交趾黄檀种源苗期生长性状地理变异和遗传稳定性分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Geographical variation and genetic stability of seedling traits of Dalbergia cochinchinensis from different provenances
  • 作者:麦宝莹 ; 洪舟 ; 徐大平 ; 罗明道 ; 张宁南 ; 黄锡钊
  • 英文作者:MAI Baoying;HONG Zhou;XU Daping;LUO Mingdao;ZHANG Ningnan;HUANG Xizhao;Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry;Research Institute of Forestry of Gaoming Zone;
  • 关键词:交趾黄檀 ; 种源 ; 苗期性状 ; 地理变异 ; 遗传稳定性
  • 英文关键词:Dalbergia cochinchinensis Pierre;;provenance;;seedling trait;;geographical variation;;genetic stability
  • 中文刊名:NJLY
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
  • 机构:中国林业科学研究院热带林业研究所;广东省佛山市高明区林业科学研究所;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-08 11:30
  • 出版单位:南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.43;No.200
  • 基金:国家林业局“948”项目(2015-4-11,2016-4-04)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:NJLY201902023
  • 页数:7
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:32-1161/S
  • 分类号:172-178
摘要
【目的】交趾黄檀(Dalbergia cochinchinensis)是珍稀红木树种之一,其木材及木制品极为珍贵,亦具有重要的药用价值。为了研究交趾黄檀不同种源的苗木生长差异、种源与环境互作效应、地理变异模式以及遗传稳定性,进行不同种源交趾黄檀苗期生长评价,为交趾黄檀的幼林期试验提供科学指导和理论支持,也为今后进一步开展交趾黄檀优良种源选择和育苗工作奠定基础。【方法】将引种于泰国、柬埔寨交趾黄檀10个种源的种子分别在海南乐东、广东广州和福建漳州进行多点育苗试验,并对1年生的苗木开展苗期生长性状(苗高和地径)测定与分析。用ASReml-R 3.0对种源与试验点进行方差分析,探讨种源间变异水平以及遗传稳定性;通过种源生长量均值与种子引种地的地理气候因子的简单相关分析揭示交趾黄檀苗期生长的地理变异模式;应用R语言程序(GGEBiplots)双标图进行各种源表现型及试验点的代表性分析,并采用类平均法进行基于表型的种源系统聚类分析。【结果】①不同种源交趾黄檀在3个试验点中表现一致,平均参试苗木高生长表现最好的是泰国北柳(T-CS)种源,平均地径生长表现最好的是泰国呵叻(T-NR)种源,来自柬埔寨磅湛(C-KC)种源的苗木生长表现最差。②交趾黄檀种源间苗期生长性状具有显著差异,各性状种源×地点具有极显著效应,表明种源、环境、种源×环境互作等效应对交趾黄檀苗木生长性状影响极其显著。③通过不同种源苗木多点生长表现与引种地地理气候因子的相关分析发现,10个种源交趾黄檀的生长性状在地理空间上存在一定程度的连续变异。生长性状的地理变异存在明显的气候生态学特征,主要受经度和年降雨量控制。④通过各种源在3个试验点的GGE双标图分析,泰国北柳(T-CS)种源和柬埔寨暹粒(C-SR)种源在3个试验点表现较优。柬埔寨暹粒(C-SR)种源在3个试验点的生长相对较稳定。⑤根据苗木生长表现、种源及试验点的遗传稳定性和聚类分析的结果,可以将10个种源大致划分为4个类群。生长表现最好的一类种源在苗高和地径上比最差的种源分别提高了147.23%和80.50%。【结论】通过多点多种源的联合分析可知,交趾黄檀在我国南方地区苗期生长良好,尤其适应我国海南热带地区。综合各种源苗木在各试验点的苗期生长表现,初步筛选出泰国北柳(T-CS)和柬埔寨暹粒(C-SR)2个生长表现较优且适应性较强的种源,可在我国南方热带和亚热带地区开展引种和遗传育种工作。
        【Objective】 Dalbergia cochinchinensis is a rosewood species in China, its wood and products are incredibly valuable, and it is also of important medicinal value. To evaluate the seedling growth of different D. cochinchinensis provenances, we studied the differences in the provenances, provenance-environment interactions, geographical variation patterns, and genetic stability of the seedling growth. We aimed to provide practical guidance and theoretical support for young period tests. Additionally, we wanted to create a good foundation for the future work on D. cochinchinensis provenance selection and cultivation.【Method】 We collected seeds and carried out container seedling tests with 10 provenances from Thailand and Cambodia in Ledong Hainan, Guangzhou, Guangdong and Zhangzhou Fujian. The seedling height and ground diameter were studied in one-year-old seedlings. The genetic variation and stability of different provenances were examined using a provenance and site ANONA model in the ASReml-R 3.0 software. The geographical variations in the seedling growth of D. cochinchinensis was revealed by the relationship between the growth of different provenances and local climatic factors. The growth performance of different provenances and the discrimitiveness and representativeness of the study sites were evaluated through GGE biplots in the R-language. The cluster analysis of different provenances of D. cochinchinensis was calculated using the average linkage method.