摘要
经尿道前列腺电切术是治疗良性前列腺增生的"金标准"。对于大体积良性前列腺增生,传统电切术存在手术时间长、残留腺体多、术中出血多、腺体切除率低和住院时间长等弊端,从而增加围术期手术风险和术后复发率。因此,大体积良性前列腺增生微创治疗仍然是一临床难题,本文就临床治疗大体积前列腺现状和趋势作一述评供临床指导参考。
Transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP) is a gold standard for the treatment of BPH. However, for large-volume BPH, TURP has its disadvantages of longer operation time, more residual glands, more intraoperative bleeding, lower efficiency, and longer hospital stay, which increase the risks of surgery and postoperative symptomatic recurrence. Therefore, minimally invasive treatment of large-volume BPH remains a clinical challenge. This paper focuses on the status quo and prospects of minimally invasive treatment of large-volume BPH, hoping to give some help with clinical practice.Natl J Androl,2019,25(5):387-391
引文
[1] 那彦群.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南手册.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014.
[2] Wang L,Yu QY,Liu Y,et al.Efficacy and safety of laser surgery and transurethral resection of the prostate for treating benign prostate hyperplasia:A network meta-analysis.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2016,17(9):4281-4288.
[3] Protogerou V,Argyropoulos V,Patrozos K.An alternative minimally invasive technique for large prostates (>80 mL):Transvesical prostatectomy through a 3 cm incision.Urology,2010,75(1):184-186.
[4] Nuhoglu B,Ayyildiz A,Karagüzel E,et al.Plasmakinetic prostate resection in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia:Results of 1-year follow-up.Int J Urol,2006,13(1):21-24.
[5] Liu Z,Li YW,Wu WR,et al.Long-term clinical efficacy and safety profile of transurethral resection of the prostate versus plasmakinetic resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia.Urology,2017,103:198-203.
[6] 罗刚,汪良,曾甫清,等.经尿道等离子双极电切术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生诊疗体会.临床泌尿外科杂志,2014,29(4):293-295.
[7] 曾宪涛,翁鸿.中国良性前列腺增生症经尿道等离子双极电切术治疗指南(2018简化版).中国循证医观察,临床外科杂志,2015,23(10):789-791.
[8] 刘春晓.经尿道前列腺腔内剜除术.中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2009,3(1):25.
[9] Lin Y,Wu X,Xu A,et al.Transurethral enucleation of the prostate versus transvesical open prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia:A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.World J Urol,2015,34(9):1207-1219.
[10] 魏乔红,李涛,陈广瑜,等.经尿道前列腺分叶剜除术与电切术治疗大体积前列腺增生症的比较研究.微创泌尿外科杂志,2016,5(5):271-274.
[11] 徐啊白,罗福,邹志辉,等.刨削器在经尿道双极等离子体前列腺解剖性剜除术中的临床应用.南方医科大学学报,2016,36(8):1100-1104.
[12] Vincent MW,Gilling PJ.HoLEP has come of age.World J Urol,2015,33(4):487-493.
[13] Jones P,Alzweri L,Rai BP,et al.Holmium laser enucleation versus simple prostatectomy for treating large prostates:Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arab J Urol,2016,14(1):50-58.
[14] Glybochko PV,Rapoport LM,Enikeev ME,et al.Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for small,large and giant prostatic hyperplasia:Tips and tricks.Urologia,2017,84(3):169-173.
[15] Orlov IN,Popov SV,Martov AG,et al.Comparative assessment of treatments for prostate adenoma greater than 100 cm3.Urologiia,2017,12(6):82-86.
[16] Sun F,Han B,Cui D,et al.Long-term results of thulium laser resection of the prostate:A prospective study at multiple centers.World J Urol,2015,33(4):503-508.
[17] Pearce SM,Pariser JJ,Malik RD,et al.Outcomes following Thulium vapoenucleation of large prostates.Int Braz J Urol,2016,42(4):757-765.
[18] Pfitzenmaier J,Gilfrich C,Pritsch M,et al.Vaporization of prostates of ≥80 m using a potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser:Midterm-results and comparison with prostates of <80mL.BJU Int,2008,102(3):322-327.
[19] Elmansy H,Baazeem A,Kotb A,et al.Holmium laser enucleation versus photoselective vaporization for prostatic adenoma greater than 60 ml:Preliminary results of a prospective,randomized clinical trial.J Urol,2012,188(1):216-221.
[20] Meskawi M,Hueber PA,Valdivieso R,et al.Multicenter international experience of 532 nm-laser photovaporization with greenlight XPS in men with large prostates (prostate volume > 100 cc).World J Urol,2017,35(10):1603-1609.
[21] Sancha FG,Rivera VC,Georgiev G,et al.Common trend:Move to enucleation — Is there a case for GreenLight enucleation?Development and description of the technique.World J Urol,2015,33(4):539-547.
[22] Misrai V,Kerever S,Phe V,et al.Direct comparison of greenLight laser XPS photoselective prostate vaporization and GreenLight laser En Bloc enucleation of the prostate in enlarged glands greater than 80 ml:A study of 120 patients.J Urol,2016,195(4):1027-1032.
[23] Oelke M,Bachmann A,Descazeaud A,et al.EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction.Eur Urol,2013,64(1):118-140.
[24] Umari P,Fossati N,Gandaglia G,et al.Robotic assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with large volume prostates (>100 ml):A comparative analysis from a high-volume center.J Urol,2017,197(4):1108-1114.
[25] 刘春晓.传统经尿道前列腺电切术不应再是前列腺增生腔内治疗的金标准.现代泌外科杂志,2012,17(3):298-299.
[26] 蔡芳震,陈朝虹,张建育.三种腔镜前列腺切除手术并发症比较及Clavien-Dindo分级应用.南方医科大学学报,2015,35(9):1344-1348.
[27] Qian X,Liu H,Xu D,et al.Functional outcomes and complications following B-TURP versus HoLEP for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia:A review of the literature and Meta-analysis.Aging Male,2017,20(3):184-191.
[28] Zhou Y,Xue B,Mohammad NA,et al.Greenlight high-performance system (HPS) 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia:A meta-analysis of the published results of randomized controlled trials.Lasers Med Sci,2016,31(3):485-495.
[29] 丁茂,粘烨琦,胡善彪,等.经尿道选择性120W绿激光前列腺汽化术治疗良性前列腺增疗效和安全性的Meta分析.中华男科学杂志,2015,21(7):646-654.
