肱骨近端锁定钢板与解剖钢板内固定治疗老年肱骨近端骨折对比研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparative Study of Locking Proximal Humerus Plate and Internal Plate Fixation on Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fra ctures in Elderly Patients
  • 作者:王刚
  • 英文作者:Gang Wang;Department of Orthopedics,Jinshui General Hospital;
  • 关键词:老年 ; 肱骨近端骨折 ; 肱骨近端锁定钢板内固定 ; 解剖钢板内固定 ; 肩关节功能
  • 英文关键词:Elderly Patients;;Proximal Humeral Fractures;;LPHP;;Internal Plate Fixation;;Shoulder Joint Function
  • 中文刊名:XZYY
  • 英文刊名:Tibetan Medicine
  • 机构:金水区总医院骨科;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-15
  • 出版单位:西藏医药
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.40;No.143
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XZYY201902004
  • 页数:3
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:54-1030/R
  • 分类号:14-16
摘要
目的对比研究肱骨近端锁定钢板与解剖钢板内固定治疗老年肱骨近端骨折应用效果。方法将我院2016年6月~2017年5月治疗的84例老年肱骨近端骨折作为研究对象,将其运用随机数表法分为两组,各42例。对照组实施解剖钢板内固定,观察组实施肱骨近端锁定钢板内固定。观察两组临床指标、肩关节功能、并发症发生率、炎症因子水平等。结果两组骨折愈合时间、VAS评分、并发症发生率:观察组优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);肩关节功能恢复优良率:对照组71.43%,观察组92.86%,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论老年肱骨近端骨折采用肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗,具有缩短骨折愈合时间、术后并发症少,利于肩关节功能的恢复。
        Objective: To compare the effects of locking proximal humerus plate(LPHP) and internal plate fixation on treatment of proxim al humeral fractures in elderly patients. Methods: Totally, 84 elderly patients undergoing proximal humeral fractures were admitted and treated in our hospital from June 2016 to May 2017. They were randomly divided into test group and control group with 42 patients in each group. Patients in control group were treated with internal plate fixation, while patients in test group were treated with LPHP. The clinical indexes, shoulder joint function, complications rate, and inflammation level were compared between the two groups. Results: The fracture concrescence time,VAS scores, complications rate in test group were significantly better than those in control group. The shoulder joint function in test group(92.86%) was significantly higher than that in control group(P < 0.05). Conclusions: Locking proximal humerus plate(LPHP) for treating pr oximal humeral fractures in elderly patients has advantages of shorter fracture concrescence time, less postoperative complication, benefiting for their recovery of shoulder joint function.
引文
[1]向成浩,王诗波,明玉祥.内侧柱支撑重建结合锁定钢板内固定治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2015,23(4):289-294.
    [2]彭林,王朝阳,孙军健,等.解剖锁定钢板内固定治疗Neer4部分肱骨近端骨折疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(5):555-556.
    [3]赵康全,杨惠林,王羿萌,等.解剖型锁定钢板内固定治疗老年性肱骨近端骨折疗效相关因素分析[J].重庆医学,2015,44(29):4148-4151.
    [4]黄纯聪,余学东,张华义,等.锁定钢板内固定系统治疗对肱骨近端骨折患者骨转换生化标志物、炎症因子含量的影响[J].海南医学院学报,2017,23(7):918-920.
    [5]于浩然,汤健,华兴一,等.锁定钢板内固定与半肩关节置换治疗老年人粉碎性肱骨近端骨折疗效的Meta分析[J].安徽医学,2016,37(12):1504-1508.
    [6]徐红革,王良恩,邱志杰,等.人工肱骨头置换术与肱骨近端锁定钢板内固定治疗老年肱骨近端骨折[J].西部医学,2015,27(8):1209-1211.
    [7]王铁钢,平少华.锁定钢板内固定联合抗骨质疏松治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的效果[J].中国医药导报,2015,12(8):91-93.
    [8]沈鹏程,徐能,蒋富贵,等.锁定钢板内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折术中内侧柱支撑的重要性[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2016,31(5):541-542.
    [9]白建忠,侯波,施慧峰,等.锁定钢板与普通钢板置入内固定修复肱骨近端骨折的预后对比[J].中国组织工程研究,2015,19(26):4213-4217.
    [10]赵训明,廖全明,王克军,等.人工肱骨头置换与肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗老年复杂肱骨近端骨折的近期临床疗效分析[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2015,12(5):20-23.
    [11]常宝生,冯阳阳,曹强,等.不同内固定方法对肱骨近端骨折的预后影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2017,17(15):2900-2902.
    [12]龚春柱,张卫红,张军波,等.锁定钢板内固定治疗高龄患者肱骨近端骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2016,19(6):701-701.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.