交趾黄檀1年生容器苗分级标准研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Grading standards of one-year-old container seedlings of Dalbergia cochinchinensis
  • 作者:罗明道 ; 洪舟 ; 李科 ; 徐大平 ; 张宁南 ; 麦宝莹 ; 黄锡钊
  • 英文作者:LUO Mingdao;HONG Zhou;LI Ke;XU Daping;ZHANG Ningnan;MAI Baoying;HUANG Xizhao;Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry;Research Institute of Forestry of Gaoming Zone,Foshan;
  • 关键词:交趾黄檀 ; 容器苗 ; 分级 ; 平均值±标准差法 ; 逐步聚类法 ; 红木树种 ; 造林效果
  • 英文关键词:Dalbergia cochinchinensis;;container seedling;;grading;;mean ± standard deviation method;;progressive clustering method;;redwood;;afforestation effect
  • 中文刊名:HNNB
  • 英文刊名:Journal of South China Agricultural University
  • 机构:中国林业科学研究院热带林业研究所;广东省佛山市高明区林业科学研究所;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-30 09:11
  • 出版单位:华南农业大学学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.40
  • 基金:国家林业局引进国际先进林业科学技术计划项目(2015-4-11,2016-4-04)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HNNB201902012
  • 页数:7
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:44-1110/S
  • 分类号:82-88
摘要
【目的】开展1年生交趾黄檀Dalbergia cochinchinensis容器苗质量评价,为其壮苗培育和人工林规模发展提供技术支撑。【方法】应用主成分分析法确定交趾黄檀苗木分级指标,通过平均值±标准差法和逐步聚类法比较分析各等级苗木比例、标准以及在广东阳江、高明和福建漳州不同级别苗木的早期造林效果的差异,确定合理的交趾黄檀苗木质量分级方法与分级标准。【结果】苗高(H)和地径(D) 2个性状的主成分贡献率分别为59.85%和26.02%,累积方差贡献率为85.87%,H和D可作为1年生交趾黄檀苗木分级指标,各等级苗木之间存在着显著差异。2种不同方法确定的交趾黄檀各等级苗木比例、等级取值范围无明显差异。应用平均值±标准差法分级的交趾黄檀合格苗(Ⅰ和Ⅱ级苗)在各试验点的早期生长表现良好、造林成活率(90%以上)较高;造林3和12个月时,苗木建成形态和成活率与造林时的H和D呈极显著正相关。【结论】综合各等级苗木比率、等级取值范围、早期造林效果以及实际育苗生产过程,1年生交趾黄檀苗木质量分级宜采用平均值±标准差法,其分级标准为:Ⅰ级苗,H≥119.76 cm,D≥7.66 mm;Ⅱ级苗,69.62 cm≤H <119.76 cm,5.04 mm≤D <7.66 mm;Ⅲ级苗,H <69.62 cm,D <5.04 mm。
        【Objective】To evaluate the quality of one-year-old container seedlings of Dalbergia cochinchinensis,and provide a technical basis for its seedling cultivation and plantation development.【Method】Seedling grading indexes were determined by principal components analysis. We used the mean ± standard deviation and progressive clustering methods to analyze the proportions of seedlings in different grades, grading standards and differences among grades in afforestation effects at early stage of seedlings in Yangjiang, Gaoming of Guangdong and Zhangzhou of Fujian. The suitable grading method and standards were determined.【Result】The principal component contribution rates of seedling height(H) and ground diameter(D) were59.85% and 26.02%, respectively. H and D could be used as the grading indexes for one-year-old D.cochinchinensis seedlings, and these traits were significantly different among different graded seedlings. The cumulative variance contribution rate of seedling height and ground diameter was 85.87%. There were no obvious differences in the proportions of seedlings in each grade and grading ranges between two grading methods. Qualified D. cochinchinensis seedlings(Grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ) determined by the mean ± standard deviation method performed well in the early growth period and had higher survival rates(>90%) at all test sites. Seedling traits and survival rates after planting of 3 and 12 months had highly significant positive correlations with H and D at planting time.【Conclusion】The mean ± standard deviation method is more feasible for grading of one-year-old D. cochinchinensis seedlings by comprehensively evaluating the proportions of seedlings in different grades, ranges of grading indexes, early afforestation effect and practical seedling cultivation. The grading standards are as follows: Grade Ⅰof H ≥ 119.76 cm and D ≥ 7.66 mm; grade Ⅱ of69.62 cm ≤ H < 119.76 cm and 5.04 mm ≤ D < 7.66 mm; grade Ⅲ of H < 69.62 cm and D < 5.04 mm.
