老年胆囊结石伴胆囊炎两种术式的对比观察
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparative Observation on Two Surgical Procedures for Cholecystolithiasis and Cholecystitis in the Elderly
  • 作者:严奇峰
  • 英文作者:YAN Qifeng;Department of General Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Zhangjiagang;
  • 关键词:老年患者 ; 胆囊结石 ; 胆囊 ; 开腹胆囊切除 ; 腹腔镜胆囊切除 ; 出血量
  • 英文关键词:elderly patients;;cholecystolithiasis;;cholecystitis;;open cholecystectomy;;laparoscopic cholecystectomy;;bleeding amount
  • 中文刊名:WSBZ
  • 英文刊名:China Health Standard Management
  • 机构:张家港市第二人民医院普外科;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:中国卫生标准管理
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.10
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:WSBZ201903016
  • 页数:3
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:11-5908/R
  • 分类号:45-47
摘要
目的探讨分析老年胆囊结石伴胆囊炎开腹胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床疗效。方法选取2014年2月—2017年2月在我院接受治疗的老年胆囊结石伴胆囊炎患者60例分为观察组(腹腔镜胆囊切除术)和对照组(开腹胆囊切除术)各30例。对比两组患者手术效果、手术相关指标以及相关并发症的发生情况。结果观察组临床总有效率达到96.67%,对照组患者临床总有效率为70.00%,观察组临床总有效率高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05);观察组患者手术切口长度短于对照组,手术时间和术中出血量以少于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05);观察组患者术后排气时间、下床活动时间、住院时间均少于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05);观察组患者并发症发生率为13.33%,对照组患者并发症发生率为36.67%,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论老年胆囊结石伴胆囊炎患者实施腹腔镜胆囊切除术,可取得良好临床效果。
        Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis and cholecystitis. Methods 60 patients with cholecystolithiasis and cholecystitis who were treated in our hospital from February 2014 to February 2017 were enrolled in the observation group(laparoscopic cholecystectomy) and the control group(open cholecystectomy). The surgical outcomes, surgical related indicators, and related complications were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of the observation group(96.67%) was significantly higher than that of the control group(70.00%), the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). The incision length of the observational group was shorter than that of the control group, the operation time and bleeding amount during operation in the observation group was fewer than those in the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P <0.05). The time of exhaust after operation, out of bed and hospitalization of the patients in the group was shorter than those in the control group(P< 0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group(13.33%)was significantly lower than that in the control group(36.67%)(P <0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients with cholecystolithiasis and cholecystitis can achieve good clinical results.
引文
[1]李金.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术治疗老年急性胆囊炎的疗效对比[J].基层医学论坛,2018,22(16):2176-2178.
    [2]许良,许明友,杨先芬.老年急性胆囊炎开腹胆囊切除与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的治疗效果对比及对患者肠道功能影响分析[J].安徽医药,2018,22(4):721-724.
    [3]张飞.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术治疗老年急性胆囊炎的疗效分析[J].基层医学论坛,2018,22(8):1070-1071.
    [4]徐洪全,王贻东,李文博,等.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗老年急性胆囊炎的疗效比较[J].中国继续医学教育,2017,9(33):65-66.
    [5]吴二军,史继红,郭云虎.用腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术对老年急性胆囊炎患者进行治疗的效果比较[J].当代医药论丛,2017,15(19):100-102.
    [6]黄利勇,郑志刚,程华勇.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术治疗老年急性胆囊炎的疗效分析[J].中外医疗,2017,36(25):11-13.
    [7]高长春.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术治疗老年胆囊炎临床比较[J].中外医疗,2017,36(17):93-94,97.
    [8]陈诚.用腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术对老年急性胆囊炎患者进行治疗的效果对比[J].当代医药论丛,2016,14(24):31-32.
    [9]王耀东,侯森,时永,等.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术治疗老年急性胆囊炎的疗效对比研究[J].中国继续医学教育,2015,7(32):108-109.
    [10]皮园园.腹腔镜及开腹胆囊切除术治疗老年急性胆囊炎的临床疗效及安全性比较[J].中国实用医药,2015,10(25):102-103.
    [11]马雪,胡占升.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术治疗老年急性胆囊炎的疗效比较[J].实用医学杂志,2015,31(6):931-933.
    [12]唐海生.腹腔镜胆囊切除术在老年急性化脓性胆囊炎中的应用及效果分析[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2015,25(4):105-107.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.