食管癌术后单食管床引流管与胸腔、纵隔双管引流的应用效果比较
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Single esophageal bed drainage tube versus thoracic and mediastinal double-tube drainage after esophageal cancer operation
  • 作者:何静 ; 陈瑞 ; 何建明
  • 英文作者:HE Jing;CHEN Rui;HE Jianming;Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,Taixing People's Hospital in Jiangsu Province;
  • 关键词:食管床引流管 ; 食管癌 ; 胸腔、纵隔双管引流 ; 纵隔引流管 ; 胸腔引流管
  • 英文关键词:esophageal bed drainage tube;;esophageal cancer;;double thoracic and mediastinal drainage;;single mediastinal drainage tube;;drainage tube of pleural effusion
  • 中文刊名:XYZL
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
  • 机构:江苏省泰兴市人民医院胸心外科;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-08
  • 出版单位:实用临床医药杂志
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.23
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XYZL201911013
  • 页数:3
  • CN:11
  • ISSN:32-1697/R
  • 分类号:52-54
摘要
目的探讨食管癌术后在经食管床放置纵隔引流管基础上是否加用胸腔引流管对术后恢复的影响。方法选取100例经上腹右胸或者胸腔镜下食管癌切除患者,将单纵隔引流设为观察组,双管引流设为对照组,各50例。观察并比较2组术后疼痛评分及胸腔残余积液。结果 2组患者术后均顺利出院; 2组患者在术后4 d时疼痛评分及胸腔残余积液方面无显著差异(P> 0. 05),但观察组术后2、3 d的疼痛评分显著低于对照组(P <0. 05)。结论食管癌术后单纵隔管与双管相较在胸腔积液引流方面无显著差异。但单纵隔引流术后早期疼痛评分较低,有助于患者早期下床活动及有效咳嗽。
        Objective To study the effect of double thoracic and mediastinal drainage after esophagectomy based on single esophageal bed drainage tube on postoperative recovery of esophageal cancer patients. Methods A total of 100 cases with transabdominal right thoracic esophagectomy or video assisted thoracic esophagectomy in our department were selected. The patients with single mediastinal drainage was set as observation group,and those with double tube drainage was set as control group,with 50 cases in each group. Postoperative pain score and residual pleural effusion were observed. Results All cases were discharged successfully after operation. There was no significant difference between the two groups in postoperative residual pleural effusion,and the pain score at 4 d in the study group( P > 0. 05),but the pain score at 2,3 d was lower than the control group( P <0. 05). Conclusion There is no significant difference in the drainage of pleural effusion between two groups after esophagectomy. But the single mediastinal drainage has lower early postoperative pain score,and is helpful for patients to get out of bed and effectively cough in early stage.
引文
[1] Mongardon N,Tremey B,Marty J. Thoracentesis and chest tube management in critical care medicine:a multicenter survey of current practices[J]. Chest,2010,138(6):1524-1525.
    [2]李硕,王哲,张广健,等.罗哌卡因肋间神经阻滞在胸腔镜术后多模式镇痛作用[J].西北药学杂志,2018,33(3):385-388.
    [3]赵丽.胸腔积液的超声与X线诊断比较[J].中国医药指南,2014,12(3):45-46.
    [4]袁延亮,胡波,张成,等.食管癌根治术中留置食管床负压引流管的临床价值研究[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2018,6(13):77-78.
    [5]徐明明,朱俊,翁晓丹,等.自发性气胸术后不置胸腔引流管49例报告[J].实用临床医学,2017,18(10):26-27.
    [6]王志强,罗俊辉.胸腹腔镜食管癌手术后单根纵隔引流管的可行性临床研究[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2018,25(1):71-73.
    [7]黄可南,吴彬,齐晨,等.胸腔镜食管癌根治术后胸腔单一负压引流管与常规引流管临床效果比较[J].中华胸部外科电子杂志,2018,5(2):80-84.
    [8]宋晓阳,何爱萍,韩彬.不同麻醉和镇痛方法对食管癌患者围术期应激反应和细胞免疫功能的影响研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2018,47(5):619-622.
    [9]胡晓俭.纵隔、胸腔双引流在防治食管癌手术后并发症发生中的应用[J].当代临床医刊,2018,31(3):3890-3890,3877.
    [10] Li X,Lai F C,Qiu M L,et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the lateral-prone position[J]. Surgical Laparoscopy,Endoscopy&Percutaneous Techniques,2016,26(1):60-65.
    [11] Mu J W,Gao S G,Xue Q,et al. Updated experiences with minimally invasive Mc Keown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J]. World J Gastroenterol,2015,21(45):12873-12881.
    [12] Aarts M A,Okrainec A,Glicksman A,et al. Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay[J]. Surg Endosc,2012,26(2):442-450.
    [13] Linson J,Latzko M,Ahmed B,et al. Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with right aortic arch[J]. J Gastrointest Oncol,2017,8(1):E1-E2.
    [14] Takeuchi H,Miyata H,Ozawa S,et al. Comparison of shortterm outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer using a nationwide database in japan[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2017,24(7):1821-1827.
    [15] Straatman J,van der Wielen N,Cuesta M A,et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection:three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial:the TIME trial[J]. Ann Surg,2017,266(2):232-236.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.