【Result】 ① There were similar growth performances of the different provenances in the three testing sites. The 2 sites with the best growth performance in seedling height and ground diameter were the Chachoengsao and Nakhon Ratchasima Provinces from Thailand, whereas the seedling growing performance of Kampong Cham from Cambodia was the worst. ② There were highly significant differences in the growth traits among different provenances and provenance-environment interactions. The seedling growth of D. cochinchinensis was controlled by the provenance, environment and provenance-environment interaction effects. ③ There was a significant trend in the geographical variation of D. cochinchinensis at the seedling stage, controlled mainly by the latitude and annual rainfall, according to the correlation analysis between the multi-site growth and geographical factors of the origin regions. ④ We found that the Chachoengsao Province from Thailand and Siem Reap Province from Cambodia had good growth rates, and there was a relatively stable performance for the seedling growth of the Siem Reap Province, which was releveled by the additive main effects, plus a genotype-environment interaction model.⑤ The 10 provenances could be divided into four groups by the seedling's growth, genetic stability between the provinces, and environment and cluster analysis. The provenance group with the best performance was 147.23% and 80.50% higher than the worst group for seedling height and ground diameter, respectively. 【Conclusion】 There were good growth conditions for D. cochinchinensis at the seedling stage in southern China, especially in the tropical zone. Comprehensive analysis of the seedling growth of different provenances in 3 sites, revealed that the Chachoengsao Province from Thailand and Siem Reap Province from Cambodia, which have rapid growth rates and high adaptabilities, are the ideal origin provenances. The introduction and genetic breeding of D. cochinchinensis could be carried out in the tropical and subtropical areas of southern China.
引文
[1] J?KER D.Dalbergia cochinchinensis Pierre [R].Bangkok:Seed Leaflet-Danida Forest Seed Centre,2000.
    [2] MORITSUKA E,CHHANG P,TAGANE S,et al.Genetic variation and population structure of a threatened timber tree Dalbergia cochinchinensis in Cambodia[J].Tree Genetics & Genomes,2017,13(6):115.DOI:10.1007/s11295-017-1199-8.
    [3] 吴培衍,张荣标,张金文.红木树种新贵:交趾黄檀[J].福建热作科技,2016,41(4):51-54.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2327.2016.04.016.WU P Y,ZHANG R B,ZHANG J W.Rosewood:Dalbergia cochinchinensis[J].Fujian Science & Technology of Tropical Crops,2016,41(4):51-54.
    [4] 国家质量技术监督局.GB/T 18107—2017 红木 [S].北京:国家标准出版社,2017.State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision.GB/T 18107-2017 Rosewood [S].Beijing:National Standard Press,2017.
    [5] CITES Co P16 Prop 60.Consideration of proposals for amendment of appendices I and II [C]// Bangkok,Thailand:Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES),2013:1-16.
    [6] 孙书冬,周旭,罗炘,等.四种红酸枝木类树种的鉴别[J].林产工业,2012,39(3):50-53.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5299.2012.03.014.SUN S D,ZHOU X,LUO X,et al.Identification of four kinds of Dalbergia[J].China Forest Products Industry,2012,39(3):50-53.
    [7] 刘顺治,林金国,王晓娴,等.黄檀属和紫檀属6种红木化学组成及pH值的研究[J].西北林学院学报,2015,30(4):233-235.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.04.37.LIU S Z,LIN J G,WANG X X,et al.Contents of chemical components and metals in the wood in Dalbergia genus and Pterocarpus genus[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2015,30(4):233-235.
    [8] 魏鑫,秦志永,陈复明,等.4种东南亚黄檀属红木的表面润湿性能[J].西北林学院学报,2017,32(6):240-244.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2017.06.38.WEI X,QIN Z Y,CHEN F M,et al.Surface wettability of four finds of Dalbergia rosewoods in southeast Asia[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2017,32(6):240-244.
    [9] 曾秀珍.交趾黄檀实生苗培育技术[J].福建热作科技,2017,42(2):39-41.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2327.2017.02.010.ZENG X Z.Seedling nurture technology of Dalbergia cochinchinensis[J].Fujian Science & Technology of Tropical Crops,2017,42(2):39-41.
