摘要
长期以来,古陶瓷学界坚持认为,中国早期瓷器主要分青瓷、白瓷两大体系,青瓷是一元配方,北方早期白瓷则是三元配方。本文基于磁州窑唐代青瓷、"青白瓷"、白瓷和宋代青瓷、白瓷五种样品成分对比分析,发现磁州窑的青瓷和白瓷在胎料组成和烧成温度上并无明显差别,主要是釉料不同,且出现了化妆土,这一结果从一个侧面证明,中国北方早期白瓷的瓷胎仍为一元配方,青瓷与白瓷之间有着密切的联系。而以"磁州窑"为代表的北方"青白瓷"明显不同于南方的"青白瓷",其游离于青瓷与白瓷之间,终未自成一体。
For a long time, the ancient ceramic circle has insisted that there are mainly two branches of China's early porcelain products, namely celadon and white porcelain. The formula for celadon is unitary and ternary for early white porcelain in the North. By comparing composition analyses of five samples from Cizhou Yao, i.e. celadon, Qingbai porcelain, white porcelain made in Tang Dynasty, and celadon, white porcelain made in Song Dynasty, this article presents its findings that there is no obvious difference between the pastes and baking temperature of celadon and white porcelain made in Cizhou Yao, the major difference lay in their glazes, and there was the existence of make-up clay. This finding proves that the formula for early white porcelain in North China was still unitary and there was a close connection between celadon and white porcelain. Qingbai Porcelain in the North, represented by those made in Cizhou Yao and obviously different from their counterparts made in the South, floated up and away from celadon and white porcelain and had never developed a style of its own.
引文
[1]陈万里.中国青瓷史略.上海:上海人民出版社,1956:33.
[2]冯先铭.略谈北方的青瓷.故宫博物院院刊,1958,(1):59~60.
[3]刘毅,袁胜文.北方早期青瓷初论.中原文物,1999,(2):86.
[4]同[2].
[5]赵宏.北朝、隋代白瓷考.陶瓷研究,1995,(2):109.
[6]杨爱玲.白瓷的起源和发展.中原文物,2004,(4):71~75.
[7]郭仁.关于青瓷和白瓷的起源.文物,1959,(6):14.
[8]同[3].
[9]李家治.中国科学技术史(陶瓷卷).北京:科学出版社,1998:5~10.
[10]周仁,李家治.中国历代名窑陶瓷工艺的初步科学总结.考古学报,1960,(1):96,97.
[11]李家治.简论中国古代陶瓷科技发展史.建筑材料学报,2000,(1):9~13.
[12]李国桢,郭演仪.中国名瓷工艺基础.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1988:85.
[13]朱铁权,等.隋代邢窑粗白瓷胎料配方研究.岩石矿物学杂志,2010,(3):314~318.
[14]同[9].
[15]秦大树.磁州窑的研究史.文物春秋,1990,(4):26~30.
[16]邯郸市文物保护研究所,等.河北邯郸临水北朝至元代瓷窑遗址发掘简报.文物,2015,(8):30~55.
[17]明朝方,等.景德镇早期青白瓷的器型与色度.文物保护与考古科学,2016,(4)∶83~88.
[18]李立新.湖田窑青白瓷的综合研究.中国科学院研究生院硕士学位论文,2010.
[19]崔剑锋,吴小红,等.台湾出土部分古代玻璃珠的科学分析.南方文物,2008,(4):110~111.
[20]崔剑锋,吴小红,等.杭州老虎洞窑址出土“修内司窑”铭款荡箍的化学成分分析.文物,2009,(12):87~88.
