分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Clinical Analysis of Standard Large Bone Flap Decompression for Patients With Severe Craniocerebral Injury
  • 作者:姚剑清 ; 陈江宾 ; 王辉振 ; 王炳祥
  • 英文作者:YAO Jianqing;CHEN Jiangbin;WANG Huizhen;WANG Bingxiang;Department of Neurosurgery,People's Hospital Affiliated to Quanzhou Medical College;
  • 关键词:重型颅脑损伤 ; 标准大骨瓣减压 ; 常规颞顶骨瓣开颅术 ; 颅内压 ; 神经功能 ; 并发症
  • 英文关键词:severe craniocerebral injury;;standard large bone flap decompression;;conventional dome craniotomy;;intracranial pressure;;neurological function;;complication
  • 中文刊名:JXUY
  • 英文刊名:China Continuing Medical Education
  • 机构:福建省泉州医学高等专科学校附属人民医院神经外科;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-10
  • 出版单位:中国继续医学教育
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.11
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:JXUY201901042
  • 页数:3
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:11-5709/R
  • 分类号:104-106
摘要
目的探讨标准大骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑损伤患者的临床效果。方法将2015年9月—2017年9月我院收治的60例重型颅脑损伤患者,按手术方式分为参照组(常规颞顶骨瓣开颅术)和研究组(标准大骨瓣减压术),各30例。比较两组临床治疗效果,手术前后颅内压水平和美国国立卫生院神经功能缺损评分(NIH Stroke,NIHSS),以及术后并发症发生情况。结果研究组的临床治疗效果明显优于参照组(P <0.05)。手术后,两组颅内压水平和NIHSS评分均有所下降,且研究组的下降程度大于参照组(均P <0.05)。研究组术后并发症发生率为3.33%,明显低于参照组的26.67%(P <0.05)。结论标准大骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑损伤可以有效降低患者颅内压、改善术后神经功能并减少并发症发生。
        Objective To explore the clinical effect of standard large bone flap decompression for patients with severe craniocerebral injury. Methods60 patients with severe craniocerebral injury admitted to our hospital from September 2015 to September 2017 were divided into a reference group(conventional cranial craniotomy) and a study group(standard large cranial decompression) according to the surgical method, with 30 cases in each group. The clinical treatment effect, intracranial pressure levels and the National Institutes of Health Neurological Deficit Score(NIHSS) before and after surgery, and postoperative complications between the two groups were compared. Results The clinical treatment effect of the study group was significantly better than that of the reference group(P < 0.05). After surgery, both intracranial pressure and NIHSS scores were decreased, and the decrease in the study group was greater than that in the reference group(both P < 0.05).The postoperative complication rate was 3.33% in the study group, which was significantly lower than the 26.67% in the reference group(P < 0.05). Conclusion Standard large bone decompression for severe craniocerebral injury can effectively reduce intracranial pressure, improve postoperative neurological function and reduce complications.
引文
[1]刘兴海,马钢.外伤大骨瓣开颅术治疗重型颅脑损伤的远期效果观察[J].中外医学研究,2015,13(8):8-10.
    [2]栾雷.重型颅脑损伤标准大骨瓣开颅术患者围术期炎性应激及代谢状态的变化[J].海南医学院学报,2016,22(14):1541-1543.
    [3]赵明星,王超.标准大骨瓣减压术与常规骨瓣开颅术治疗重型颅脑损伤的临床疗效[J].世界临床医学,2016,10(8):81.
    [4]杨公利,韩帮华.标准大骨瓣术与常规大骨瓣术治疗重型颅脑损伤的近远期疗效观察[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2016,19(23):125-126.
    [5]王忠诚.神经外科学[M].武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,2005:27-32.
    [6]宋旭敏,任青,程忠平.格拉斯哥预后评分预测肿瘤的临床价值[J].医学综述,2017,23(12):2354-2358.
    [7]陈周昌.标准大骨瓣减压术与常规骨瓣开颅术治疗重型颅脑损伤的效果比较研究[J].临床合理用药杂志,2017,10(33):141-142.
    [8]王首杰,高国栋,秦怀洲.标准去大骨瓣开颅减压术治疗重型颅脑损伤临床疗效观察[J].神经损伤与功能重建,2014,9(6):498-500.
    [9]郭根明.比较标准大骨瓣减压术与常规骨瓣开颅术治疗重型颅脑损伤的疗效[J].临床医学,2016,36(2):73-74.
    [10]赵龙,刘泉,林岚.标准大骨瓣减压术对重型颅脑损伤患者脑血流动力学及代谢状态的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016,20(19):83-85.
    [11]赵永田.标准大骨瓣开颅术治疗重型颅脑损伤临床研究[J].中国卫生标准管理,2018,9(14):26-28.
    [12]陈家祥,李良平,梁一鸣,等.标准大骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑损伤的疗效观察[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2017,22(7):506-507.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.