“共同决策模式”在ICU医患沟通中的应用价值
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Application Value of Shared Decision-making on Doctor-patient Communication in ICU
  • 作者:伍松柏 ; 吕爱莲
  • 英文作者:WU Song-bai;LV Ai-lian;Intensive Care Unit,The First Hospital of Changsha;
  • 关键词:医患共同决策 ; 重症监护室 ; 危重症 ; 医患沟通
  • 英文关键词:doctor-patient shared decision-making;;intensive care unit;;critical illness;;doctor-patient communication
  • 中文刊名:YXZX
  • 英文刊名:Medicine & Philosophy
  • 机构:长沙市第一医院重症医学科;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-20
  • 出版单位:医学与哲学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.40;No.617
  • 基金:2015年美国中华医学基金会公开竞争项目(CMB14-200)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:YXZX201906006
  • 页数:4
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:21-1093/R
  • 分类号:29-31+81
摘要
为了探讨"共同决策模式"在ICU医患沟通中的应用价值,分析178例ICU危重症患者医患沟通相关的临床调查数据,其中89例(对照组)采用常规医患沟通,另外89例(干预组)采用"医患共同决策"。结果显示,干预组患者家属沟通满意度良好,ICU住院时间及住院费用、患者家属焦虑抑郁评分、ICU内临终率均显著低于对照组(P<0.05);患者生活质量评分显著高于对照组(P<0.05);两组间90天死亡率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。因此,ICU危重症患者采用"共同决策"可以使患者、医院、社会获益,具有良好的应用价值。
        To explore the application value of shared decision-making(SDM)on doctor-patient communication in ICU.The clinical survey data related to doctor-patient communication of 178 patients with critical illness in ICU were analyzed,in which 89 patients(the control group)underwent the routine doctor-patient communication mode and 89 patients(the intervention group)underwent the SDM.The results showed that the family members of patients had good communication satisfaction in the intervention group with the length of ICU stay,the hospitalization medical care expenses,the anxiety and depression scale of family members of patients.The rate of death within the ICU in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).The quality of life scale of patients in the intervention group were significantly higher than those the control group(P<0.05).The difference of 90 dmortality was not statistically significant between the two groups(P>0.05).Therefore,the "SDM" applied in ICU patients was of benefit to patients,hospitals and society and had good application value.
引文
[1]王蔚,周愚,苏真娇,等.ICU面临的医患冲突原因和应对策略[J].中国医学伦理学,2014,27(4):534-536.
    [2]杜治政.共同决策:弥合分歧,营建医患同心的医疗[J].医学与哲学,2017,38(4A):1-6.
    [3]雷征霖.临床实践中如何实现医患共同决策[J].医学与哲学,2017,38(10A):5.
    [4]叶久红,李祖同,王霞,等.晚期癌症病人生活质量自评量表的编制及试测[J].护理研究,2009,23(16):1497-1499.
    [5]FUMIS R R,RANZANI O T,MARTINS P S,et al.Emotional disorders in pairs of patients and their family members during and after ICU stay[J].PLoS One,2015,10(1):e0115332.
    [6]徐小琳.患者对医疗决策参与的满意度量表的编制及信效度考评[D].长江:中南大学,2010.
    [7]沈群华,金晓琳.医患沟通在儿科工作中的重要性与建议[J].中医药管理杂志,2016,24(2):154-155.
    [8]洪霞.医患共同决策[J].协和医学杂志,2018,9(3):277-280.
    [9]侯胜田,王海星.我国公立医院医患沟通现状调查[J].医学与社会,2014,27(9):52-54.
    [10]STIGGELBOUT A M,PIETERSEA H,DE HAES J C.Shared decision making:Concepts,evidence,and practice[J].Patient Educ Couns,2015,98(10):1172-1179.
    [11]AUSTIN C A,MOHOTTIGE D,SUDORE R L,et al.Tools to promote shared decision making in serious illness:A systematic review[J].JAMA Intern Med,2015,175(7):1213-1221.
    [12]BAKITAS M,LYONS K D,HEGEL M T,et al.Oncologists'perspectives on concurrent palliative care in a national cancer institutedesignated comprehensive cancer center[J].Palliat Support Care,2013,11(5):415-423.
    [13]张鹏.中国的伦理文化与临终关怀[J].医学与哲学,2016,37(12A):27-31.
    [14]ASLAKSON R,CHENG J,VOLLENWEIDER D,et al.Evidencebased Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit:A Systematic Review of Interventions[J].J Palliat Med,2014,17(2):219-235.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.