    [10] 李科,洪舟,杨曾奖,等.不同种源交趾黄檀种子形态及多点发芽率的差异[J].浙江农林大学学报,2018,35(1):121-127.DOI:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.01.016.LI K,HONG Z,YANG Z J,et al.Morphological variations in seeds from various provenances of Dalbergia cochinchinensis with a multi-site germination test[J].Journal of Zhejiang A&F University,2018,35(1):121-127.
    [11] 王豁然,江泽平,傅紫芰.林木引种驯化与森林可持续经营[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1998:165-171.WANG H R,JIANG Z P,FU Z Q.Sustainable management of exotic plantation forests[M].Beijing:China Environmental Science Press,1998:165-171.
    [12] 林元震,陈晓阳.R与ASReml-R统计分析教程[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2014:99-136.LIN Y Z,CHEN X Y.R & ASReml-R statistical analysis tutorial[M].Beijing:China Forestry Publishing,2014:99-136.
    [13] 张兰,张怡,段如雁,等.不同产地闽楠苗期性状变异及初步选择[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,40(6):33-40.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.06.006.ZHANG L,ZHANG Y,DUAN R Y,et al.Genetic variation among origin locations of Phoebe bournei (Hemsl.)Yang and a preliminary selection based on seedling growth and root traits[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition),2016,40(6):33-40.
    [14] 肖遥,楚秀丽,徐肇友,等.南方红豆杉2年生容器苗多点试验的生长节律家系变异[J].林业科学研究,2016,29(2):238-244.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1498.2016.02.014.XIAO Y,CHU X L,XU Z Y,et al.Family variation on growth rhythm of two-year-old container seedlings of Taxus wallichiana var.mairei in multi-location trials[J].Forest Research,2016,29(2):238-244.
    [15] 张双,谷俊涛,王进茂,等.刺槐群体引种试验及遗传多样性分析[J].园艺学报,2017,44(8):1609-1618.DOI:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2016-0964.ZHANG S,GU J T,WANG J M,et al.Analysis on introduction trial and genetic diversity of black locust populations[J].Acta Horticulturae Sinica,2017,44(8):1609-1618.
    [16] 王美婷,黄应锋,陈勇,等.强力班克木5个种源苗期生长研究[J].林业科学研究,2015,28(5):749-752.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1498.2015.05.023.WANG M T,HUANG Y F,CHEN Y,et al.Early growth analysis of 5 Banksia robur provenances[J].Forest Research,2015,28(5):749-752.
    [17] 黄国伟,彭婵,陈慧玲,等.不同种源红椿苗期生长及光合特性比较[J].西北林学院学报,2017,32(2):123-129.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2017.02.21.HUANG G W,PENG C,CHEN H L,et al.Comparison of the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Toona ciliata seedlings from different provenances[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2017,32(2):123-129.
    [18] 谢英赞,王朝英,马立辉,等.不同种源区桢楠种子形态、发芽特征及幼苗生长情况研究[J].西北林学院学报,2017,32(4):92-99.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2017.04.16.XIE Y Z,WANG C Y,MA L H,et al.Seed traits and seedling growth of Phoebe zhennan from different provenances[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2017,32(4):92-99.
    [19] 王国霞,关欣,刘震,等.不同泡桐品种(种源)埋根苗生长与光合特性分析[J].河南农业科学,2017,46(1):116-121.DOI:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2017.01.021.WANG G X,GUAN X,LIU Z,et al.Growth and photosynthetic characteristics of buried root seedlings of different Paulownia varieties[J].Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences,2017,46(1):116-121.
    [20] 王佩兰,康华荣,李柏海,等.乡土珍贵树种钩栗幼苗种源间光合生理特性研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2016,36(3):38-45.DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2016.03.008.WANG P L,KANG H R,LI B H,et al.Photosynthetic traits of the precious native species of Castanopsis tibetana seedlings among different provenances[J].Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology,2016,36(3):38-45.
    [21] 李金花,胡建军,卢孟柱,等.杨树良种‘欧美杨2012杨’[J].林业科学,2015,(3):175-175.DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150323.LI J H,HU J J,LU M Z,et al.An elite variety of Populus × euramericana cv.‘Por’[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2015,(3):175-175.
    [22] 王军辉,顾万春,张守攻.AMMI模型应用于桤木种源区域试验的分析研究[J].四川农业大学学报,2004,22(4):335-341.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2650.2004.04.011.WANG J H,GU W C,ZHANG S G.Analysis and research of AMMI model for Alder provenances regional trails[J].Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University,2004,22(4):335-341.
    [23] 刘志龙,方升佐,虞木奎,等.麻栎种源间苗期生长性状及遗传稳定性差异分析[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2012,36(5):26-30.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2012.05.004.LIU Z L,FANG S Z,YU M K,et al.Differences of seedling growth traits and genetic stability of Quercus acutissima from different provenances[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition),2012,36(5):26-30.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.