引文
[1]中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所.红木:GB/T:18107-2000[S].北京:国家质量技术监督局,2000.
    [2]MORITSUKA E,CHHANG P,TAGANE T,et al.Genetic variation and population structure of a threatened timber tree Dalbergia cochinchinensis in Cambodia[J].Tree Genet Genomes,2017,13(6):115.
    [3]吴培衍,张荣标,张金文.红木树种新贵:交趾黄檀[J].福建热作科技,2016,41(4):51-54.
    [4]李科,洪舟,杨曾奖,等.不同种源交趾黄檀种子形态及多点发芽率的差异[J].浙江农林大学学报,2018,35(1):121-127.
    [5]鲁敏,姜凤岐,宋轩.容器苗质量评定指标的研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(6):763-765.
    [6]周新华,黄拯,厉月桥,等.杉木容器苗分级标准研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2017,37(9):68-73.
    [7]李玉莲,张亚楠,王子奕.评价出圃苗木质量的几个主要指标[J].林业科技,2007,32(4):12-13.
    [8]曾郁珉,刘金凤,苏俊武,等.高阿丁枫苗木分级研究[J].西部林业科学,2006,35(3):43-48.
    [9]杨斌,周凤林,史富强,等.铁力木苗木分级研究[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21(1):85-89.
    [10]封丹,张厚江,季梦婷.苗木质量分级方法研究综述[J].林业机械与木工设备,2016,44(4):10-15.
    [11]方碧江.降香黄檀苗木分级标准的探讨[J].福建热作科技,2009,34(4):30-32.
    [12]周双清,周亚东,吴群富,等.海南降香黄檀种苗分级标准[J].西部林业科学,2015,44(3):26-30.
    [13]黎明,黄柏华,韦叶桥,等.降香黄檀轻基质容器苗分级标准研究[J].南方农业学报,2016,47(12):2103-2107.
    [14]史富强,杨斌,付玉嫔,等.铁力木造林苗木分级标准及施肥试验研究[J].林业调查规划,2010,35(5):28-30.
    [15]闫彩霞,杨锦昌,尹光天,等.米老排不同高度级苗木形态特征的分析[J].林业资源管理,2013(5):98-102.
    [16]楚秀丽,吴利荣,汪和木,等.马尾松和木荷不同类型苗木造林后幼林生长建成差异[J].东北林业大学学报,2015,43(6):25-29.
    [17]周凤林,李玉媛,史富强,等.印度紫檀苗木分级研究[J].西部林业科学,2004,33(2):29-33.
    [18]林元震,陈晓阳.R与ASReml-R统计分析教程[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2014:99-136.
    [19]刘佳嘉,李国雷,刘勇,等.容器类型和胚根短截对栓皮栎容器苗苗木质量及造林初期效果的影响[J].林业科学,2017,53(6):47-55.
    [20]王印肖,田冬.苗木质量分级与检测方法[J].河北林业科技,2005(4):61-62.
    [21]潘超美,黄崇才,郑芳昊,等.药用植物土沉香种苗分级标准的研究[J].广州中医药大学学报,2012,29(2):180-184.
    [22]杨斌,赵文书,姜远标,等.思茅松造林苗木选择及施肥效应[J].浙江农林大学学报,2005,2(4):396-399.
    [23]郑益兴,冯永刚,彭兴民,等.印楝1年生苗木生长节律与数量分级标准[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(3):25-30.
    [24]赵建华,叶力勤,安巍,等.宁夏枸杞苗木分级及不同质量苗木定植初期生长特征[J].浙江农林大学学报,2011,28(3):450-454.
    [25]陈琳,曾杰,贾宏炎,等.容器规格和基质配方对红锥幼苗生长及造林效果的影响[J].林业科学,2017,53(3):76-83.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.